BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1544786)

  • 1. Factors influencing normal perimetric thresholds obtained using the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Herse PR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1992 Mar; 33(3):611-7. PubMed ID: 1544786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Depth-of-focus of the human eye in the near retinal periphery.
    Wang B; Ciuffreda KJ
    Vision Res; 2004 May; 44(11):1115-25. PubMed ID: 15050815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Equiblur zones at the fovea and near retinal periphery.
    Wang B; Ciuffreda KJ; Irish T
    Vision Res; 2006 Oct; 46(21):3690-8. PubMed ID: 16750552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fine matrix mapping of the macular region in normal subjects.
    Wu D; Bird AC; Mcnaught A; Buckland MS; Fitzke FW
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1995 Jul; 31(4):243-9. PubMed ID: 8745513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Light perception and flicker perimetry. Effect of refractive error, artificial media opacities and pupillary size].
    Gleissner M; Lachenmayr BJ
    Ophthalmologe; 1992 Apr; 89(2):162-5. PubMed ID: 1600326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adaptation mechanisms, eccentricity profiles, and clinical implementation of red-on-white perimetry.
    Zele AJ; Dang TM; O'Loughlin RK; Guymer RH; Harper A; Vingrys AJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 May; 85(5):309-17. PubMed ID: 18451735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of pupil perimetry and visual perimetry in normal eyes: decibel sensitivity and variability.
    Hong S; Narkiewicz J; Kardon RH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Apr; 42(5):957-65. PubMed ID: 11274072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contrasting blue-on-yellow with white-on-white visual fields: Roles of visual adaptation for healthy peri- or postmenopausal women younger than 70 years of age.
    Eisner A; Toomey MD; Incognito LJ; O'malley JP; Samples JR
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Dec; 47(12):5605-14. PubMed ID: 17122155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of threshold visual perimetry and objective pupil perimetry in clinical patients.
    Yoshitomi T; Matsui T; Tanakadate A; Ishikawa S
    J Neuroophthalmol; 1999 Jun; 19(2):89-99. PubMed ID: 10380129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Incremental light detection thresholds across the central visual field of human albinos.
    Abadi RV; Pascal E
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Apr; 34(5):1683-90. PubMed ID: 8473107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pupillary dilation and its effects on automated perimetry results.
    Kudrna GR; Stanley MA; Remington LA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Nov; 66(11):675-80. PubMed ID: 8576532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [A study on retinal light sensitivity of normal human visual fields].
    Yu MB; Zhou WB; Ye TC
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1994 Sep; 30(5):341-4. PubMed ID: 7805534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Blur discrimination of the human eye in the near retinal periphery.
    Wang B; Ciuffreda KJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2005 Jan; 82(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 15630404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Selective broad-band spatial frequency loss in contrast sensitivity functions. Comparison with a model based on optical transfer functions.
    Bour LJ; Apkarian P
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Nov; 37(12):2475-84. PubMed ID: 8933764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Reduction of retinal light sensitivity in diabetic patients].
    Pahor D
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2003 Dec; 220(12):868-72. PubMed ID: 14704945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationship between foveal threshold and visual acuity using the Humphrey visual field analyzer.
    Flaxel CJ; Samples JR; Dustin L
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2007 May; 143(5):875-7. PubMed ID: 17452176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Magnification perimetry.
    Latham K; Whitaker D; Wild JM; Elliott DB
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Apr; 34(5):1691-701. PubMed ID: 8473108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Regional variations in binocular summation across the visual field.
    Wood JM; Collins MJ; Carkeet A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1992 Jan; 12(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 1584616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing threshold visual fields between the Dicon TKS 4000 automated perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.
    Wong AY; Dodge RM; Remington LA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 Nov; 66(11):706-11. PubMed ID: 8576536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Factors affecting the normal perimetric profile derived by automated static threshold LED perimetry. I. Pupil size.
    Wood JM; Wild JM; Bullimore MA; Gilmartin B
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1988; 8(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 2971152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.