372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15451835)
1. Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Chan AW; Krleza-Jerić K; Schmid I; Altman DG
CMAJ; 2004 Sep; 171(7):735-40. PubMed ID: 15451835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Empirical evidence for selective reporting of outcomes in randomized trials: comparison of protocols to published articles.
Chan AW; Hróbjartsson A; Haahr MT; Gøtzsche PC; Altman DG
JAMA; 2004 May; 291(20):2457-65. PubMed ID: 15161896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Selective reporting of positive outcomes in randomised trials--secondary publication.. A comparison of protocols with published reports].
Hróbjartsson A; Chan AW; Haahr MT; Gøtzsche PC; Altman DG
Ugeskr Laeger; 2005 Aug; 167(34):3189-91. PubMed ID: 16117920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Association between industry funding and statistically significant pro-industry findings in medical and surgical randomized trials.
Bhandari M; Busse JW; Jackowski D; Montori VM; Schünemann H; Sprague S; Mears D; Schemitsch EH; Heels-Ansdell D; Devereaux PJ
CMAJ; 2004 Feb; 170(4):477-80. PubMed ID: 14970094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Publication bias in the anesthesiology literature.
De Oliveira GS; Chang R; Kendall MC; Fitzgerald PC; McCarthy RJ
Anesth Analg; 2012 May; 114(5):1042-8. PubMed ID: 22344237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcome reporting in industry-sponsored trials of gabapentin for off-label use.
Vedula SS; Bero L; Scherer RW; Dickersin K
N Engl J Med; 2009 Nov; 361(20):1963-71. PubMed ID: 19907043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcome reporting bias in government-funded RCTs.
Moja PL; Moschetti I; D'Amico R
CMAJ; 2005 Mar; 172(7):857; author reply 857. PubMed ID: 15795393
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized clinical trials of surgical interventions.
Hannink G; Gooszen HG; Rovers MM
Ann Surg; 2013 May; 257(5):818-23. PubMed ID: 23407296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Empirical evidence for outcome reporting bias in randomized clinical trials of acupuncture: comparison of registered records and subsequent publications.
Su CX; Han M; Ren J; Li WY; Yue SJ; Hao YF; Liu JP
Trials; 2015 Jan; 16():28. PubMed ID: 25626862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Registering CIHR-funded randomized controlled trials: a global public good.
Moher D; Bernstein A
CMAJ; 2004 Sep; 171(7):750-1. PubMed ID: 15451838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Differential citation rates of major cardiovascular clinical trials according to source of funding: a survey from 2000 to 2005.
Conen D; Torres J; Ridker PM
Circulation; 2008 Sep; 118(13):1321-7. PubMed ID: 18779441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Registration rates, adequacy of registration, and a comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials published in surgery journals.
Killeen S; Sourallous P; Hunter IA; Hartley JE; Grady HL
Ann Surg; 2014 Jan; 259(1):193-6. PubMed ID: 23732270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of noninferiority margins reported in protocols and publications showed incomplete and inconsistent reporting.
Dekkers OM; Cevallos M; Bührer J; Poncet A; Ackermann Rau S; Perneger TV; Egger M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 May; 68(5):510-7. PubMed ID: 25450451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors.
Chan AW; Altman DG
BMJ; 2005 Apr; 330(7494):753. PubMed ID: 15681569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of document type on reporting quality of clinical drug trials: a comparison of registry reports, clinical study reports, and journal publications.
Wieseler B; Kerekes MF; Vervoelgyi V; McGauran N; Kaiser T
BMJ; 2012 Jan; 344():d8141. PubMed ID: 22214759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retrospective cohort study highlighted outcome reporting bias in UK publicly funded trials.
Matthews GA; Dumville JC; Hewitt CE; Torgerson DJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Dec; 64(12):1317-24. PubMed ID: 21889307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Association of industry sponsorship to published outcomes in gastrointestinal clinical research.
Brown A; Kraft D; Schmitz SM; Sharpless V; Martin C; Shah R; Shaheen NJ
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2006 Dec; 4(12):1445-51. PubMed ID: 17101295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Systematic evaluation of the quality of randomized controlled trials in diabetes.
Montori VM; Wang YG; Alonso-Coello P; Bhagra S
Diabetes Care; 2006 Aug; 29(8):1833-8. PubMed ID: 16873788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. NIH clinical trials and publication bias.
Dickersin K; Min YI
Online J Curr Clin Trials; 1993 Apr; Doc No 50():[4967 words; 53 paragraphs]. PubMed ID: 8306005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcome reporting bias in evaluations of public health interventions: evidence of impact and the potential role of a study register.
Pearson M; Peters J
J Epidemiol Community Health; 2012 Apr; 66(4):286-9. PubMed ID: 21652522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
