These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1545198)
21. Radiographic study of alveolar bone height related to tooth and root length. Eliasson S; Lavstedt S; Ljungheimer C Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1986 Jun; 14(3):169-71. PubMed ID: 3459616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Dental CT imaging as a screening tool for dental profiling: advantages and limitations. Thali MJ; Markwalder T; Jackowski C; Sonnenschein M; Dirnhofer R J Forensic Sci; 2006 Jan; 51(1):113-9. PubMed ID: 16423234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. iDENTIfyme Informative Campaign: Raising Forensic Dental Identification Awareness in the Community. Nuzzolese E J Prev Med Public Health; 2021 May; 54(3):218-219. PubMed ID: 34092068 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A clinical comparison of two vinyl polysiloxane impression materials using the one-step technique. Raigrodski AJ; Dogan S; Mancl LA; Heindl H J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 19703625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A simplified reliable impression technique using vinyl polysiloxane impression materials. Pameijer CH J Conn State Dent Assoc; 1983 Oct; 57(4):159-60. PubMed ID: 6421899 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Accuracy of a reformulated fast-set vinyl polysiloxane impression material using dual-arch trays. Kang AH; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Wataha JC J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):332-41. PubMed ID: 19410067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Vinyl polysiloxane impression material in removable prosthodontics part 3: implant and external impressions. Massad JJ; Cagna DR Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2007 Oct; 28(10):554-60; quiz 561. PubMed ID: 18018390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comment on: An analysis of the first and second mandibular molar roots proximity to the inferior alveolar canal and cortical plates using cone beam computed tomography among Saudi population. Mawardi H Saudi Med J; 2019 Apr; 40(4):409. PubMed ID: 30957139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Craniofacial identification by comparison of antemortem and postmortem radiographs: two case reports dealing with burnt bodies. Campobasso CP; Dell'Erba AS; Belviso M; Di Vella G Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2007 Jun; 28(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 17525575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of clinical and statistical models in age estimation using dental periapical radiographic parameters. Morse DR; Esposito JV; Schoor RS; Gorin R Compendium; 1993 Jun; 14(6):832, 834, 836 passim. PubMed ID: 8221754 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Comparison of castings obtained using 2 impression materials. Van-R reversible hydrocolloid and vinyl polysiloxane 3M Express]. Zemella A Dent Cadmos; 1986 Nov; 54(17):81-8. PubMed ID: 3556232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Dental biometrics: alignment and matching of dental radiographs. Chen H; Jain AK IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2005 Aug; 27(8):1319-26. PubMed ID: 16119269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Preliminary research on radiographic manifestations of health odontal and periodontal tissues in elderly people]. Wang X; Wang J Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1997 May; 32(3):155-7. PubMed ID: 10680526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Modification of immediate denture sectional impression technique using vinyl polysiloxane. Gardner LK; Parr GR; Rahn AO J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Aug; 64(2):182-4. PubMed ID: 2202817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The discrimination potential of amalgam restorations for identification: part 1. Phillips VM; Stuhlinger M J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2009 Jun; 27(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 22717954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A functional open-tray impression technique for implant-retained overdenture prostheses. Ozcelik TB; Yilmaz B J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):617-9. PubMed ID: 21651416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Root morphology and anatomical patterns in forensic dental identification: a comparison of computer-aided identification with traditional forensic dental identification. van der Meer DT; Brumit PC; Schrader BA; Dove SB; Senn DR J Forensic Sci; 2010 Nov; 55(6):1499-503. PubMed ID: 20629904 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]