These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1544097)

  • 1. Physical examination of the breast.
    Winchester DP
    Cancer; 1992 Apr; 69(7 Suppl):1947-9. PubMed ID: 1544097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical breast examination and breast self-examination. Past and present effect on breast cancer survival.
    Foster RS; Worden JK; Costanza MC; Solomon LJ
    Cancer; 1992 Apr; 69(7 Suppl):1992-8. PubMed ID: 1544105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of breast mammography, sonography and physical examination for screening women at high risk of breast cancer in taiwan.
    Hou MF; Chuang HY; Ou-Yang F; Wang CY; Huang CL; Fan HM; Chuang CH; Wang JY; Hsieh JS; Liu GC; Huang TJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2002 Apr; 28(4):415-20. PubMed ID: 12049952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implementation of breast cancer screening.
    Pisano ED; McLelland R
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):579-87. PubMed ID: 1909543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term impact of previous breast biopsy on breast cancer screening modalities.
    Goff JM; Molloy M; Debbas MT; Hale DA; Jaques DP
    J Surg Oncol; 1995 May; 59(1):18-20. PubMed ID: 7745971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast cancer screening for women younger than 40.
    Gili AF; Poonja Z; Kalra BB
    Can Fam Physician; 1993 Jan; 39():65-72. PubMed ID: 8435564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High detection rate of breast cancer by mass screening using mammography in Japan.
    Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Harada K; Sagara Y
    Jpn J Cancer Res; 1994 Dec; 85(12):1193-5. PubMed ID: 7852181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Method of discovery of breast cancer.
    Benedict S; Williams RD; Hoomani J
    Cancer Pract; 1996; 4(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 8826143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical and self breast examination remain important in the era of modern screening.
    Ma I; Dueck A; Gray R; Wasif N; Giurescu M; Lorans R; Pizzitola V; Pockaj B
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 May; 19(5):1484-90. PubMed ID: 22160521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of breast consistency at palpation with breast density at mammography.
    Boren WL; Hunter TB; Bjelland JC; Hunt KR
    Invest Radiol; 1990 Sep; 25(9):1010-1. PubMed ID: 2211041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mammography versus clinical examination of the breasts.
    Baines CJ; Miller AB
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1997; (22):125-9. PubMed ID: 9709288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diaphanography in the diagnosis of breast cancer.
    Drexler B; Davis JL; Schofield G
    Radiology; 1985 Oct; 157(1):41-4. PubMed ID: 4034975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Canadian National Breast Screening Study-1: breast cancer mortality after 11 to 16 years of follow-up. A randomized screening trial of mammography in women age 40 to 49 years.
    Miller AB; To T; Baines CJ; Wall C
    Ann Intern Med; 2002 Sep; 137(5 Part 1):305-12. PubMed ID: 12204013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Screening for breast cancer.
    Miller AB
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 1983; 3(2):143-56. PubMed ID: 6351949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Characteristics of screening-detected breast cancer and trends in its therapy].
    Taguchi T; Shiba E; Takai S; Taguchi T
    Gan To Kagaku Ryoho; 1998 Aug; 25(10):1493-8. PubMed ID: 9725039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is mammography screening for breast cancer really not justifiable?
    Miller AB
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 2003; 163():115-28; discussion 264-6. PubMed ID: 12903848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mammography: who, when, and why?
    Markle JT; Massman JE
    J Med Assoc Ga; 1995 Sep; 84(7):335-7. PubMed ID: 7561543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years.
    Miller AB; Baines CJ; To T; Wall C
    CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(10):1459-76. PubMed ID: 1423087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The quality of mass screening for breast cancer by physical examination.
    Morimoto T; Komaki K; Mori T; Sasa M; Ooshimo K; Miki H; Monden Y; Inui K; Saoyama N; Yoshida H
    Surg Today; 1993; 23(3):200-4. PubMed ID: 8467170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years.
    Miller AB; Baines CJ; To T; Wall C
    CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(10):1477-88. PubMed ID: 1423088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.