These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1541577)
21. A note of caution on the Waterloo-Stanford Group Scale of hypnotic susceptibility: a brief communication. Cardeña E; Terhune DB Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2009 Apr; 57(2):222-6. PubMed ID: 19234968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Phonological awareness and short-term memory in hearing and deaf individuals of different communication backgrounds. Koo D; Crain K; LaSasso C; Eden GF Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Dec; 1145():83-99. PubMed ID: 19076391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Acoustic image in visual detection for deaf and hearing college students. Chen K J Gen Psychol; 1976 Apr; 94(2d Half):243-6. PubMed ID: 956789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Responsiveness to direct versus indirect hypnotic procedures: the role of resistance as a predictor variable. Groth-Marnat G; Mitchell K Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1998 Oct; 46(4):324-33. PubMed ID: 9780524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of the prevalence of mental health problems in deaf and hearing children and adolescents in Australia. Remine MD; Brown PM Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2010 Apr; 44(4):351-7. PubMed ID: 20307167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prospective time estimation and hypnotizability in a simulator design. Mozenter RH; Kurtz RM Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1992 Jul; 40(3):169-79. PubMed ID: 1399154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The use of a multimodal image, the apple technique, to facilitate clinical hypnosis: a brief communication. Strauss BS Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1991 Jan; 39(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 2001894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A comparison of the effects of standardized Chiasson and eye-closure inductions on susceptibility scores. Page RA; Handley GW Am J Clin Hypn; 1991 Jul; 34(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 1951143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Measuring change in the subjective experience of hypnosis. McConkey KM; Wende V; Barnier AJ Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1999 Jan; 47(1):23-39. PubMed ID: 9889485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The effects of direct versus indirect hypnotic suggestion on pain in a cold pressor task. Maurer C; Santangelo M; Claiborn CD Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1993 Oct; 41(4):305-16. PubMed ID: 8407019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Hypnotic emotions and physical sensations: a real-simulating analysis. Bryant RA; McConkey KM Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1989 Oct; 37(4):305-19. PubMed ID: 2793271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The role of expectancy in hypnotic hypermnesia: a brief communication. Grabowski KL; Roese NJ; Thomas MR Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1991 Oct; 39(4):193-7. PubMed ID: 1937989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Speech perception in congenitally, pre-lingually and post-lingually deaf children expressed in an equivalent hearing loss value. Rotteveel LJ; Snik AF; Vermeulen AM; Cremers CW; Mylanus EA Clin Otolaryngol; 2008 Dec; 33(6):560-9. PubMed ID: 19126130 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Brief hypnosis substitutes for alprazolam use in college students: transient experiences and quantitative EEG responses. Nishith P; Barabasz A; Barabasz M; Warner D Am J Clin Hypn; 1999 Jan; 41(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 10554387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A concurrent validity study between the Hypnotic Induction Profile (HIP) and the Stanford Hypnotic Clinical Scale for Adults (SHCS:A) in an inpatient sample: a brief report. Gritzalis N; Oster M; Frischholz EJ Am J Clin Hypn; 2009 Oct; 52(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 19862895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The hypnotist in the hypnosis interaction: the impact of first impressions on perceptions of hypnotizability. Whitehead S; Noller P; Sheehan PW Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2008 Oct; 56(4):394-424. PubMed ID: 18726805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Defining hypnosis as a trance vs. cooperation: hypnotic inductions, suggestibility, and performance standards. Lynn SJ; Vanderhoff H; Shindler K; Stafford J Am J Clin Hypn; 2002; 44(3-4):231-40. PubMed ID: 11799537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The impact of visual communication on the intersubjective development of early parent-child interaction with 18- to 24-month-old deaf toddlers. Loots G; Devisé I; Jacquet W J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2005; 10(4):357-75. PubMed ID: 16000693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Visual attention in deaf and hearing infants: the role of auditory cues. Harris M; Chasin J J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2005 Oct; 46(10):1116-23. PubMed ID: 16178936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Changes in body attitude as a function of posthypnotic suggestions. Van Denburg EJ; Kurtz RM Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1989 Jan; 37(1):15-30. PubMed ID: 2925291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]