189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15446786)
1. Effect of area x-ray beam equalization on image quality and dose in digital mammography.
Wong J; Xu T; Husain A; Le H; Molloi S
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Aug; 49(16):3539-57. PubMed ID: 15446786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of exposure equalization on image signal-to-noise ratios in digital mammography: a simulation study with an anthropomorphic breast phantom.
Liu X; Lai CJ; Whitman GJ; Geiser WR; Shen Y; Yi Y; Shaw CC
Med Phys; 2011 Dec; 38(12):6489-501. PubMed ID: 22149832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Using aluminum for scatter control in mammography: preliminary work using measurements of CNR and FOM.
Al Khalifah K; Davidson R; Zhou A
Radiol Phys Technol; 2020 Mar; 13(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 31749130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Area x-ray beam equalization for digital angiography.
Molloi S; Tang J; Mather T; Zhou Y
Med Phys; 1999 Dec; 26(12):2684-92. PubMed ID: 10619254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Practical application of a scan-rotate equalization geometry to mammography.
Sabol JM; Soutar IC; Plewes DB
Med Phys; 1996 Dec; 23(12):1987-96. PubMed ID: 8994163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system.
Huda W; Sajewicz AM; Ogden KM; Dance DR
Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):442-8. PubMed ID: 12674245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Image quality, threshold contrast and mean glandular dose in CR mammography.
Jakubiak RR; Gamba HR; Neves EB; Peixoto JE
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6565-83. PubMed ID: 24002695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimal beam quality selection based on contrast-to-noise ratio and mean glandular dose in digital mammography.
Aminah M; Ng KH; Abdullah BJ; Jamal N
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2010 Dec; 33(4):329-34. PubMed ID: 20938762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reduction in x-ray scatter and radiation dose for volume-of-interest (VOI) cone-beam breast CT--a phantom study.
Lai CJ; Chen L; Zhang H; Liu X; Zhong Y; Shen Y; Han T; Ge S; Yi Y; Wang T; Yang WT; Whitman GJ; Shaw CC
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Nov; 54(21):6691-709. PubMed ID: 19841514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of the antiscatter grid on full-field digital mammography phantom images.
Chakraborty DP
J Digit Imaging; 1999 Feb; 12(1):12-22. PubMed ID: 10036663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dose optimization in pediatric cardiac x-ray imaging.
Gislason AJ; Davies AG; Cowen AR
Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5258-69. PubMed ID: 21089760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A framework for optimising the radiographic technique in digital X-ray imaging.
Samei E; Dobbins JT; Lo JY; Tornai MP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):220-9. PubMed ID: 15933112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Algorithmic scatter correction in dual-energy digital mammography.
Chen X; Nishikawa RM; Chan ST; Lau BA; Zhang L; Mou X
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111919. PubMed ID: 24320452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantitative contrast-enhanced mammography for contrast medium kinetics studies.
Arvanitis CD; Speller R
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(20):6041-64. PubMed ID: 19779213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Area beam equalization: optimization and performance of an automated prototype system for chest radiography.
Xu T; Shikhaliev PM; Berenji GR; Tehranzadeh J; Saremi F; Molloi S
Acad Radiol; 2004 Apr; 11(4):377-89. PubMed ID: 15109010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cone-beam breast computed tomography with a displaced flat panel detector array.
Mettivier G; Russo P; Lanconelli N; Meo SL
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2805-19. PubMed ID: 22559652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimization of the exposure parameters in digital mammography using contrast-detail metrics.
Rojas LJ; Fausto AMF; Mol AW; Velasco FG; Abreu POS; Henriques G; Furquim TAC
Phys Med; 2017 Oct; 42():13-18. PubMed ID: 29173906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Low dose high energy x-ray in-line phase sensitive imaging prototype: Investigation of optimal geometric conditions and design parameters.
Ghani MU; Yan A; Wong MD; Li Y; Ren L; Wu X; Liu H
J Xray Sci Technol; 2015; 23(6):667-82. PubMed ID: 26756405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dual-energy digital mammography for calcification imaging: scatter and nonuniformity corrections.
Kappadath SC; Shaw CC
Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3395-408. PubMed ID: 16372415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Monochromatic mammography using scanning multilayer X-ray mirrors.
Windt DL
Rev Sci Instrum; 2018 Aug; 89(8):083702. PubMed ID: 30184654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
