124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1545198)
21. Radiographic study of alveolar bone height related to tooth and root length.
Eliasson S; Lavstedt S; Ljungheimer C
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1986 Jun; 14(3):169-71. PubMed ID: 3459616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Dental CT imaging as a screening tool for dental profiling: advantages and limitations.
Thali MJ; Markwalder T; Jackowski C; Sonnenschein M; Dirnhofer R
J Forensic Sci; 2006 Jan; 51(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 16423234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Troubleshooting vinyl polysiloxane impressions.
Pesun IJ; Mayclin T
Northwest Dent; 1999; 78(1):29-32. PubMed ID: 10726583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. iDENTIfyme Informative Campaign: Raising Forensic Dental Identification Awareness in the Community.
Nuzzolese E
J Prev Med Public Health; 2021 May; 54(3):218-219. PubMed ID: 34092068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A clinical comparison of two vinyl polysiloxane impression materials using the one-step technique.
Raigrodski AJ; Dogan S; Mancl LA; Heindl H
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 19703625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A simplified reliable impression technique using vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
Pameijer CH
J Conn State Dent Assoc; 1983 Oct; 57(4):159-60. PubMed ID: 6421899
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Accuracy of a reformulated fast-set vinyl polysiloxane impression material using dual-arch trays.
Kang AH; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Wataha JC
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):332-41. PubMed ID: 19410067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Vinyl polysiloxane impression material in removable prosthodontics part 3: implant and external impressions.
Massad JJ; Cagna DR
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2007 Oct; 28(10):554-60; quiz 561. PubMed ID: 18018390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comment on: An analysis of the first and second mandibular molar roots proximity to the inferior alveolar canal and cortical plates using cone beam computed tomography among Saudi population.
Mawardi H
Saudi Med J; 2019 Apr; 40(4):409. PubMed ID: 30957139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Craniofacial identification by comparison of antemortem and postmortem radiographs: two case reports dealing with burnt bodies.
Campobasso CP; Dell'Erba AS; Belviso M; Di Vella G
Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2007 Jun; 28(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 17525575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of clinical and statistical models in age estimation using dental periapical radiographic parameters.
Morse DR; Esposito JV; Schoor RS; Gorin R
Compendium; 1993 Jun; 14(6):832, 834, 836 passim. PubMed ID: 8221754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Comparison of castings obtained using 2 impression materials. Van-R reversible hydrocolloid and vinyl polysiloxane 3M Express].
Zemella A
Dent Cadmos; 1986 Nov; 54(17):81-8. PubMed ID: 3556232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Postmortem tooth loss in human identification processes.
Oliveira RN; Melani RF; Antunes JL; Freitas ER; Galvão LC
J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2000 Dec; 18(2):32-6. PubMed ID: 11324268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Dental biometrics: alignment and matching of dental radiographs.
Chen H; Jain AK
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2005 Aug; 27(8):1319-26. PubMed ID: 16119269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Preliminary research on radiographic manifestations of health odontal and periodontal tissues in elderly people].
Wang X; Wang J
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1997 May; 32(3):155-7. PubMed ID: 10680526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Modification of immediate denture sectional impression technique using vinyl polysiloxane.
Gardner LK; Parr GR; Rahn AO
J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Aug; 64(2):182-4. PubMed ID: 2202817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A technique for vaginal casting utilizing vinyl polysiloxane dental impression material.
Pendergrass PB; Reeves CA; Belovicz MW
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 1991; 32(2):121-2. PubMed ID: 1748321
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The discrimination potential of amalgam restorations for identification: part 1.
Phillips VM; Stuhlinger M
J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2009 Jun; 27(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 22717954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A functional open-tray impression technique for implant-retained overdenture prostheses.
Ozcelik TB; Yilmaz B
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):617-9. PubMed ID: 21651416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Root morphology and anatomical patterns in forensic dental identification: a comparison of computer-aided identification with traditional forensic dental identification.
van der Meer DT; Brumit PC; Schrader BA; Dove SB; Senn DR
J Forensic Sci; 2010 Nov; 55(6):1499-503. PubMed ID: 20629904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
