These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15447961)

  • 61. [Relationship of the specifications and informative value of digital X-ray study in pulmonary tuberculosis].
    Sadikov PV
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2007; (2):4-9. PubMed ID: 18383617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. The image intensifier in oral and maxillofacial surgery.
    Gans BJ; Kallal RH; Helgerson AC; Verona SR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1982 Nov; 40(11):726-9. PubMed ID: 6957560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Technical advances of interventional fluoroscopy and flat panel image receptor.
    Lin PJ
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):650-7. PubMed ID: 18849699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Image quality of an image-intensifier fluorographic system.
    Wolf M; Steinbach W; Angerstein W
    Phys Med Biol; 1984 May; 29(5):567-77. PubMed ID: 6739542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Assessment of fluoroscopic systems with a simple test object.
    Ricciardello M; McLean D
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1995 Jun; 18(2):104-13. PubMed ID: 7669021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. [The economic expediency of digital fluorography].
    Blinov NN; Gubenko MB; Utkin PM
    Med Tekh; 1999; (5):41-4. PubMed ID: 10560099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. The application of image quality measurements for digital angiography.
    Peterzol A; Padovani R; Quai E; Vano E; Prieto C; Aviles P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):38-43. PubMed ID: 16461533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Review of acceptability criteria for X ray systems relevant for digital radiology.
    Zoetelief J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):59-64. PubMed ID: 11487844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. ASSESSING THE USEFULNESS OF THE QUASI-IDEAL OBSERVER FOR QUALITY CONTROL IN FLUOROSCOPY.
    Tesselaar E; Sandborg M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):360-4. PubMed ID: 26493947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Feasibility of a large area x-ray sensitive vidicon for medical fluoroscopy: signal and noise factors.
    Luhta R; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 1997 May; 24(5):609-20. PubMed ID: 9167153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. A computer model of an image intensifier system working under automatic brightness control.
    Reilly AJ; Sutton DG
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Oct; 74(886):938-48. PubMed ID: 11675312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Clinical aspects of quality criteria in digital radiography.
    Vetter S; Strecker EP
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):33-6. PubMed ID: 11487839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. [Digital fluorography in gastroenterological radiology].
    Bellomi M; Severini A; Cozzi G; Zonca G; Brusa A; Colnago L; Salvetti M; Colnago MF
    Radiol Med; 1994 Apr; 87(4):460-8. PubMed ID: 8190930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Influence of image metrics when assessing image quality from a test object in cardiac X-ray systems.
    Vano E; Ubeda C; Geiger B; Martinez LC; Balter S
    J Digit Imaging; 2011 Apr; 24(2):331-8. PubMed ID: 20127268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. The practical application of signal detection theory to image quality assessment in x-ray image intensifier-TV fluoroscopy.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Jun; 46(6):1631-49. PubMed ID: 11419624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Quality control in diagnostic radiology--a United States perspective.
    Thiele DL
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1996 Jun; 19(2):97-105. PubMed ID: 8826715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Digital fluoroscopic radiology: evaluation of the clinical impact.
    Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Georgi M
    Eur J Radiol; 1993 Jun; 17(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 8348910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Validation of correction methods for the non-linear response of digital radiography systems.
    Mackenzie A
    Br J Radiol; 2008 Apr; 81(964):341-5. PubMed ID: 18344278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. A set of X-ray test objects for quality control in television fluoroscopy.
    Hay GA; Clarke OF; Coleman NJ; Cowen AR
    Br J Radiol; 1985 Apr; 58(688):335-44. PubMed ID: 4063676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Introduction to constancy check protocols in fluoroscopic systems.
    Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):65-8. PubMed ID: 11487845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.