174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15451160)
1. Computer simulation on fatigue behavior of cemented hip prostheses: a physiological model.
Hung JP; Chen JH; Chiang HL; Wu JS
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2004 Nov; 76(2):103-13. PubMed ID: 15451160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. In vitro measurement of strain in the bone cement surrounding the femoral component of total hip replacements during simulated gait and stair-climbing.
O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Jasty M; Sedlacek RC; Harris WH
J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):769-77. PubMed ID: 8893771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of cement mantle thickness and stem geometry on fatigue damage in two different cemented hip femoral prostheses.
Ramos A; Simões JA
J Biomech; 2009 Nov; 42(15):2602-10. PubMed ID: 19660758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Reinforcement of bone cement around prostheses by pre-coated wire coil: a finite element model study.
Grosland N; Kim JK; Park JB
Biomed Mater Eng; 1995; 5(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 7773144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stable partial debonding of the cement interfaces indicated by a finite element model of a total hip prosthesis.
Lu Z; Ebramzadeh E; McKellop H; Sarmiento A
J Orthop Res; 1996 Mar; 14(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 8648501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparative FEA of the debonding process in different concepts of cemented hip implants.
Pérez MA; García-Aznar JM; Doblaré M; Seral B; Seral F
Med Eng Phys; 2006 Jul; 28(6):525-33. PubMed ID: 16257253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Can finite element models detect clinically inferior cemented hip implants?
Stolk J; Maher SA; Verdonschot N; Prendergast PJ; Huiskes R
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Apr; (409):138-50. PubMed ID: 12671496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cement mantle fatigue failure in total hip replacement: experimental and computational testing.
Jeffers JR; Browne M; Lennon AB; Prendergast PJ; Taylor M
J Biomech; 2007; 40(7):1525-33. PubMed ID: 17070816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Shape optimization of metal backing for cemented acetabular cup.
Hedia HS; Abdel-Shafi AA; Fouda N
Biomed Mater Eng; 2000; 10(2):73-82. PubMed ID: 11086841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of stem geometry on mechanics of cemented femoral hip components with a proximal bond.
Mann KA; Bartel DL; Ayers DC
J Orthop Res; 1997 Sep; 15(5):700-6. PubMed ID: 9420599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cement mantle stress under retroversion torque at heel-strike.
Afsharpoya B; Barton DC; Fisher J; Purbach B; Wroblewski M; Stewart TD
Med Eng Phys; 2009 Dec; 31(10):1323-30. PubMed ID: 19879794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computational assessment of the effect of polyethylene wear rate, mantle thickness, and porosity on the mechanical failure of the acetabular cement mantle.
Coultrup OJ; Hunt C; Wroblewski BM; Taylor M
J Orthop Res; 2010 May; 28(5):565-70. PubMed ID: 19950359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of stem geometry on stresses within the distal cement mantle in total hip replacement.
Schmölz W; Gordon DR; Shields AJ; Kirkwood D; Grigoris P
Technol Health Care; 2000; 8(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 10942992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of variation of prosthesis size on cement stress at the tip of a femoral implant.
Lee IY; Skinner HB; Keyak JH
J Biomed Mater Res; 1994 Sep; 28(9):1055-60. PubMed ID: 7814433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cortical and interfacial bone changes around a non-cemented hip implant: simulations using a combined strain/damage remodelling algorithm.
Scannell PT; Prendergast PJ
Med Eng Phys; 2009 May; 31(4):477-88. PubMed ID: 19188086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Probabilistic analysis of the influence of the bonding degree of the stem-cement interface in the performance of cemented hip prostheses.
Pérez MA; Grasa J; García-Aznar JM; Bea JA; Doblaré M
J Biomech; 2006; 39(10):1859-72. PubMed ID: 16054633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Mathematical simulation of stem/cement/bone mechanical interactions for Poldi-Cech, CF-30, MS-30 and PFC femoral components].
Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19439130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A fatigue damage model for the cement-bone interface.
Kim DG; Miller MA; Mann KA
J Biomech; 2004 Oct; 37(10):1505-12. PubMed ID: 15336925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Stiffness optimisation of cement and stem materials in total hip replacement.
Hedia HS
Biomed Mater Eng; 2001; 11(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 11281574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
