BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1543130)

  • 1. The effectiveness of the Duo-Flo BioClean unit for controlling airborne antigen levels.
    Ziemann B; Corn M; Ansari AA; Eggleston P
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1992 Feb; 53(2):138-45. PubMed ID: 1543130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reduction of exposure to laboratory animal allergens in the workplace.
    Gordon S; Wallace J; Cook A; Tee RD; Newman Taylor AJ
    Clin Exp Allergy; 1997 Jul; 27(7):744-51. PubMed ID: 9249266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Individually ventilated caging system for effective allergen control.
    Bilecki B
    Lab Anim (NY); 2006 Apr; 35(4):44-5. PubMed ID: 16582899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reducing exposure to laboratory animal allergens.
    Schweitzer IB; Smith E; Harrison DJ; Myers DD; Eggleston PA; Stockwell JD; Paigen B; Smith AL
    Comp Med; 2003 Oct; 53(5):487-92. PubMed ID: 14655990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pilot study of directional airflow and containment of airborne particles in the size of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in an operating room.
    Olmsted RN
    Am J Infect Control; 2008 May; 36(4):260-7. PubMed ID: 18455046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Particulate matter in animal rooms housing mice in microisolation caging.
    Langham GL; Hoyt RF; Johnson TE
    J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci; 2006 Nov; 45(6):44-8. PubMed ID: 17089991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of ionic air purifiers for reducing aerosol exposure in confined indoor spaces.
    Grinshpun SA; Mainelis G; Trunov M; Adhikari A; Reponen T; Willeke K
    Indoor Air; 2005 Aug; 15(4):235-45. PubMed ID: 15982270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Controlling allergens in animal rooms by using curtains.
    Krohn TC; Itter G; Fosse R; Hansen AK
    J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci; 2006 May; 45(3):51-3. PubMed ID: 16642971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Performance of personal inhalable aerosol samplers in very slowly moving air when facing the aerosol source.
    Witschger O; Grinshpun SA; Fauvel S; Basso G
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2004 Jun; 48(4):351-68. PubMed ID: 15191944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Organic dust exposures from work in dairy barns.
    Kullman GJ; Thorne PS; Waldron PF; Marx JJ; Ault B; Lewis DM; Siegel PD; Olenchock SA; Merchant JA
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1998 Jun; 59(6):403-13. PubMed ID: 9670470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A comparison of total, respirable, and real-time airborne particulate sampling in horse barns.
    Rosenthal FS; Gruntman A; Couetil LL
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2006 Nov; 3(11):599-605. PubMed ID: 17086664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Application of porous foams for size-selective measurements of airborne wheat allergen.
    Bogdanovic J; de Pater AJ; Doekes G; Wouters IM; Heederik DJ
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2006 Mar; 50(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 16148015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Air quality in an animal facility: particulates, ammonia, and volatile organic compounds.
    Kacergis JB; Jones RB; Reeb CK; Turner WA; Ohman JL; Ardman MR; Paigen B
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1996 Jul; 57(7):634-40. PubMed ID: 8686660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Chronic exposure of pigs to airborne dust and endotoxins in an environmental chamber: technical note.
    Urbain B; Prouvost JF; Beerens D; Michel O; Nicks B; Ansay M; Gustin P
    Vet Res; 1996; 27(6):569-78. PubMed ID: 8956472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Latex aeroallergen quantification in hospitals of Moscow, Russia.
    Swanson M; Zakharov S; Luss L; Babakhin A; DuBuske L
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2001 Oct; 87(4):307-10. PubMed ID: 11686423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Indoor air quality in two urban elementary schools--measurements of airborne fungi, carpet allergens, CO2, temperature, and relative humidity.
    Ramachandran G; Adgate JL; Banerjee S; Church TR; Jones D; Fredrickson A; Sexton K
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Nov; 2(11):553-66. PubMed ID: 16223714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of countermeasures for reduction of mouse airborne allergens.
    Sakaguchi M; Inouye S; Miyazawa H; Kamimura H; Kimura M; Yamazaki S
    Lab Anim Sci; 1990 Nov; 40(6):613-5. PubMed ID: 2172625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Field evaluation of nanofilm detectors for measuring acidic particles in indoor and outdoor air.
    Cohen BS; Heikkinen MS; Hazi Y; Gao H; Peters P; Lippmann M
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2004 Sep; (121):1-35; discussion 37-46. PubMed ID: 15553489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of individually ventilated cage systems for laboratory rodents: occupational health aspects.
    Renström A; Björing G; Höglund AU
    Lab Anim; 2001 Jan; 35(1):42-50. PubMed ID: 11201287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Task-related variation in airborne concentrations of laboratory animal allergens: studies with Rat n I.
    Eggleston PA; Newill CA; Ansari AA; Pustelnik A; Lou SR; Evans R; Marsh DG; Longbottom JL; Corn M
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1989 Sep; 84(3):347-52. PubMed ID: 2778241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.