These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15447961)

  • 41. Does digital flat detector technology tip the scale towards better image quality or reduced patient dose in interventional cardiology?
    Bogaert E; Bacher K; Lapere R; Thierens H
    Eur J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 72(2):348-53. PubMed ID: 18789622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Soft-copy quality control of digital spot images obtained by using X-ray image intensifiers.
    Peter MB; Pavlicek W; Owen JM
    Radiology; 2000 Sep; 216(3):810-9. PubMed ID: 10966716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: fluoroscopy: optical coupling and the video system.
    Van Lysel MS
    Radiographics; 2000; 20(6):1769-86. PubMed ID: 11112828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Practical application of suspension criteria scenarios in general radiography, computed radiography,digital radiography and fluoroscopy.
    O'Connor U; Gallagher A; O'Reilly G; Dowling A; Malone JF
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Feb; 153(2):236-40. PubMed ID: 23169811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Digital fluorograph with automatic exposition].
    Mishkinis AB; Kanter BM
    Med Tekh; 2004; (5):42. PubMed ID: 15568514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A review of image quality and dose issues in digital fluorography and digital subtraction angiography.
    Kotre CJ; Marshall NW
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):73-6. PubMed ID: 11487847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Operation logic and functionality of automatic dose rate and image quality control of conventional fluoroscopy.
    Lin PJ
    Med Phys; 2009 May; 36(5):1486-93. PubMed ID: 19544764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Initial technical and clinical evaluation of a new universal image receptor system.
    Bury RF; Cowen AR; Davies AG; Hawkridge P; Bruijns AJ; von Reth E
    Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(12):1983-7. PubMed ID: 11305582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. An analysis of dose efficiency in image intensified fluoroscopic examinations.
    Bernstein H; Muntz EP
    Med Phys; 1981; 8(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 7322044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Image magnification in digital fluoroscopy.
    Rosenstein DS
    Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 1998; 39(4):304-8. PubMed ID: 9710131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A Rotatable Quality Control Phantom for Evaluating the Performance of Flat Panel Detectors in Imaging Moving Objects.
    Haga Y; Chida K; Inaba Y; Kaga Y; Meguro T; Zuguchi M
    J Digit Imaging; 2016 Feb; 29(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 26264731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: general overview of fluoroscopic imaging.
    Schueler BA
    Radiographics; 2000; 20(4):1115-26. PubMed ID: 10903700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Reduction of the radiation exposure in photofluorography by using rare earth-based fluorescent screens].
    Schöfer H; Eder H
    Rofo; 1984 Aug; 141(2):223-6. PubMed ID: 6431550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A physical assessment of the imaging performance of panel-type X-ray image intensifier.
    Hay GA; Cowen AR
    Br J Radiol; 1981 Jan; 54(637):24-8. PubMed ID: 7448496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Logarithmic amplifier for computed tomography tasks using fluoroscopic projections.
    Buliev I; Badea C; Pallikarakis N
    J Med Eng Technol; 2002; 26(6):247-52. PubMed ID: 12490030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Performance evaluation and testing of digital intra-oral radiographic systems.
    Doyle P; Finney L
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):313-7. PubMed ID: 16461488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Evaluation of radiographic image quality parameters obtained with the REX simulator.
    Magalhaes LA; Drexler GG; deAlmeida CE
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(4):614-8. PubMed ID: 21273198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effects of radiographic techniques on the low-contrast detail detectability performance of digital radiography systems.
    Alsleem H; U P; Mong KS; Davidson R
    Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(6):614-22. PubMed ID: 25002641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. [Methods and devices for low-dose digital fluorography].
    Kanter BM
    Med Tekh; 1999; (5):10-3. PubMed ID: 10560088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Impact of the X-ray system setting on patient dose and image quality; a case study with two interventional cardiology systems.
    Vassileva J; Vano E; Ubeda C; Rehani M; Zotova R
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Jul; 155(3):329-34. PubMed ID: 23396881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.