200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1544608)
1. Comparison of the local lymph node assay with the guinea-pig maximization test for the detection of a range of contact allergens.
Basketter DA; Scholes EW
Food Chem Toxicol; 1992 Jan; 30(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 1544608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of dose-responses of contact allergens using the guinea pig maximization test and the local lymph node assay.
van Och FM; Vandebriel RJ; Prinsen MK; De Jong WH; Slob W; van Loveren H
Toxicology; 2001 Oct; 167(3):207-15. PubMed ID: 11578800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of contact sensitivity of four thiourea rubber accelerators: comparison of two mouse lymph node assays with the guinea pig maximization test.
Ikarashi Y; Ohno K; Momma J; Tsuchiya T; Nakamura A
Food Chem Toxicol; 1994 Nov; 32(11):1067-72. PubMed ID: 7959462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment of the skin sensitization potency of eugenol and its dimers using a non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.
Takeyoshi M; Noda S; Yamazaki S; Kakishima H; Yamasaki K; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 2004; 24(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 14745850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The performance of the local lymph node assay with chemicals identified as contact allergens in the human maximization test.
Basketter DA; Scholes EW; Kimber I
Food Chem Toxicol; 1994 Jun; 32(6):543-7. PubMed ID: 8045461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Chemical applicability domain of the Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA) for skin sensitisation potency. Part 3. Apparent discrepancies between LLNA and GPMT sensitisation potential: False positives or differences in sensitivity?
Roberts DW; Schultz TW; Api AM
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2016 Oct; 80():260-7. PubMed ID: 27477089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative comparison of the results obtained by the multiple-dose guinea pig maximization test and the non-radioactive murine local lymph-node assay for various biocides.
Yamano T; Shimizu M; Noda T
Toxicology; 2005 Jul; 211(1-2):165-75. PubMed ID: 15863260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Skin sensitization testing in potency and risk assessment.
Kimber I; Basketter DA; Berthold K; Butler M; Garrigue JL; Lea L; Newsome C; Roggeband R; Steiling W; Stropp G; Waterman S; Wiemann C
Toxicol Sci; 2001 Feb; 59(2):198-208. PubMed ID: 11158712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of the local lymph node assay in the evaluation of the sensitizing potential of pharmaceutical process intermediates.
Durand G; de Burlet G; Virat M; Nauman BD
Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Sep; 49(3):148-54. PubMed ID: 14678211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Application of BALB/c mouse in the local lymph node assay:BrdU-ELISA for the prediction of the skin sensitizing potential of chemicals.
Hou F; Xing C; Li B; Cheng J; Chen W; Zhang M
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2015; 72():53-8. PubMed ID: 25600862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Skin sensitization potency and cross-reactivity of p-phenylenediamine and its derivatives evaluated by non-radioactive murine local lymph node assay and guinea-pig maximization test.
Yamano T; Shimizu M
Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Apr; 60(4):193-8. PubMed ID: 19338586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the skin sensitizing potential of unsaturated compounds as assessed by the murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) and the guinea pig maximization test (GPMT).
Kreiling R; Hollnagel HM; Hareng L; Eigler D; Lee MS; Griem P; Dreessen B; Kleber M; Albrecht A; Garcia C; Wendel A
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Jun; 46(6):1896-904. PubMed ID: 18343554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Novel approach for classifying chemicals according to skin sensitizing potency by non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.
Takeyoshi M; Iida K; Shiraishi K; Hoshuyama S
J Appl Toxicol; 2005; 25(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 15744759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The local lymph node assay: results of a final inter-laboratory validation under field conditions.
Scholes EW; Basketter DA; Sarll AE; Kimber I; Evans CD; Miller K; Robbins MC; Harrison PT; Waite SJ
J Appl Toxicol; 1992 Jun; 12(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 1629518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Contact allergenic potency: correlation of human and local lymph node assay data.
Gerberick GF; Robinson MK; Ryan CA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Basketter DA; Wright Z; Marks JG
Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Sep; 12(3):156-61. PubMed ID: 11526521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An evaluation of the suitability of benzocaine as a positive control skin sensitizer.
Basketter DA; Scholes EW; Wahlkvist H; Montelius J
Contact Dermatitis; 1995 Jul; 33(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 7493458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative relationship between the local lymph node assay and human skin sensitization assays.
Schneider K; Akkan Z
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2004 Jun; 39(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 15135206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Unsaturated fatty acids show clear elicitation responses in a modified local lymph node assay with an elicitation phase, and test positive in the direct peptide reactivity assay.
Yamashita K; Shinoda S; Hagiwara S; Miyazaki H; Itagaki H
J Toxicol Sci; 2015 Dec; 40(6):843-53. PubMed ID: 26558466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Experimental study for the development of an in vitro test for contact allergens. 2. Comparison of the in vitro sensitization test with the guinea pig maximization test for contact allergens.
Arimura M; Yokozeki H; Katayama I; Nakamura T; Masuda M; Nishioka K
Int Arch Allergy Immunol; 1998 Mar; 115(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 9531165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Local lymph node assay: use in hazard and risk assessment.
Dearman RJ; Basketter DA; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 1999; 19(5):299-306. PubMed ID: 10513674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
