These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15451852)

  • 1. Linguistic diversity in deaf defendants and due process rights.
    Miller KR; Vernon M
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2001; 6(3):226-34. PubMed ID: 15451852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. AAPL Practice Guideline for the forensic psychiatric evaluation of competence to stand trial.
    Mossman D; Noffsinger SG; Ash P; Frierson RL; Gerbasi J; Hackett M; Lewis CF; Pinals DA; Scott CL; Sieg KG; Wall BW; Zonana HV;
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(4 Suppl):S3-72. PubMed ID: 18083992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adjudicative competence: evidence that impairment in "rational understanding" is taxonic.
    Marcus DK; Poythress NG; Edens JF; Lilienfeld SO
    Psychol Assess; 2010 Sep; 22(3):716-22. PubMed ID: 20822285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Competence to stand trial: clinician reliability and the role of offense severity.
    Rosenfeld B; Ritchie K
    J Forensic Sci; 1998 Jan; 43(1):151-7. PubMed ID: 9456535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Competence to proceed: a functional and context-determinative decision.
    Bennett GT; Sullwold AF
    J Forensic Sci; 1984 Oct; 29(4):1119-26. PubMed ID: 6502111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Adjudicative Competence in the Context of a Defendant's Absence from Trial after a Suicide Attempt.
    Williams JB
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2023 Dec; 51(4):558-565. PubMed ID: 38065620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Constitutional protection of confessions made by mentally retarded defendants.
    Praiss DM
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 14(4):431-65. PubMed ID: 2729294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Opinion formation in evaluating the adjudicative competence and restorability of criminal defendants: a review of 8,000 evaluations.
    Warren JI; Murrie DC; Stejskal W; Colwell LH; Morris J; Chauhan P; Dietz P
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(2):113-32. PubMed ID: 16557643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Linguistic diversity in a deaf prison population: implications for due process.
    Miller KR
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2004; 9(1):112-9. PubMed ID: 15304406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A confusion of tongues: competence, insanity, psychiatry, and the law.
    Gutheil TG
    Psychiatr Serv; 1999 Jun; 50(6):767-73. PubMed ID: 10375145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Proposed Model for Assessing Defendant Competence to Self-Represent.
    White MM; Gutheil TG
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2016 Dec; 44(4):425-436. PubMed ID: 28003386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The MacArthur Adjudicative Competence Study: a comparison of criteria for assessing the competence of criminal defendants.
    Bonnie RJ; Hoge SK; Monahan J; Poythress N; Eisenberg M; Feucht-Haviar T
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(3):249-59. PubMed ID: 9323652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The civil liability for damages of the criminally insane.
    Melamed Y; Ganot N; Mester R; Bleich A
    Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 2008; 45(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 19439834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do defense attorney referrals for competence to stand trial evaluations depend on whether the client speaks English or Spanish?
    Varela JG; Boccaccini MT; Gonzalez E; Gharagozloo L; Johnson SM
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Dec; 35(6):501-11. PubMed ID: 21104305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rock v. Arkansas: hypnosis, the defendant's privilege.
    Orne MT; Dinges DF; Orne EC
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1990 Oct; 38(4):250-65. PubMed ID: 2258243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Indiana v. Davis: revisiting due process rights of permanently incompetent defendants.
    Morris DR; Parker GF
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(3):380-5. PubMed ID: 19767504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting restorability of incompetent criminal defendants.
    Mossman D
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 17389343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. "A fool for a client": print portrayals of 49 pro se criminal defendants.
    Mossman D; Dunseith NW
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2001; 29(4):408-19. PubMed ID: 11785612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantifying the accuracy of forensic examiners in the absence of a "gold standard".
    Mossman D; Bowen MD; Vanness DJ; Bienenfeld D; Correll T; Kay J; Klykylo WM; Lehrer DS
    Law Hum Behav; 2010 Oct; 34(5):402-17. PubMed ID: 19771499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Competence to waive interrogation rights and adjudicative competence in adolescent defendants: cognitive development, attorney contact, and psychological symptoms.
    Viljoen JL; Roesch R
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Dec; 29(6):723-42. PubMed ID: 16382358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.