These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1544359)

  • 1. Shrinkage and psychophysical load ratings in self-paced and force-paced lifting work and during recovery.
    Stålhammar HR; Leskinen TP; Rautanen MT; Troup JD
    Ergonomics; 1992 Jan; 35(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 1544359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanically and electromyographically assessed load on the spine in self-paced and force-paced lifting work.
    Leskinen TP; Stålhammar HR; Rautanen MT; Troup JD
    Ergonomics; 1992; 35(7-8):881-8. PubMed ID: 1633794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of asymmetric dynamic and isometric liftings on strength/force and rating of perceived exertion.
    Hattori Y; Ono Y; Shimaoka M; Hiruta S; Kamijima M; Shibata E; Ichihara G; Ando S; Villaneuva MB; Takeuchi Y
    Ergonomics; 1996 Jun; 39(6):862-76. PubMed ID: 8681928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Studies of spinal shrinkage to evaluate low-back loading in the workplace.
    McGill SM; van Wijk MJ; Axler CT; Gletsu M
    Ergonomics; 1996 Jan; 39(1):92-102. PubMed ID: 8851075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spine loading as a function of lift frequency, exposure duration, and work experience.
    Marras WS; Parakkat J; Chany AM; Yang G; Burr D; Lavender SA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 May; 21(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 16310299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physiological and spinal responses to circuit weight-training.
    Garbutt G; Boocock MG; Reilly T; Troup JD
    Ergonomics; 1994 Jan; 37(1):117-25. PubMed ID: 8112266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Occupational lifting by nursing aides and warehouse workers.
    Ljungberg AS; Kilbom A; Hägg GM
    Ergonomics; 1989 Jan; 32(1):59-78. PubMed ID: 2924762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Spinal shrinkage as a parameter of functional load.
    van Dieën JH; Toussaint HM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Sep; 18(11):1504-14. PubMed ID: 8235823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in stature following drop jumping and post-exercise gravity inversion.
    Boocock MG; Garbutt G; Linge K; Reilly T; Troup JD
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1990 Jun; 22(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 2381307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effects of lifting speed on the peak external forward bending, lateral bending, and twisting spine moments.
    Lavender SA; Li YC; Andersson GB; Natarajan RN
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):111-25. PubMed ID: 9973875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of working technique on physical loads - an exposure profile among newspaper editors.
    Lindegård A; Wahlström J; Hagberg M; Hansson GA; Jonsson P; Wigaeus Tornqvist E
    Ergonomics; 2003 May; 46(6):598-615. PubMed ID: 12745690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spinal shrinkage in unloaded and loaded drop-jumping.
    Fowler NE; Lees A; Reilly T
    Ergonomics; 1994 Jan; 37(1):133-9. PubMed ID: 8112268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maximum acceptable weights for asymmetric lifting of Chinese females.
    Wu SP
    Appl Ergon; 2003 May; 34(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 12737921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spine loading during asymmetric lifting using one versus two hands.
    Marras WS; Davis KG
    Ergonomics; 1998 Jun; 41(6):817-34. PubMed ID: 9629066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of lift frequency, lift duration and work experience on discomfort reporting.
    Parakkat J; Yang G; Chany AM; Burr D; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 2007 Mar; 50(3):396-409. PubMed ID: 17536776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An investigation of perceived exertion via whole body exertion and direct muscle force indicators during the determination of the maximum acceptable weight of lift.
    Davis KG; Jorgensen MJ; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 2000 Feb; 43(2):143-59. PubMed ID: 10675055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of carrying methods and box handles on two-person team carrying capacity for females.
    Wu SP; Chang SY
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Jul; 41(4):615-9. PubMed ID: 20116781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of isokinetic lifting strength with static strength and maximum acceptable weight with special reference to speed of lifting.
    Garg A; Beller D
    Ergonomics; 1994 Aug; 37(8):1363-74. PubMed ID: 7925260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neuromuscular fatigue and recovery in women at different ages during heavy resistance loading.
    Häkkinen K
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1995 Nov; 35(7):403-13. PubMed ID: 8549431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of work experience, lift frequency and exposure duration on low back muscle oxygenation.
    Yang G; Chany AM; Parakkat J; Burr D; Marras WS
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Jan; 22(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 16996665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.