These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Evaluation of similarity measures for searching the dictionary of natural products database. Whittle M; Willett P; Klaffke W; van Noort P J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(2):449-57. PubMed ID: 12653508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. New methods for ligand-based virtual screening: use of data fusion and machine learning to enhance the effectiveness of similarity searching. Hert J; Willett P; Wilton DJ; Acklin P; Azzaoui K; Jacoby E; Schuffenhauer A J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):462-70. PubMed ID: 16562973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of data fusion methods in virtual screening: similarity and group fusion. Whittle M; Gillet VJ; Willett P; Loesel J J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2206-19. PubMed ID: 17125165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of 2D similarity and 3D superposition. Application to searching a conformational drug database. Thimm M; Goede A; Hougardy S; Preissner R J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(5):1816-22. PubMed ID: 15446841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Random or rational design? Evaluation of diverse compound subsets from chemical structure databases. Pötter T; Matter H J Med Chem; 1998 Feb; 41(4):478-88. PubMed ID: 9484498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. "Bayes affinity fingerprints" improve retrieval rates in virtual screening and define orthogonal bioactivity space: when are multitarget drugs a feasible concept? Bender A; Jenkins JL; Glick M; Deng Z; Nettles JH; Davies JW J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2445-56. PubMed ID: 17125186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Scaffold hopping using two-dimensional fingerprints: true potential, black magic, or a hopeless endeavor? Guidelines for virtual screening. Vogt M; Stumpfe D; Geppert H; Bajorath J J Med Chem; 2010 Aug; 53(15):5707-15. PubMed ID: 20684607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Training similarity measures for specific activities: application to reduced graphs. Birchall K; Gillet VJ; Harper G; Pickett SD J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):577-86. PubMed ID: 16562986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of belief theory to similarity data fusion for use in analog searching and lead hopping. Muchmore SW; Debe DA; Metz JT; Brown SP; Martin YC; Hajduk PJ J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):941-8. PubMed ID: 18416545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Integrating structure- and ligand-based virtual screening: comparison of individual, parallel, and fused molecular docking and similarity search calculations on multiple targets. Tan L; Geppert H; Sisay MT; Gütschow M; Bajorath J ChemMedChem; 2008 Oct; 3(10):1566-71. PubMed ID: 18651695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Similarity searching of chemical databases using atom environment descriptors (MOLPRINT 2D): evaluation of performance. Bender A; Mussa HY; Glen RC; Reiling S J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(5):1708-18. PubMed ID: 15446830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Virtual screening for R-groups, including predicted pIC50 contributions, within large structural databases, using Topomer CoMFA. Cramer RD; Cruz P; Stahl G; Curtiss WC; Campbell B; Masek BB; Soltanshahi F J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Nov; 48(11):2180-95. PubMed ID: 18956863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Introduction of a generally applicable method to estimate retrieval of active molecules for similarity searching using fingerprints. Vogt M; Bajorath J ChemMedChem; 2007 Sep; 2(9):1311-20. PubMed ID: 17562536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. "Lead hopping". Validation of topomer similarity as a superior predictor of similar biological activities. Cramer RD; Jilek RJ; Guessregen S; Clark SJ; Wendt B; Clark RD J Med Chem; 2004 Dec; 47(27):6777-91. PubMed ID: 15615527 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]