46 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1541628)
1. Long-term (twelve to eighteen-year) follow-up of cemented total hip replacements in patients who were less than fifty years old. A follow-up note.
Maar DC; Mont MA; Krackow KA; Hungerford DS
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1992 Feb; 74(2):307-8. PubMed ID: 1541628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term (twelve to eighteen-year) follow-up of cemented total hip replacements in patients who were less than fifty years old. A follow-up note.
Collis DK
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1991 Apr; 73(4):593-7. PubMed ID: 2013599
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in patients fifty-five years of age or older. An analysis of the Finnish arthroplasty registry.
Mäkelä KT; Eskelinen A; Pulkkinen P; Paavolainen P; Remes V
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Oct; 90(10):2160-70. PubMed ID: 18829914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cemented versus cementless total hip replacements in patients fifty-five years of age or older with rheumatoid arthritis.
Mäkelä KT; Eskelinen A; Pulkkinen P; Virolainen P; Paavolainen P; Remes V
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Jan; 93(2):178-86. PubMed ID: 21248215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cementless total hip arthroplasty with large diameter metal-on-metal heads: short-term survivorship of 8059 hips from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
Mokka J; Mäkelä KT; Virolainen P; Remes V; Pulkkinen P; Eskelinen A
Scand J Surg; 2013; 102(2):117-23. PubMed ID: 23820688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Furlong hydroxyapatite-coated hip prosthesis vs the Charnley cemented hip prosthesis.
Chandran P; Azzabi M; Miles J; Andrews M; Bradley J
J Arthroplasty; 2010 Jan; 25(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 19056219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Long-term results of the Schenker cementless femoral component].
Dzupa V; Cech O; Sesták M; Klézl Z
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2004; 71(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 15151096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cementless metal-on-metal versus ceramic-on-polyethylene hip arthroplasty in patients less than fifty years of age: a comparative study with twelve to fourteen-year follow-up.
Migaud H; Putman S; Krantz N; Vasseur L; Girard J
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 May; 93 Suppl 2():137-42. PubMed ID: 21543703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Primary aseptic revision of the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty using a cemented technique without bone graft.
Bardou-Jacquet J; Souillac V; Mouton A; Chauveaux D
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 Jun; 95(4):243-8. PubMed ID: 19523892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Charnley total hip arthroplasty with use of improved techniques of cementing. The results after a minimum of fifteen years of follow-up.
Madey SM; Callaghan JJ; Olejniczak JP; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1997 Jan; 79(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 9010186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patient activity, sports participation, and impact loading on the durability of cemented total hip replacements.
Kilgus DJ; Dorey FJ; Finerman GA; Amstutz HC
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Aug; (269):25-31. PubMed ID: 1864047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimum 20-year follow-up results of revision total hip arthroplasty with improved cementing technique.
Trumm BN; Callaghan JJ; George CA; Liu SS; Goetz DD; Johnston RC
J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jan; 29(1):236-41. PubMed ID: 23759117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term results of cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients 45 years old or younger: a 16-year follow-up study.
Sedel L
J Arthroplasty; 1995 Apr; 10(2):255-6. PubMed ID: 7798110
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Cementless total hip arthroplasty in patients fifty years of age or younger: a minimum ten-year follow-up.
Takenaga RK; Callaghan JJ; Bedard NA; Liu SS; Klaassen AL; Pedersen DR
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Dec; 94(23):2153-9. PubMed ID: 23224386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-Term Outcomes of Liner Cementation into a Stable Retained Shell: A Concise Follow-up of a Previous Report.
Tan TL; Le Duff MJ; Ebramzadeh E; Bhaurla SK; Amstutz HC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Jun; 97(11):920-4. PubMed ID: 26041853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Revision following cemented and uncemented primary total hip replacement: a seven-year analysis from the New Zealand Joint Registry.
Hooper GJ; Rothwell AG; Stringer M; Frampton C
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Apr; 91(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 19336803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of a posterior lip augmentation device for a revision of recurrent dislocation after primary cemented Charnley/Charnley Elite total hip replacement: results at a mean follow-up of six years and nine months.
McConway J; O'Brien S; Doran E; Archbold P; Beverland D
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Dec; 89(12):1581-5. PubMed ID: 18057356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Constrained acetabular liners cemented into cages during total hip revision arthroplasty.
Khoury JI; Malkani AL; Adler EM; Markel DC
J Arthroplasty; 2010 Sep; 25(6):901-5. PubMed ID: 20620017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outcome of custom-made IMP femoral components of total hip arthroplasty: a follow-up of 15 to 22 years.
Colen S; Dalemans A; Schouwenaars A; Mulier M
J Arthroplasty; 2014 Feb; 29(2):397-400. PubMed ID: 23764033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Danish Hip Arthroplasty Register.
Lucht U
Acta Orthop Scand; 2000 Oct; 71(5):433-9. PubMed ID: 11186396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
