BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1540709)

  • 1. Thrombus-trapping efficiency of the LGM (Vena Tech) and titanium Greenfield filters in vivo.
    Millward SF; Marsh JI; Pon C; Moher D
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1992 Feb; 3(1):103-6. PubMed ID: 1540709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. In vitro and in vivo experimental evaluation of a new vena caval filter.
    Qian Z; Yasui K; Nazarian GK; Vlodaver Z; Hunter DW; Castaneda-Zuniga WR; Amplatz K
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1994; 5(3):513-8. PubMed ID: 8054757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term results of vena cava filters: experiences with the LGM and the Titanium Greenfield devices.
    Wittenberg G; Kueppers V; Tschammler A; Scheppach W; Kenn W; Hahn D
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1998; 21(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 9626439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Incomplete caval protection following suprarenal caval filter placement--a case report.
    Lemmon GW; Litscher LJ
    Angiology; 2000 Feb; 51(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 10701724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimal central trapping (OPCETRA) vena caval filter: results of experimental studies.
    Kraimps JL; De La Faye D; Drouineau J; Bensignor E; Barbier J
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1992 Nov; 3(4):697-701. PubMed ID: 1446131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro flow phantom analysis and clot-capturing ability of incompletely opened Vena Tech-LGM vena caval filters.
    Korbin CD; Reed RA; Taylor FC; Kokoris SP; Teitelbaum GP
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1993; 16(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 8435832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. LGM vena cava filter: objective evaluation of early results.
    Murphy TP; Dorfman GS; Yedlicka JW; McCowan TC; Vogelzang RL; Hunter DW; Carver DK; Pinsk R; Castaneda-Zuniga W; Ferris EJ
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1991 Feb; 2(1):107-15. PubMed ID: 1799739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of titanium and stainless steel, Greenfield vena caval filters.
    Greenfield LJ; Savin MA
    Surgery; 1989 Nov; 106(5):820-8. PubMed ID: 2683171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vivo evaluation of vena caval filters: can function be linked to design characteristics?
    Proctor MC; Cho KJ; Greenfield LJ
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2000; 23(6):460-5. PubMed ID: 11232895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extended evaluation of the titanium Greenfield vena caval filter.
    Greenfield LJ; Proctor MC; Cho KJ; Cutler BS; Ferris EJ; McFarland D; Sobel M; Tisnado J
    J Vasc Surg; 1994 Sep; 20(3):458-64; discussion 464-5. PubMed ID: 8084040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of a new percutaneous stainless steel Greenfield filter by intravascular ultrasonography.
    Greenfield LJ; Tauscher JR; Marx MV
    Surgery; 1991 Jun; 109(6):722-9. PubMed ID: 2042090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Oversized inferior vena cava: use of a single Vena Tech--LGM filter.
    Millward SF; Aquino J; Peterson RA
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 1996 Aug; 47(4):272-4. PubMed ID: 8696995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the LGM Vena-Tech infrarenal vena cava filter in an ovine venous thromboembolism model.
    Crochet D; GrossetĂȘte R; Bach-Lijour B; Larguier L; Le Nihouannen JC
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2001 Jun; 12(6):739-45. PubMed ID: 11389226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Experimental comparison of percutaneous vena caval devices: titanium Greenfield filter versus bird's nest filter.
    Burke PE; Michna BA; Harvey CF; Crute SL; Sobel M; Greenfield LJ
    J Vasc Surg; 1987 Jul; 6(1):66-70. PubMed ID: 3599283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro evaluation of clot capture efficiency of an absorbable vena cava filter.
    Dria SJ; Eggers MD
    J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2016 Oct; 4(4):472-8. PubMed ID: 27639002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inferior vena cava filters. Indications, safety, effectiveness.
    Becker DM; Philbrick JT; Selby JB
    Arch Intern Med; 1992 Oct; 152(10):1985-94. PubMed ID: 1417371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evolution of hook design for fixation of the titanium Greenfield filter.
    Greenfield LJ; Cho KJ; Tauscher JR
    J Vasc Surg; 1990 Sep; 12(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 2398592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. In vitro study of guide wire entrapment in currently available inferior vena cava filters.
    Stavropoulos SW; Itkin M; Trerotola SO
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2003 Jul; 14(7):905-10. PubMed ID: 12847198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Vena cava filter for prevention of pulmonary embolism].
    Winkler WB; Slany J
    Vasa; 1999 Nov; 28(4):250-8. PubMed ID: 10611842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experimental embolic capture by asymmetric Greenfield filters.
    Greenfield LJ; Proctor MC
    J Vasc Surg; 1992 Sep; 16(3):436-43; discussion 443-4. PubMed ID: 1341883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.