These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1543476)

  • 1. [Observations during captive bolt stunning of rabbits].
    Schütt-Abraham I; Knauer-Kraetzl B; Wormuth HJ
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1992 Jan; 105(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 1543476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Head-only followed by cardiac arrest electrical stunning is an effective alternative to head-only electrical stunning in pigs.
    Vogel KD; Badtram G; Claus JR; Grandin T; Turpin S; Weyker RE; Voogd E
    J Anim Sci; 2011 May; 89(5):1412-8. PubMed ID: 21183712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a pneumatically operated captive bolt for stunning/killing broiler chickens.
    Raj AB; O'Callaghan M
    Br Poult Sci; 2001 Jul; 42(3):295-9. PubMed ID: 11469546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reduction of the occurrence of incorrect stunning and the occurrence of reflexes and reactions in cattle after pneumatically powered captive-bolt stunning in comparison with cartridge-fired captive-bolt stunning.
    Kaluza M; Vecerek V; Voslarova E; Kamenik J; Konvalinova J; Valkova L; Takacova D
    Anim Sci J; 2022; 93(1):e13728. PubMed ID: 35470517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Killing of experimental rabbits with captive bolt guns according to animal welfare regulations].
    Holtzmann M
    J Exp Anim Sci; 1991; 34(5-6):203-6. PubMed ID: 1814467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of indicators used to assess unconsciousness in veal calves at slaughter.
    Verhoeven MT; Gerritzen MA; Hellebrekers LJ; Kemp B
    Animal; 2016 Sep; 10(9):1457-65. PubMed ID: 26965337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of nonpenetrating captive bolt stunning followed by electrical induction of cardiac arrest in veal calves.
    Bartz B; Collins M; Stoddard G; Appleton A; Livingood R; Sobcynski H; Vogel KD
    J Anim Sci; 2015 Sep; 93(9):4557-63. PubMed ID: 26440354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of electrical stun/kill method, interval between killing and neck cutting and blood vessels cut on blood loss and meat quality in broilers.
    Raj AB; Wilkins LJ; O'Callaghan M; Phillips AJ
    Br Poult Sci; 2001 Mar; 42(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 11337968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A note comparing the welfare of Zebu cattle following three stunning-slaughter methods.
    Neves JE; Paranhos da Costa MJ; Roça RO; Faucitano L; Gregory NG
    Meat Sci; 2016 Jul; 117():41-3. PubMed ID: 26946474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cattle stunning with a penetrative captive bolt device: A review.
    Kamenik J; Paral V; Pyszko M; Voslarova E
    Anim Sci J; 2019 Mar; 90(3):307-316. PubMed ID: 30669179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pathophysiology of penetrating captive bolt stunning in Alpacas (Vicugna pacos).
    Gibson TJ; Whitehead C; Taylor R; Sykes O; Chancellor NM; Limon G
    Meat Sci; 2015 Feb; 100():227-31. PubMed ID: 25460130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cortical function in cattle during slaughter: conventional captive bolt stunning followed by exsanguination compared with shechita slaughter.
    Daly CC; Kallweit E; Ellendorf F
    Vet Rec; 1988 Apr; 122(14):325-9. PubMed ID: 3381436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Return-to-sensibility problems after penetrating captive bolt stunning of cattle in commercial beef slaughter plants.
    Grandin T
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2002 Nov; 221(9):1258-61. PubMed ID: 12418689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of a newly designed double-barreled bullet-shooting stunner for adequate stunning of water buffaloes.
    Gascho D; Stephan R; Bauer C; Oesch MA; Richter H
    Meat Sci; 2022 Nov; 193():108933. PubMed ID: 35961127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An evaluation of the effectiveness of handheld stunners for stunning chickens.
    Gregory NG; Wotton SB
    Vet Rec; 1990 Mar; 126(12):290-1. PubMed ID: 2343512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of poll stunning water buffalo with captive bolt guns.
    Gregory NG; Spence JY; Mason CW; Tinarwo A; Heasman L
    Meat Sci; 2009 Jan; 81(1):178-82. PubMed ID: 22063979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electroencephalographic assessment of concussive non-penetrative captive bolt stunning of turkeys.
    Gibson TJ; Rebelo CB; Gowers TA; Chancellor NM
    Br Poult Sci; 2018 Feb; 59(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 29099622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficiency of low versus high airline pressure in stunning cattle with a pneumatically powered penetrating captive bolt gun.
    Oliveira SEO; Gregory NG; Dalla Costa FA; Gibson TJ; Paranhos da Costa MJR
    Meat Sci; 2017 Aug; 130():64-68. PubMed ID: 28433852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of the shooting position on the stunning of calves by captive bolt.
    Lambooy E; Spanjaard W
    Vet Rec; 1981 Oct; 109(16):359-61. PubMed ID: 7324352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Investigation Into the Humaneness of Slaughter Methods for Guinea Pigs (Cavia porcelus) in the Andean Region.
    Limon G; Gonzales-Gustavson EA; Gibson TJ
    J Appl Anim Welf Sci; 2016; 19(3):280-93. PubMed ID: 26963642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.