These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1545198)

  • 41. Different implant impression techniques for edentulous patients treated with CAD/CAM complete-arch prostheses: a randomised controlled trial reporting data at 3 year post-loading.
    Pozzi A; Tallarico M; Mangani F; Barlattani A
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013; 6(4):325-40. PubMed ID: 24570979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Clinical procedures using vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Boghosian A
    Dent Today; 1991 Oct; 10(8):40, 42. PubMed ID: 1815663
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Estimation of alveolar crest height using routine periapical dental radiographs.
    Duinkerke AS; Van de Poel AC; Purdell-Lewis DJ; Doesburg WH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Nov; 62(5):603-6. PubMed ID: 3537897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Forensic Odontology: Automatic Identification of Persons Comparing Antemortem and Postmortem Panoramic Radiographs Using Computer Vision.
    Heinrich A; Güttler F; Wendt S; Schenkl S; Hubig M; Wagner R; Mall G; Teichgräber U
    Rofo; 2018 Dec; 190(12):1152-1158. PubMed ID: 29913524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Use of a non-volatile agent to stabilize severely incinerated dental remains.
    Berketa J; James H; Langlois N; Richards L; Pigou P
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2015 Jun; 11(2):228-34. PubMed ID: 25772120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparative dental radiographic identification using flat panel CT.
    Birngruber CG; Obert M; Ramsthaler F; Kreutz K; Verhoff MA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Jun; 209(1-3):e31-4. PubMed ID: 21592696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Influences of differences in tray design and impression material on impression pressure at edentulous mandible.
    Inoue S; Kawara M; Iida T; Iwasaki M; Komiyama O
    J Oral Sci; 2017 Dec; 59(4):505-510. PubMed ID: 28855443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Vinyl polysiloxane impression material in removable prosthodontics. Part 2: Immediate denture and reline impressions.
    Cagna DR; Massad JJ
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2007 Sep; 28(9):519-26; quiz 527-8. PubMed ID: 17907375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of two hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials tested under dry, moist, and wet conditions.
    Petrie CS; Walker MP; O'mahony AM; Spencer P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Oct; 90(4):365-72. PubMed ID: 14564291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Atypical Forensic Dental Identifications.
    Cardoza AR; Wood JD
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2015 Jun; 43(6):303-8. PubMed ID: 26126345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Disposable plastic trays and their effect on polyether and vinyl polysiloxane impression accuracy-an in vitro study.
    Rues S; Stober T; Bargum T; Rammelsberg P; Zenthöfer A
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Mar; 25(3):1475-1484. PubMed ID: 32885321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Usefulness of postmortem dental panoramic X-ray photographs taken using a portable radiography apparatus for dental identification].
    Yamaguchi T; Yamada Y; Yamamoto I; Ohira H; Watanabe A; Ohtani S
    Nihon Hoigaku Zasshi; 2002 Sep; 56(2-3):254-7. PubMed ID: 12415833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A pin amalgam or composite core foundation technique for teeth with minimal coronal structure.
    Mamoun JS; Cervini E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Jun; 91(6):599-602. PubMed ID: 15211306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Accuracy of casts generated from dual-arch impressions.
    Breeding LC; Dixon DL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Oct; 84(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 11044846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. An evaluation of selected vinyl polysiloxane and vinyl polysiloxane-hybrid elastomeric impression materials.
    Megremis S; Tiba A; Vogt K; Geary R; Kuehne J
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Apr; 143(4):405-6. PubMed ID: 22467705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Distortion of disposable plastic stock trays when used with putty vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Cho GC; Chee WW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Oct; 92(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 15507908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Digital dental radiographic identification in the pediatric, mixed and permanent dentitions.
    Wood RE; Kirk NJ; Sweet DJ
    J Forensic Sci; 1999 Sep; 44(5):910-6. PubMed ID: 10486940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Identifying skeletal remains found in a sewer.
    Goodman NR; Himmelberger LK
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Nov; 133(11):1508-13. PubMed ID: 12462694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Three-dimensional interpretation of alveolar bone dehiscences. An anatomical-radiological study--Part I.
    Fuhrmann R
    J Orofac Orthop; 1996 Apr; 57(2):62-74. PubMed ID: 8647559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [The study on surface porosity of die stone. Influence of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials].
    Okuda N; Ueno S; Kawada E; Nakanishi K; Sumii T
    Shikwa Gakuho; 1990 Feb; 90(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 2135095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.