229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1545200)
1. Toneline bite mark photography.
Robinson E; Wentzel J
J Forensic Sci; 1992 Jan; 37(1):195-207. PubMed ID: 1545200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Lack of dental uniqueness between two bite mark suspects.
Pretty IA; Turnbull MD
J Forensic Sci; 2001 Nov; 46(6):1487-91. PubMed ID: 11714165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Photographic techniques of concern in metric bite mark analysis.
Krauss TC
J Forensic Sci; 1984 Apr; 29(2):633-8. PubMed ID: 6726167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Bite mark analysis. Part 1. Methods and overview].
De Valck E
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1995 Jun; 102(6):221-3. PubMed ID: 11836809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computer-based production of bite mark comparison overlays.
Sweet D; Parhar M; Wood RE
J Forensic Sci; 1998 Sep; 43(5):1050-5. PubMed ID: 9729824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A practical technique for the fabrication of transparent bite mark overlays.
Dailey JC
J Forensic Sci; 1991 Mar; 36(2):565-70. PubMed ID: 2066731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Error rates in bite mark analysis in an in vivo animal model.
Avon SL; Victor C; Mayhall JT; Wood RE
Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Sep; 201(1-3):45-55. PubMed ID: 20457498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bite mark analysis and comparison using image perception technology.
van der Velden A; Spiessens M; Willems G
J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2006 Jun; 24(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 16783951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy of bite mark overlays: a comparison of five common methods to produce exemplars from a suspect's dentition.
Sweet D; Bowers CM
J Forensic Sci; 1998 Mar; 43(2):362-7. PubMed ID: 9544542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Court presentation of bite mark evidence.
Drinnan AJ; Melton MJ
Int Dent J; 1985 Dec; 35(4):316-21. PubMed ID: 2419253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of full spectrum digital photography for evidence collection and preservation in cases involving forensic odontology.
Wright FD; Golden GS
Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Sep; 201(1-3):59-67. PubMed ID: 20447784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The use of human skin in the fabrication of a bite mark template: two case reports.
West MH; Barsley RE; Frair J; Seal MD
J Forensic Sci; 1990 Nov; 35(6):1477-85. PubMed ID: 2262782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Photography in bite mark and patterned injury documentation--Part 2: A case study.
Wright FD
J Forensic Sci; 1998 Jul; 43(4):881-7. PubMed ID: 9670513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Identification from bite marks].
Schulz P
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1980 Feb; 35(2):239-43. PubMed ID: 6931762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Bite mark analysis. Part 2. A selection of Dutch cases].
van Dijk EA
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1995 Jun; 102(6):224-7. PubMed ID: 11836810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a methodology for the standardisation and improvement of 'Smartphone' photography of patterned bruises and other cutaneous injuries.
Biggs PR; Evans ST; Jones MD; Theobald PS
Sci Justice; 2013 Sep; 53(3):358-62. PubMed ID: 23937947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Two bite mark cases with inadequate scale references.
Bernstein ML
J Forensic Sci; 1985 Jul; 30(3):958-64. PubMed ID: 4031821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Photographic evidence protocol: the use of digital imaging methods to rectify angular distortion and create life size reproductions of bite mark evidence.
Bowers CM; Johansen RJ
J Forensic Sci; 2002 Jan; 47(1):178-85. PubMed ID: 12064648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison between direct and indirect methods available for human bite mark analysis.
Kouble RF; Craig GT
J Forensic Sci; 2004 Jan; 49(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 14979355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Human bite marks in forensic dentistry.
Wright FD; Dailey JC
Dent Clin North Am; 2001 Apr; 45(2):365-97. PubMed ID: 11370460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
