These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15446298)
1. Have standardized patient examinations stood the test of time and experience? Williams RG Teach Learn Med; 2004; 16(2):215-22. PubMed ID: 15446298 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Assessment of clinical skills with standardized patients: state of the art revisited. Swanson DB; van der Vleuten CP Teach Learn Med; 2013; 25 Suppl 1():S17-25. PubMed ID: 24246102 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of task exposure on repeat candidate scores in a high-stakes standardized patient assessment. Boulet JR; McKinley DW; Whelan GP; Hambleton RK Teach Learn Med; 2003; 15(4):227-32. PubMed ID: 14612253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessment in medical education. de Galan BE; van Gurp PJ; Stuyt PM N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(20):2108-9; author reply 2110. PubMed ID: 17514782 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment in medical education. Epstein RM N Engl J Med; 2007 Jan; 356(4):387-96. PubMed ID: 17251535 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Training and assessment in obstetrics: the role of simulation. Ennen CS; Satin AJ Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Dec; 24(6):747-58. PubMed ID: 20537592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Status of standardized patient assessment series. Colliver JA Teach Learn Med; 2003; 15(4):226. PubMed ID: 14612252 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. An experimental comparison of rater performance on an SP-based clinical skills exam. Han JJ; Kreiter CD; Park H; Ferguson KJ Teach Learn Med; 2006; 18(4):304-9. PubMed ID: 17144834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Procedures for establishing defensible absolute passing scores on performance examinations in health professions education. Downing SM; Tekian A; Yudkowsky R Teach Learn Med; 2006; 18(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 16354141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Competency assessment in simulation-based procedural education. Michelson JD; Manning L Am J Surg; 2008 Oct; 196(4):609-15. PubMed ID: 18614142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Developing a support system for teaching and assessing clinical competence. Battles JB; Sprankell SJ; Carpenter JL; Bedford JA; Kirk LM J Biocommun; 1992; 19(4):19-25. PubMed ID: 1468998 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Team OSCEs: evaluation methodology or educational encounter? Marshall D; Hall P; Taniguchi A Med Educ; 2008 Nov; 42(11):1129-30. PubMed ID: 18991985 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The relationship between experience with standardized patient examinations and subsequent standardized patient examination performance: a potential problem with standardized patient exam validity. Talente G; Haist SA; Wilson JF Eval Health Prof; 2007 Mar; 30(1):64-74. PubMed ID: 17293609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using standardized patient outcome to measure the effect of teaching asthma-related patient education and information-giving skills to medical students. Lo Sasso AA; Lane JL; Malloy RB Teach Learn Med; 2005; 17(3):228-32. PubMed ID: 16042517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Direct observation in medical education: a review of the literature and evidence for validity. Fromme HB; Karani R; Downing SM Mt Sinai J Med; 2009 Aug; 76(4):365-71. PubMed ID: 19642150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Integrating the core competencies: proceedings from the 2005 Academic Assembly Consortium. Sokolosky MC Acad Emerg Med; 2007 Jun; 14(6):585. PubMed ID: 17535982 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Simulators in interventional radiology training and evaluation: a paradigm shift is on the horizon. Patel AA; Gould DA J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2006 Nov; 17(11 Pt 2):S163-73. PubMed ID: 17142699 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of standardized patients in medical education. Nagoshi MH Hawaii Med J; 2001 Dec; 60(12):323-4. PubMed ID: 11836971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reliability and validity of checklists and global ratings by standardized students, trained raters, and faculty raters in an objective structured teaching environment. Quirk M; Mazor K; Haley HL; Wellman S; Keller D; Hatem D; Keller LA Teach Learn Med; 2005; 17(3):202-9. PubMed ID: 16042515 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]