184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15447961)
1. Threshold contrast detail detectability curves for fluoroscopy and digital acquisition using modern image intensifier systems.
Evans DS; Mackenzie A; Lawinski CP; Smith D
Br J Radiol; 2004 Sep; 77(921):751-8. PubMed ID: 15447961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of a quality index in threshold contrast detail detection measurements in television fluoroscopy.
Gallacher DJ; Mackenzie A; Batchelor S; Lynch J; Saunders JE
Br J Radiol; 2003 Jul; 76(907):464-72. PubMed ID: 12857706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A figure of merit for the assessment of image intensifier systems.
McRobbie DW; Hancock AP; Castellano IA
Br J Radiol; 1992 Oct; 65(778):878-84. PubMed ID: 1422661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Threshold contrast detail detectability measurement of the fluoroscopic image quality of a dynamic solid-state digital x-ray image detector.
Davies AG; Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Bury RF; Bruijns TJ
Med Phys; 2001 Jan; 28(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 11213916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Update on the recommended viewing protocol for FAXIL threshold contrast detail detectability test objects used in television fluoroscopy.
Launders JH; McArdle S; Workman A; Cowen AR
Br J Radiol; 1995 Jan; 68(805):70-7. PubMed ID: 7881886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance assessment of X-ray image intensified television fluoroscopy systems in New Zealand.
Poletti JL; Le Heron JC
Br J Radiol; 1988 May; 61(725):393-400. PubMed ID: 3382870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Optimisation of dose per image in digital imaging.
Marshall NW
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):83-7. PubMed ID: 11487849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An alternative approach to contrast-detail testing of X-ray image intensifier systems.
Kotre CJ; Marshall NW; Faulkner K
Br J Radiol; 1992 Aug; 65(776):686-90. PubMed ID: 1393395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A set of X-ray test objects for image quality control in digital subtraction fluorography. I: Design considerations.
Cowen AR; Haywood JM; Workman A; Clarke OF
Br J Radiol; 1987 Oct; 60(718):1001-9. PubMed ID: 3315090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The design and imaging characteristics of dynamic, solid-state, flat-panel x-ray image detectors for digital fluoroscopy and fluorography.
Cowen AR; Davies AG; Sivananthan MU
Clin Radiol; 2008 Oct; 63(10):1073-85. PubMed ID: 18774353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Subjective and objective measures of image quality in digital fluoroscopy.
Walsh C; Dowling A; Meade A; Malone J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):34-7. PubMed ID: 16461534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quality control phantom for flat panel detector X-ray systems.
Chida K; Kaga Y; Haga Y; Takeda K; Zuguchi M
Health Phys; 2013 Jan; 104(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 23192093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Extended detail contrasts for TO.10 use on flat panel detector fluoroscopy systems.
McCarthy D; Kenny P
Br J Radiol; 2021 Jun; 94(1122):20201422. PubMed ID: 33956486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part II. NPWE as a validated alternative for contrast detail analysis.
Monnin P; Marshall NW; Bosmans H; Bochud FO; Verdun FR
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul; 56(14):4221-38. PubMed ID: 21701050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic flat panel detector versus image intensifier in cardiac imaging: dose and image quality.
Vano E; Geiger B; Schreiner A; Back C; Beissel J
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(23):5731-42. PubMed ID: 16306664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of performance of a new digital image intensifier fluoroscopy system.
Dimov A; Vassileva J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):123-6. PubMed ID: 18469348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: X-ray image intensifiers for fluoroscopy.
Wang J; Blackburn TJ
Radiographics; 2000; 20(5):1471-7. PubMed ID: 10992034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A novel quantitative measure of image quality in fluoroscopy.
Kenny P; Costello D; McCarthy D; Kenny E
Phys Med; 2020 Mar; 71():150-160. PubMed ID: 32146285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative evaluation of an II based and a flat panel based cardiovascular fluoroscopy system within a clinical environment.
Grewal RK; McLean ID
Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 2005 Sep; 28(3):151-8. PubMed ID: 16250468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
