101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1541462)
1. Graphic interfaces may create faster links to patient data.
Hard R
Hospitals; 1992 Mar; 66(6):86, 88. PubMed ID: 1541462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The future of healthcare information systems. Interview by Barry S. Bader.
Ruffin M
Health Syst Lead; 1994 Oct; 1(8):19-24. PubMed ID: 10140122
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Technical innovation in a nursing unit].
Ste-Marie F
Infirm Que; 1998; 5(3):52-3. PubMed ID: 9496072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Reducing barriers to physician data entry for computer-based patient records.
Kaplan B
Top Health Inf Manage; 1994 Aug; 15(1):24-34. PubMed ID: 10135720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is your healthcare information system physician friendly?
Quinn MM; Weber B; Ciotti VG
Healthc Financ Manage; 1997 Jun; 51(6):62-8. PubMed ID: 10167844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The clinical connection. Hospitals work to design information systems that physicians will use.
Lumsdon K
Hospitals; 1993 May; 67(9):16. PubMed ID: 8477983
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Electronic documentation on a psychiatric unit.
Tiessen B; Doan K; Benoit L
Can Nurse; 2001 Nov; 97(10):27-9. PubMed ID: 11765435
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Nursing personnel attitudes prior to the introduction of informatic tools and contemporary vision of a hospital information system].
Vereecke PJ
Rech Soins Infirm; 1996 Sep; (46):83-93. PubMed ID: 16737037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Workstations that work.
Morrissey J
Mod Healthc; 1994 Oct; 24(41):40-2, 44. PubMed ID: 10138633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. User needs and demands of a computer-based patient record.
Dumont R; van der Loo R; van Merode F; Tange H
Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 52 Pt 1():64-9. PubMed ID: 10384421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors influencing nurses' attitudes towards the use of computerized health information systems in Kuwaiti hospitals.
Alquraini H; Alhashem AM; Shah MA; Chowdhury RI
J Adv Nurs; 2007 Feb; 57(4):375-81. PubMed ID: 17291201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. From documents on paper to electronic medical records.
Carrajo L; Penas A; Melcón R; González FJ; Couto E
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 136():395-400. PubMed ID: 18487763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The irrepressible computer. The brave new world of healthcare information technology.
Heimoff S
Healthc Forum J; 1998; 41(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 10175819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Nurses and clinical technology: sources of resistance and strategies for acceptance.
Kirkley D; Stein M
Nurs Econ; 2004; 22(4):216-22, 195. PubMed ID: 15382401
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The effectiveness of a hospital bedside computer system.
Elliott RL; Finley M; Ramus J
Medsurg Nurs; 1995 Feb; 4(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 7874219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Time for an interface-lift?
Essex D
Healthc Inform; 2000 Apr; 17(4):145-6, 148-56. PubMed ID: 11066560
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Healthcare's new tools of the trade: how to gain physician buy-in.
Wolf EJ
Healthc Exec; 2001; 16(5):14-8. PubMed ID: 11544856
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A large, high resolution tiled display for medical use: experiences from prototyping of a radiology scenario.
Olsen BI; Dhakal SB; Eldevik OP; Hasvold P; Hartvigsen G
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 136():535-40. PubMed ID: 18487786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Survey says: care, communication enhanced by IT. Nurses report ups and downs of current systems.
Sensmeier J
Nurs Manage; 2006 Oct; Suppl():2, 4, 6 passim. PubMed ID: 17016162
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Use of information systems for direct surgical patient management].
Krieglstein CF; Schall R; Runkel M; Herfarth C
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd; 1997; 114():656-9. PubMed ID: 9574233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
