These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1541577)
1. Hypnotic inductions with deaf and hearing subjects--an initial comparison: a brief communication. Matthews WJ; Isenberg GL Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1992 Jan; 40(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 1541577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of the hypnotic experience between signing deaf and hearing participants. Matthews WJ; Isenberg GL Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1995 Oct; 43(4):375-85. PubMed ID: 7591339 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hypnotic responsivity of the deaf: the development of the University of Tennessee Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale for the Deaf. Repka RJ; Nash MR Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1995 Jul; 43(3):316-31. PubMed ID: 7635582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hypnosis with signing deaf and hearing subjects. Isenberg GL; Matthews WJ Am J Clin Hypn; 1995 Jul; 38(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 8533737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Working hypnotically with deaf people. Isenberg GL; Matthews WJ Am J Clin Hypn; 1991 Oct; 34(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 1957813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effectiveness of standardized versus individualized hypnotic suggestions: a brief communication. Van Der Does AJ; Van Dyck R; Spinhoven P; Kloosman A Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1989 Jan; 37(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 2784423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hypnotic deafness: a psychophysical study of responses to tone intensity as modified by hypnosis. Crawford HJ; Macdonald H; Hilgard ER Am J Psychol; 1979 Jun; 92(2):193-214. PubMed ID: 474833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The phenomenology of the experiences and the depth of hypnosis: comparison of direct and indirect induction techniques. Szabó C Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1993 Jul; 41(3):225-33. PubMed ID: 8335421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Direct and indirect scales of hypnotic susceptibility: resistance to therapy and psychometric comparability. Robin BR; Kumar VK; Pekala RJ Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2005 Apr; 53(2):135-47. PubMed ID: 16025732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 40-Hz EEG activity during hypnotic induction and hypnotic testing. DePascalis V; Penna PM Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1990 Apr; 38(2):125-38. PubMed ID: 2347669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Replication of trance logic using a modified experimental design: highly hypnotizable subjects in both real and simulator groups. Marks DF; Baird JM; McKellar P Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1989 Jul; 37(3):232-48. PubMed ID: 2753574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Not all group hypnotic suggestibility scales are created equal: individual differences in behavioral and subjective responses. Barnes SM; Lynn SJ; Pekala RJ Conscious Cogn; 2009 Mar; 18(1):255-65. PubMed ID: 18778955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hypnotic and posthypnotic suggestion: finding meaning in the message of the hypnotist. Barnier AJ; McConkey KM Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1999 Jul; 47(3):192-208. PubMed ID: 10616254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Durability of "posthypnotic suggestions" as a function of type of suggestion and trance depth. Berrigan LP; Kurtz RM; Stabile JP; Strube MJ Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1991 Jan; 39(1):24-38. PubMed ID: 2001895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of hypnosis in a deaf patient with multiple personality disorder: a case report. Bowman ES; Coons PM Am J Clin Hypn; 1990 Oct; 33(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 2270843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hypnosis and transference: a measure of archaic involvement. Nash MR; Spinler D Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1989 Apr; 37(2):129-44. PubMed ID: 2722302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Hearing impairment and psychopathological disorders in children and adolescents. Review of the recent literature]. Bailly D; Dechoulydelenclave MB; Lauwerier L Encephale; 2003; 29(4 Pt 1):329-37. PubMed ID: 14615703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Measuring hypnotizability: the case for self-report depth scales and normative data for the long Stanford scale. Wagstaff GF; Cole JC; Brunas-Wagstaff J Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2008 Apr; 56(2):119-42. PubMed ID: 18307124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Direct versus indirect suggestions: a conceptual and methodological review. Lynn SJ; Neufeld V; Maré C Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1993 Apr; 41(2):124-52. PubMed ID: 8468104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]