These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15415481)

  • 1. Comment on Estes' study Generalization of secondary reinforcement from the primary drive.
    MOWRER OH
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1950 Apr; 43(2):148-51. PubMed ID: 15415481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. PERCEPTION, DRIVE, AND BEHAVIOR THEORY.
    ZAJONC RB; DORFMAN DD
    Psychol Rev; 1964 Jul; 71():273-90. PubMed ID: 14183612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ON THE COMBINATION OF DRIVE AND INCENTIVE MOTIVATION.
    BLACK RW
    Psychol Rev; 1965 Jul; 72():310-7. PubMed ID: 14348426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of the secondary reinforcing agents on the primary thirst drive.
    SIMON CW; WICKENS DD; BROWN U; PENNOCK L
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1951 Feb; 44(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 14814242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Generalization of secondary reinforcement from the primary drive.
    ESTES WK
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1949 Aug; 42(4):286-95. PubMed ID: 18147978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CONDITIONING AND GENERALIZATION OF INFLUENCE BEHAVIOR.
    AIKEN EG
    Percept Mot Skills; 1965 Feb; 20():159-65. PubMed ID: 14286507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SOME NOTES ON CONDITIONED SUPPRESSION AND REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULES.
    LYON DO
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1964 Jul; 7(4):289-91. PubMed ID: 14176272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Force-contingent reinforcement in instrumental conditioning and extinction in children: a test of the frustration-drive hypothesis.
    Blixt S; Ley R
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1969 Oct; 69(2):267-72. PubMed ID: 5404457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CONDITIONED SUPPRESSION IN GOLDFISH AS A FUNCTION OF SHOCK-REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE.
    GELLER I
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1964 Sep; 7(5):345-9. PubMed ID: 14218288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conditioning and generalization of positive self-evaluations in a partially structured diagnostic interview.
    Aiken EG; Parker WH
    Psychol Rep; 1965 Oct; 17(2):459-64. PubMed ID: 5833268
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. EFFECT OF STRENGTH OF DRIVE DETERMINED BY A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR APPETITIVE CLASSICAL CONDITIONING OF RATS.
    DEBOLD RC; MILLER NE; JENSEN DD
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1965 Feb; 59():102-8. PubMed ID: 14282384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. EFFECTS OF AVERAGING DATA DURING STIMULUS GENERALIZATION.
    MIGLER B
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1964 Jul; 7(4):303-7. PubMed ID: 14176276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of stimulus change and drive level on extinction of the conditioned eyelid response.
    Cobb NJ; Price LE; Abbott DW
    Psychol Rep; 1967 Jun; 20(3):775-8. PubMed ID: 6042482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. APPETITIVELY CONDITIONED AND DRIVE-RELATED BIOELECTRIC BASELINE SHIFT IN CAT CORTEX.
    ROWLAND V; GOLDSTONE M
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1963 Jun; 15():474-85. PubMed ID: 14143769
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reinforcement and drive level determinants of expectancy generalization.
    HEATH D
    J Gen Psychol; 1962 Jul; 67():69-82. PubMed ID: 13905781
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Studies in secondary reinforcement. II. Secondary reinforcement as a function of the strength of drive during primary reinforcement.
    HALL JF
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1951 Oct; 44(5):462-6. PubMed ID: 14888740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. THE CONTEXT OF REINFORCEMENT IN VERBAL CONDITIONING.
    WEISS RL; EKMAN P; ULLMANN LP; KRASNER L
    J Clin Psychol; 1965 Jan; 21():99-100. PubMed ID: 14283665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stimulus generalization of a positive conditioned reinforcer.
    THOMAS DR; WILLIAMS JL
    Science; 1963 Jul; 141(3576):172-3. PubMed ID: 13981055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Invariance of operant topography throughout changes in motivational conditions.
    Corman CD; Miles RC
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1966 Aug; 62(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 5968279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of different measures of response strength in the study of stimulus generalization.
    Thomas DR; Konick DS
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1966 May; 9(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 5948922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.