These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1544025)

  • 1. Beyond anatomical dolls: professionals' use of other play therapy techniques.
    Kendall-Tackett KA
    Child Abuse Negl; 1992; 16(1):139-42. PubMed ID: 1544025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Professionals' standards of "normal" behavior with anatomical dolls and factors that influence these standards.
    Kendall-Tackett KA
    Child Abuse Negl; 1992; 16(5):727-33. PubMed ID: 1393731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of anatomical dolls as assessment and evidentiary tools.
    Lie GY; Inman A
    Soc Work; 1991 Sep; 36(5):396-9. PubMed ID: 1925700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigative interviews of alleged sexual abuse victims with and without anatomical dolls.
    Lamb ME; Hershkowitz I; Sternberg KJ; Boat B; Everson MD
    Child Abuse Negl; 1996 Dec; 20(12):1251-9. PubMed ID: 8985616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Psychological science and the use of anatomically detailed dolls in child sexual-abuse assessments.
    Koocher GP; Goodman GS; White CS; Friedrich WN; Sivan AB; Reynolds CR
    Psychol Bull; 1995 Sep; 118(2):199-222. PubMed ID: 7568570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Use of anatomical dolls among professionals in sexual abuse evaluations.
    Boat BW; Everson MD
    Child Abuse Negl; 1988; 12(2):171-9. PubMed ID: 3395893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of anatomical dolls by Boston-area professionals.
    Kendall-Tackett KA; Watson MW
    Child Abuse Negl; 1992; 16(3):423-8. PubMed ID: 1617476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of nonanatomical dolls in the sexual abuse interview.
    Britton HL; O'Keefe MA
    Child Abuse Negl; 1991; 15(4):567-73. PubMed ID: 1959088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Anatomical doll play of preschoolers referred for sexual abuse and those not referred.
    Cohn DS
    Child Abuse Negl; 1991; 15(4):455-66. PubMed ID: 1959077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sexualized doll play among young children: implications for the use of anatomical dolls in sexual abuse evaluations.
    Everson MD; Boat BW
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 1990 Sep; 29(5):736-42. PubMed ID: 2228926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anatomical dolls: their use in assessment of children who may have been sexually abused.
    Faller KC
    J Child Sex Abus; 2005; 14(3):1-21. PubMed ID: 16203692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assumptions and beliefs about the role of AD dolls in child sexual abuse validation interviews: are they supported empirically?
    Skinner LJ
    Behav Sci Law; 1996; 14(2):167-85. PubMed ID: 10160234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Health care and female survivors of childhood sexual abuse: health professionals' perspectives.
    McGregor K; Gautam J; Glover M; Jülich S
    J Child Sex Abus; 2013; 22(6):761-75. PubMed ID: 23924181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The response of young, non-sexually abused children to anatomically correct dolls.
    Glaser D; Collins C
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 1989 Jul; 30(4):547-60. PubMed ID: 2768357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Childhood sexual behavior as an indicator of sexual abuse: professionals' criteria and biases].
    González Ortega E; Orgaz Baz B; López Sánchez F
    Psicothema; 2012; 24(3):402-9. PubMed ID: 22748731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Women who experience domestic violence and women survivors of childhood sexual abuse: a survey of health professionals' attitudes and clinical practice.
    Richardson J; Feder G; Eldridge S; Chung WS; Coid J; Moorey S
    Br J Gen Pract; 2001 Jun; 51(467):468-70. PubMed ID: 11407053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating children's reports of sexual abuse: results from a survey of professionals.
    Conte JR; Sorenson E; Fogarty L; Dalla Rosa J
    Am J Orthopsychiatry; 1991 Jul; 61(3):428-37. PubMed ID: 1951650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Putting the anatomical doll controversy in perspective: an examination of the major uses and criticisms of the dolls in child sexual abuse evaluations.
    Everson MD; Boat BW
    Child Abuse Negl; 1994 Feb; 18(2):113-29. PubMed ID: 8199895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Specificity and sensitivity of sexually anatomically correct dolls in substantiating abuse: a pilot study.
    Realmuto GM; Jensen JB; Wescoe S
    J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 1990 Sep; 29(5):743-6. PubMed ID: 2228927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Developmental differences in the function and use of anatomical dolls during interviews with alleged sexual abuse victims.
    Thierry KL; Lamb ME; Orbach Y; Pipe ME
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2005 Dec; 73(6):1125-34. PubMed ID: 16392985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.