These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15447022)

  • 1. Reconstruction of optical properties of low-scattering tissue using derivative estimated through perturbation Monte-Carlo method.
    Kumar YP; Vasu RM
    J Biomed Opt; 2004; 9(5):1002-12. PubMed ID: 15447022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diffuse optical tomography using intensity measurements and the a priori acquired regions of interest: theory and simulations.
    Kanmani B; Vasu RM
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jan; 50(2):247-64. PubMed ID: 15742942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hybrid radiative-transfer-diffusion model for optical tomography.
    Tarvainen T; Vauhkonen M; Kolehmainen V; Kaipio JP
    Appl Opt; 2005 Feb; 44(6):876-86. PubMed ID: 15751677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diffuse optical tomography through solving a system of quadratic equations: theory and simulations.
    Kanmani B; Vasu RM
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Feb; 51(4):981-98. PubMed ID: 16467591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of truncated total least squares with Tikhonov regularization in imaging by ultrasound inverse scattering.
    Liu C; Wang Y; Heng PA
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Aug; 48(15):2437-51. PubMed ID: 12953908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of simplified Monte Carlo simulation and diffusion approximation for the fluorescence signal from phantoms with typical mouse tissue optical properties.
    Ma G; Delorme JF; Gallant P; Boas DA
    Appl Opt; 2007 Apr; 46(10):1686-92. PubMed ID: 17356611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Joint sparsity-driven non-iterative simultaneous reconstruction of absorption and scattering in diffuse optical tomography.
    Lee O; Ye JC
    Opt Express; 2013 Nov; 21(22):26589-604. PubMed ID: 24216880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implementation of a phase array diffuse optical tomographic imager.
    Rajan K; Vijayakumar V; Biswas SK; Vasu RM
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2008 Aug; 79(8):084301. PubMed ID: 19044366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spatially varying optical and acoustic property reconstruction using finite-element-based photoacoustic tomography.
    Jiang H; Yuan Z; Gu X
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2006 Apr; 23(4):878-88. PubMed ID: 16604770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A modelling error approach for the estimation of optical absorption in the presence of anisotropies.
    Heino J; Somersalo E
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Oct; 49(20):4785-98. PubMed ID: 15566175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Advanced modelling of optical coherence tomography systems.
    Andersen PE; Thrane L; Yura HT; Tycho A; Jørgensen TM; Frosz MH
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Apr; 49(7):1307-27. PubMed ID: 15128207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reconstructing absorption and diffusion shape profiles in optical tomography by a level set technique.
    Schweiger M; Arridge SR; Dorn O; Zacharopoulos A; Kolehmainen V
    Opt Lett; 2006 Feb; 31(4):471-3. PubMed ID: 16496890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Monte Carlo simulation of time-dependent, transport-limited fluorescent boundary measurements in frequency domain.
    Pan T; Rasmussen JC; Lee JH; Sevick-Muraca EM
    Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1298-311. PubMed ID: 17500461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gauss-Newton method for image reconstruction in diffuse optical tomography.
    Schweiger M; Arridge SR; Nissilä I
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 May; 50(10):2365-86. PubMed ID: 15876673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of reconstruction algorithms for optical diffraction tomography.
    Guo P; Devaney AJ
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2005 Nov; 22(11):2338-47. PubMed ID: 16302387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of light scattering models for diffuse optical tomography.
    González-Rodríguez P; Kim AD
    Opt Express; 2009 May; 17(11):8756-74. PubMed ID: 19466125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Polarimetric imaging of subsurface tissue-numerical results.
    Sudha GF; Palanivelu TG
    J Biomed Opt; 2005; 10(5):054014. PubMed ID: 16292974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determination of the optical properties of a two-layer tissue model by detecting photons migrating at progressively increasing depths.
    Fawzi YS; Youssef AB; el-Batanony MH; Kadah YM
    Appl Opt; 2003 Nov; 42(31):6398-411. PubMed ID: 14649284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving image quality of diffuse optical tomography with a projection-error-based adaptive regularization method.
    Niu H; Guo P; Ji L; Zhao Q; Jiang T
    Opt Express; 2008 Aug; 16(17):12423-34. PubMed ID: 18711479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Half-scan and single-plane intensity diffraction tomography for phase objects.
    Shi D; Anastasio MA; Huang Y; Gbur G
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jun; 49(12):2733-52. PubMed ID: 15272685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.