These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15447961)

  • 21. Theoretical and experimental studies of the influence of air kerma rate on threshold contrast in diagnostic fluoroscopy systems.
    Harrison RM; Day MJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1983 Nov; 28(11):1319-31. PubMed ID: 6657744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Do flat detector cardiac X-ray systems convey advantages over image-intensifier-based systems? Study comparing X-ray dose and image quality.
    Davies AG; Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Moore J; Sivananthan MU
    Eur Radiol; 2007 Jul; 17(7):1787-94. PubMed ID: 17115166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A technique for very high accuracy image intensifier calibration.
    Viant WJ; Phillips R; Bielby MS; Zhu Y; Griffiths JG; Mohsen AM; Sherman KP
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1999; 62():379-80. PubMed ID: 10538391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Dose performance evaluation of a charge coupled device and a flat-panel digital fluoroscopy system recently installed in an interventional cardiology laboratory.
    Tsapaki V; Kottou S; Kollaros N; Dafnomili P; Kyriakidis Z; Neofotistou V
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 15266080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparative performance evaluation of a flat detector and an image intensifier angiographic system both used for interventional cardiology procedures in adult and pediatric patients.
    Kordolaimi SD; Salvara AL; Antonakos I; Tsalafoutas IA; Broutzos E; Efstathopoulos EP
    Phys Med; 2013 Mar; 29(2):178-87. PubMed ID: 22398332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Absorbed dose and image quality in examinations of the colon with digital and analogue techniques.
    Persliden J; Larsson P; Norén B; Wirell S
    Acta Radiol; 1997 Nov; 38(6):1010-4. PubMed ID: 9394659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The operation logic of automatic dose control of fluoroscopy system in conjunction with spectral shaping filters.
    Lin PJ
    Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3169-72. PubMed ID: 17879779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Quality control measurements for digital x-ray detectors.
    Marshall NW; Mackenzie A; Honey ID
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Feb; 56(4):979-99. PubMed ID: 21248386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: physics of flat-panel fluoroscopy systems: Survey of modern fluoroscopy imaging: flat-panel detectors versus image intensifiers and more.
    Nickoloff EL
    Radiographics; 2011; 31(2):591-602. PubMed ID: 21415199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A set of X-ray test objects for image quality control in digital subtraction fluorography. II: Application and interpretation of results.
    Cowen AR; Workman A; Haywood JM; Clarke OF
    Br J Radiol; 1987 Oct; 60(718):1011-8. PubMed ID: 3315091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Use of a simple Leeds test object for rapid assessment of image intensifiers.
    Grant AM; Kehoe TM; Law J
    Br J Radiol; 1987 Oct; 60(718):1019-21. PubMed ID: 3676644
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Analysis of frequency-contrast characteristics of digital X-ray image detectors].
    Zelikman MI; Kabanov SP; Kokuev AN; Kruchinin SA; Lobov DP
    Med Tekh; 2006; (5):23-7. PubMed ID: 17133940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Fluoroscopic image quality in the film and filmless eras: a standardized comparison performed in coronary interventional facilities.
    Laskey W; Wondrow M; Chambers C
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2003 Mar; 58(3):383-90. PubMed ID: 12594708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Image quality evaluation of flat panel and image intensifier digital magnification in x-ray fluoroscopy.
    Srinivas Y; Wilson DL
    Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1611-21. PubMed ID: 12148744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Image quality assessment in digital mammography: part I. Technical characterization of the systems.
    Marshall NW; Monnin P; Bosmans H; Bochud FO; Verdun FR
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Jul; 56(14):4201-20. PubMed ID: 21701051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Optimization of variable temporal averaging in digital fluoroscopy.
    Kotre CJ; Guibelalde E
    Br J Radiol; 2004 Aug; 77(920):675-8. PubMed ID: 15326047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Quality control measurements for fluoroscopy systems in eight countries participating in the SENTINEL EU coordination action.
    Zoetelief J; Schultz FW; Kottou S; Gray L; O'Connor U; Salat D; Kepler K; Kaplanis P; Jankowski J; Schreiner A; Vassileva J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):237-43. PubMed ID: 18310607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An added quality-control measurement for fluoroscopic x-ray systems.
    Miller KL; Stoltzfus WR; Latshaw RF
    Radiology; 1981 Aug; 140(2):518-9. PubMed ID: 7255732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [A urological x-ray study table with a 36-cm x-ray image intensifier].
    Melchior H; Lang G
    Urologe A; 1983 Jan; 22(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 6220504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.