These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15451160)

  • 21. Partially cemented AncaDualFit hip stems do not fail in simulated active patients.
    Cristofolini L; Erani P; Teutonico AS; Traina F; Viceconti M; Toni A
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Feb; 22(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 17070631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fatigue crack growth rate does not depend on mantle thickness: an idealized cemented stem construct under torsional loading.
    Hertzler J; Miller MA; Mann KA
    J Orthop Res; 2002 Jul; 20(4):676-82. PubMed ID: 12168654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of variation of cement thickness on bone and cement stress at the tip of a femoral implant.
    Lee IY; Skinner HB; Keyak JH
    Iowa Orthop J; 1993; 13():155-9. PubMed ID: 7820736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of the effects of implant materials and designs on thermal necrosis of bone in cemented hip arthroplasty.
    Li C; Kotha S; Mason J
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2003; 13(4):419-28. PubMed ID: 14646056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The load carrying and fatigue properties of the stem-cement interface with smooth and porous coated femoral components.
    Manley MT; Stern LS; Gurtowski J
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1985; 19(5):563-75. PubMed ID: 4066729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A finite element study of the initiation of failure of fixation in cemented femoral total hip components.
    Harrigan TP; Kareh JA; O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Harris WH
    J Orthop Res; 1992 Jan; 10(1):134-44. PubMed ID: 1727933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Mechanical aspects of degree of cement bonding and implant wedge effect.
    Yoon YS; Oxland TR; Hodgson AJ; Duncan CP; Masri BA; Choi D
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Nov; 23(9):1141-7. PubMed ID: 18584929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Finite-element analysis of failure of the Capital Hip designs.
    Janssen D; Aquarius R; Stolk J; Verdonschot N
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2005 Nov; 87(11):1561-7. PubMed ID: 16260681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Finite element-based preclinical testing of cemented total hip implants.
    Stolk J; Janssen D; Huiskes R; Verdonschot N
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Mar; 456():138-47. PubMed ID: 17075379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Use of a genetic algorithm for multiobjective design optimization of the femoral stem of a cemented total hip arthroplasty.
    Ishida T; Nishimura I; Tanino H; Higa M; Ito H; Mitamura Y
    Artif Organs; 2011 Apr; 35(4):404-10. PubMed ID: 21332564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis responsible to bone cement with customized prosthesis of proximal segmental femur].
    Liu Y; Tu CQ; Li XB; Duan H; Pei FX
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2007 Mar; 38(2):324-7. PubMed ID: 17441361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Finite element analysis of a three-dimensional model of a proximal femur-cemented femoral THJR component construct: influence of assigned interface conditions on strain energy density.
    Lewis G; Duggineni R
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2006; 16(5):319-27. PubMed ID: 17075167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The European school of total hip arthroplasty and 35 years of total hip arthroplasty in the Czech Republic.
    Cech O; Dzupa V
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2005; 72(1):57-76. PubMed ID: 15860155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The influence of proximal stem geometry and surface finish on the fixation of a double-tapered cemented femoral stem.
    Sangiorgio SN; Longjohn DB; Dorr LD; Ebramzadeh E
    J Biomech; 2011 Jan; 44(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 20828697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Feb; 74(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 17331456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Comparative finite element analysis of the debonding process in different concepts of cemented hip implants.
    Pérez MA; Palacios J
    Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 Jun; 38(6):2093-106. PubMed ID: 20232148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bone remodelling inside a cemented resurfaced femoral head.
    Gupta S; New AM; Taylor M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jul; 21(6):594-602. PubMed ID: 16542761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. In vitro cyclic testing of the Exeter stem after cement within cement revision.
    Wilson LJ; Bell CG; Weinrauch P; Crawford R
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):789-94. PubMed ID: 18534400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of three-dimensional shape optimization on the probabilistic response of a cemented femoral hip prosthesis.
    Nicolella DP; Thacker BH; Katoozian H; Davy DT
    J Biomech; 2006; 39(7):1265-78. PubMed ID: 15961093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Increased long-term failure risk associated with excessively thin cement mantle in cemented hip arthroplasty: a comparative in vitro study.
    Cristofolini L; Erani P; Savigni P; Grupp T; Thies O; Viceconti M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 May; 22(4):410-21. PubMed ID: 17275149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.