These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15447961)

  • 81. A critical overview of acceptance testing using various measured indices.
    Dowling A; Kenny T; Malone J
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 94(1-2):53-8. PubMed ID: 11487843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Characterization of aberrations in image-intensified fluoroscopy.
    Casperson LW; Spiegler P; Grollman JH
    Med Phys; 1976; 3(2):103-6. PubMed ID: 1264038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Digital videofluorography for direct digital spot filming of gastrointestinal studies.
    Steiner E; Mueller PR; Hahn PF; Taaffe J; Ferrucci JT
    Gastrointest Radiol; 1989; 14(3):193-201. PubMed ID: 2731689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. [Image display devices (4) - the standard of display quality].
    Hashimoto N
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Feb; 59(2):255-62. PubMed ID: 12668953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. [X-ray intensifier with improved picture quality].
    Hofmann FW
    Rontgenblatter; 1972 May; 25(5):198-205. PubMed ID: 4670976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Quality assurance programme applied to mobile C-arm fluoroscopy systems.
    Tuohy B; Marsh DM; O'Reilly G; Dowling A; Cooney P; Malone JF
    Eur Radiol; 1997; 7(4):534-41. PubMed ID: 9204335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. [Examination of the image quality from digital fluoroscopy equipment with 1k- and 2k-image matrix].
    Kunz G; Busch HP
    Rofo; 2000 Aug; 172(8):707-13. PubMed ID: 11013613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Comparison of image intensifier photofluorography and full-size radiography in abdominal angiography.
    Aakhus T; Lantto L; Kolmannskog F; Winter A
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1981; 22(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 7257851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Short communication: use of the output video signal for dynamic range, brightness control and image memory assessment in X-ray fluoroscopy.
    Okkalides D
    Br J Radiol; 1996 Sep; 69(825):855-9. PubMed ID: 8983591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. On the relationship of image intensifier contrast ratios measured by two techniques.
    Nalcioglu O; Roeck WW; Lando AV; Seibert JA
    Phys Med Biol; 1984 Oct; 29(10):1231-6. PubMed ID: 6494249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. Feasibility of a large area x-ray sensitive vidicon for medical fluoroscopy: resolution and lag factors.
    Luhta R; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 1997 May; 24(5):621-31. PubMed ID: 9167154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Uses of image intensification in podiatric surgery.
    Haber JA; Trepal M
    J Foot Surg; 1983; 22(4):335-8. PubMed ID: 6643944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Noise and threshold contrast characteristics of a digital fluorographic system.
    Harrison RM; Kotre CJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1986 May; 31(5):515-26. PubMed ID: 3737686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Removal of image intensifier veiling glare by mathematical deconvolution techniques.
    Seibert JA; Nalcioglu O; Roeck W
    Med Phys; 1985; 12(3):281-8. PubMed ID: 4010632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Development of a quality assurance protocol for peripheral subtraction imaging applications.
    Walsh C; Murphy D; O'Hare N
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Apr; 47(8):N91-7. PubMed ID: 12030566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Cardiac catheterization laboratory imaging quality assurance program.
    Wondrow MA; Laskey WK; Hildner FJ; Cusma J; Holmes DR
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2001 Jan; 52(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 11146525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. An audit of the safe use of the mini c-arm image intensifier in the out-patient setting.
    Hasham S; Burke FD; Evans SJ; Arundell MK; Quinton DN
    J Hand Surg Eur Vol; 2007 Oct; 32(5):563-8. PubMed ID: 17950224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Quantum noise in X-ray image intensifiers.
    Porubszky T
    J Biomed Eng; 1987 Jul; 9(3):261-6. PubMed ID: 3613550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Threshold-contrast detectability curves for digital acquisition.
    Kotre CJ; Marshall NW
    Br J Radiol; 2005 May; 78(929):469-70; author reply 470. PubMed ID: 15845946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. A comparison of analogue and digital techniques in upper gastrointestinal examinations: absorbed dose and diagnostic quality of the images.
    Axelsson B; Bodén K; Fransson SG; Hansson IB; Persliden J; Witt HH
    Eur Radiol; 2000; 10(8):1351-4. PubMed ID: 10939506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.