These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1545045)

  • 21. Early hardness of self-adhesive resin cements cured under indirect resin composite restorations.
    Giráldez I; Ceballos L; Garrido MA; Rodríguez J
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2011 Apr; 23(2):116-24. PubMed ID: 21477039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In vivo evaluation of the wear of restorative resin.
    Mitchem JC; Gronas DG
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1982 Mar; 104(3):333-5. PubMed ID: 6949979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of the fracture resistance of reattached incisal fragments using different materials and techniques.
    Chazine M; Sedda M; Ounsi HF; Paragliola R; Ferrari M; Grandini S
    Dent Traumatol; 2011 Feb; 27(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 21244624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Composite resin restorations: "in vitro" evaluation of three dentin adhesive systems].
    Toca E; Bonfil JJ; Pignoly C
    Inf Dent; 1991 Jun; 73(23):1865-73. PubMed ID: 1830292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Time-dependent deformation of composite restorative materials in compression.
    Cock DJ; Watts DC
    J Dent Res; 1985 Feb; 64(2):147-50. PubMed ID: 3156163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A 5- and 8-year clinical evaluation of a posterior composite resin.
    Barnes DM; Blank LW; Thompson VP; Holston AM; Gingell JC
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Feb; 22(2):143-51. PubMed ID: 2068249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Microleakage of cervical restorations using two resin bonding systems.
    Owens BM; Kaplan I; Gilpatrick RO
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1995 Jan; 75(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 9520779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Direct resin-based composites: current recommendations for optimal clinical results.
    Ritter AV
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2005 Jul; 26(7):481-2, 484-90; quiz 492, 527. PubMed ID: 16060378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Direct composite resin restoration of adolescent Class IV tooth fracture: a case report.
    Terry DA
    Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent; 2000; 12(1):23-9; quiz 30. PubMed ID: 11404887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Composite resin-amalgam compound restorations.
    Franchi M; Trisi P; Montanari G; Piattelli A
    Quintessence Int; 1994 Aug; 25(8):577-82. PubMed ID: 7568708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [A histo-pathological and clinico-pathological study of pulp response to a microfilled resin restoration system using a bonding agent].
    Ikeda Y
    Shikwa Gakuho; 1985 Mar; 85(3):301-38. PubMed ID: 3860956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of three resin systems in the restoration of fractured young anterior teeth.
    Starkey PE; Phillips RW
    J Indiana Dent Assoc; 1984; 63(4):11-3. PubMed ID: 6236266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of finishing on the in vivo wear rate of a posterior composite resin.
    Ratanapridakul K; Leinfelder KF; Thomas J
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1989 Mar; 118(3):333-5. PubMed ID: 2921432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of a glass ionomer cement and a microfilled composite resin in the treatment of root surface caries.
    Levy SM; Jenson ME; Doering JV; Sheth JJ
    Gen Dent; 1989; 37(6):468-72. PubMed ID: 2534806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Microhardness and porosity of Class 2 light-cured composite restorations cured with a transparent cone attached to the light-curing wand.
    Von Beetzen M; Li J; Nicander I; Sundström F
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 8415161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Complete marginal seal of Class V resin composite restorations effected by increased flexibility.
    Kemp-Scholte CM; Davidson CL
    J Dent Res; 1990 Jun; 69(6):1240-3. PubMed ID: 2141338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Histopathological study of changes in tissues adjacent to the dental pulp during restoration with composite materials using traditional technics and using controlled polymerization with infrared 904 nm. laser light].
    Benedicenti A; Gherlone EF; Martino AR; Verrando M; Piccirillo M; De Angelis P; Rinaldi F
    Parodontol Stomatol (Nuova); 1984; 23(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 6242427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dentin bonding, caries control.
    Swift EJ
    J Esthet Dent; 2000; 12(5):236-7. PubMed ID: 11338489
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of two polishing pastes on the surface roughness of bis-acryl composite and methacrylate-based resins.
    Sen D; Göller G; Işsever H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):527-32. PubMed ID: 12474004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Class V lesions restored with flowable composite and added surface sealing resin.
    Estafan D; Dussetschleger FL; Miuo LE; Kondamani J
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(1):78-80. PubMed ID: 11199559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.