These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

355 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15450438)

  • 1. Effects of noise and filtering on the intelligibility of speech produced during simultaneous communication.
    MacKenzie DJ; Schiavetti N; Whitehead RL; Metz DE
    J Commun Disord; 2004; 37(6):505-15. PubMed ID: 15450438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intelligibility of speech produced during simultaneous communication.
    Whitehead RL; Schiavetti N; MacKenzie DJ; Metz DE
    J Commun Disord; 2004; 37(3):241-53. PubMed ID: 15063145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perception of the voicing distinction in speech produced during simultaneous communication.
    MacKenzie DJ; Schiavetti N; Whitehead RL; Metz DE
    J Commun Disord; 2006; 39(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 15978608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Acoustic and perceptual characteristics of vowels produced during simultaneous communication.
    Schiavetti N; Metz DE; Whitehead RL; Brown S; Borges J; Rivera S; Schultz C
    J Commun Disord; 2004; 37(3):275-94. PubMed ID: 15063147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acoustic-phonetic characteristics of speech produced with communicative intent to counter adverse listening conditions.
    Hazan V; Baker R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2139-52. PubMed ID: 21973368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of syllable-initial voicing on vowel duration during simultaneous communication.
    Metz DE; Allen K; Kling T; Maisonet S; McCullough R; Schiavetti N; Whitehead RL
    J Commun Disord; 2006; 39(3):192-9. PubMed ID: 16384578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Suprasegmental characteristics of speech produced during simultaneous communication by inexperienced signers.
    Whitehead RL; Metz DE; Girardi E; Irwin J; Krigsman A; Swanson C; MacKenzie D; Schiavetti N
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2009; 14(3):362-70. PubMed ID: 19056859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pupil response as an indication of effortful listening: the influence of sentence intelligibility.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):480-90. PubMed ID: 20588118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development and evaluation of the listening in spatialized noise test.
    Cameron S; Dillon H; Newall P
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):30-42. PubMed ID: 16446563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cognitive load during speech perception in noise: the influence of age, hearing loss, and cognition on the pupil response.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Festen JM
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(4):498-510. PubMed ID: 21233711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The combined effects of reverberation and nonstationary noise on sentence intelligibility.
    George EL; Festen JM; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1269-77. PubMed ID: 18681613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
    Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preservation of second formant transitions during simultaneous communication: a locus equation perspective.
    Baillargeon M; McLeod A; Metz DE; Schiavetti N; Whitehead RL
    J Commun Disord; 2002; 35(1):51-62. PubMed ID: 11949972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Spanish matrix sentence test for assessing speech reception thresholds in noise.
    Hochmuth S; Brand T; Zokoll MA; Castro FZ; Wardenga N; Kollmeier B
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Jul; 51(7):536-44. PubMed ID: 22537033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Talker-listener accent interactions in speech-in-noise recognition: effects of prosodic manipulation as a function of language experience.
    Pinet M; Iverson P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1357-65. PubMed ID: 20815470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Danish hearing in noise test.
    Nielsen JB; Dau T
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Mar; 50(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 21319937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Callsign Acquisition Test (CAT): speech intelligibility in noise.
    Rao MD; Letowski T
    Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):120-8. PubMed ID: 16518140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Audibility of American English vowels produced by English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native speakers in long-term speech-shaped noise.
    Liu C; Jin SH
    Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):49-55. PubMed ID: 21920420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 2: improving test sensitivity for noise-induced hearing loss.
    Leensen MC; de Laat JA; Snik AF; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):835-48. PubMed ID: 21970351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.