These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1542179)
1. Clinical decision making: from theory to practice. Cost-effectiveness analysis. A conversation with my father. Eddy DM JAMA; 1992 Mar; 267(12):1669-75. PubMed ID: 1542179 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical decision making: from theory to practice. Cost-effectiveness analysis. Will it be accepted? Eddy DM JAMA; 1992 Jul; 268(1):132-6. PubMed ID: 1608100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Oregon experiment: the role of cost-benefit analysis in the allocation of Medicaid funds. Blumstein JF Soc Sci Med; 1997 Aug; 45(4):545-54. PubMed ID: 9226780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Oregon priority-setting exercise: cost-effectiveness and the rule of rescue, revisited. Hadorn D Med Decis Making; 1996; 16(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 8778529 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Retracing the Oregon trail: the experience of rationing and the Oregon health plan. Ham C BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7149):1965-9. PubMed ID: 9641942 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Setting health care priorities in Oregon. Cost-effectiveness meets the rule of rescue. Hadorn DC JAMA; 1991 May; 265(17):2218-25. PubMed ID: 1901610 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Oregon moves closer to rationing care. Politser P Bull Am Coll Surg; 1991 Sep; 76(9):38-41. PubMed ID: 10113828 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Oregon's plan. Should it be approved? Eddy DM JAMA; 1991 Nov; 266(17):2439-45. PubMed ID: 1920751 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Oregon's Medicaid ranking and cost-effectiveness: is there any relationship? Tengs TO; Meyer G; Siegel JE; Pliskin JS; Graham JD; Weinstein MC Med Decis Making; 1996; 16(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 8778541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. On the Oregon trail. Kitzhaber J; Kemmy AM Br Med Bull; 1995 Oct; 51(4):808-18. PubMed ID: 8556290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. "Some doctors have done very well". Kitzhaber J Med Econ; 1997 Jul; 74(15):48-9, 52-4, 59-63. PubMed ID: 10168789 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The Oregon Medicaid priority-setting project: the impact on poor children. Behrman RE; Larson CS Health Matrix Clevel; 1991; 1(2):235-49; discussion 251-8. PubMed ID: 10120174 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Prioritization in Swedish health care--critical analysis of the models]. Calltorp J; Holmström S Lakartidningen; 1992 Apr; 89(15):1267-9. PubMed ID: 1578991 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Setting health care priorities in Oregon. JAMA; 1991 Aug; 266(8):1080-1. PubMed ID: 1907672 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical decision making: from theory to practice. What's going on in Oregon? Eddy DM JAMA; 1991 Jul; 266(3):417-20. PubMed ID: 2056654 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Prioritising health services in an era of limits: the Oregon experience. Kitzhaber JA BMJ; 1993 Aug; 307(6900):373-7. PubMed ID: 8374424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical decision making: from theory to practice. Cost-effectiveness analysis. Is it up to the task? Eddy DM JAMA; 1992 Jun; 267(24):3342-8. PubMed ID: 1597918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]