These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15452325)

  • 1. Sensory exam with a quantitative tuning fork: rapid, sensitive and predictive of SNAP amplitude.
    Merkies IS; Schmitz PI; van Doorn PA
    Neurology; 2004 Sep; 63(6):1138; author reply 1138. PubMed ID: 15452325
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sensory exam with a quantitative tuning fork: rapid, sensitive and predictive of SNAP amplitude.
    Pestronk A; Florence J; Levine T; Al-Lozi MT; Lopate G; Miller T; Ramneantu I; Waheed W; Stambuk M
    Neurology; 2004 Feb; 62(3):461-4. PubMed ID: 14872031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vibratory testing with the 64 Hz Rydel-Seiffer tuning fork and its relation to the sural nerve action potential.
    Xirou S; Kokotis P; Zambelis T; Anagnostou E
    J Peripher Nerv Syst; 2020 Dec; 25(4):395-400. PubMed ID: 33107143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tuning fork (128 Hz) versus neurothesiometer: a comparison of methods of assessing vibration sensation in patients with diabetes mellitus.
    O'Neill J; McCann SM; Lagan KM
    Int J Clin Pract; 2006 Feb; 60(2):174-8. PubMed ID: 16451290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reduced amplitude of the sural nerve sensory action potential in PARK2 patients.
    Ohsawa Y; Kurokawa K; Sonoo M; Yamada H; Hemmi S; Iwatsuki K; Hagiwara H; Murakami T; Shirabe T; Shimizu T; Sunada Y
    Neurology; 2005 Aug; 65(3):459-62. PubMed ID: 16087916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The conventional tuning fork as a quantitative tool for vibration threshold.
    Alanazy MH; Alfurayh NA; Almweisheer SN; Aljafen BN; Muayqil T
    Muscle Nerve; 2018 Jan; 57(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 28466970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrophysiological markers of large fibre sensory neuropathy: a study of sensory and motor conduction parameters.
    Rajabally YA; Beri S; Bankart J
    Eur J Neurol; 2009 Sep; 16(9):1053-9. PubMed ID: 19486140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical versus quantitative vibration assessment: improving clinical performance.
    Burns TM; Taly A; O'Brien PC; Dyck PJ
    J Peripher Nerv Syst; 2002 Jun; 7(2):112-7. PubMed ID: 12090297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sural sensory action potential identifies diabetic peripheral neuropathy responders to therapy.
    Vinik AI; Bril V; Litchy WJ; Price KL; Bastyr EJ;
    Muscle Nerve; 2005 Nov; 32(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 16116628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The assessment of vibration sense in the musculoskeletal examination: Moving towards a valid and reliable quantitative approach to vibration testing in clinical practice.
    O' Conaire E; Rushton A; Wright C
    Man Ther; 2011 Jun; 16(3):296-300. PubMed ID: 21339080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Superficial radial sensory nerve potentials in immune-mediated and diabetic neuropathies.
    Tamura N; Kuwabara S; Misawa S; Mori M; Nakata M; Hattori T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Oct; 116(10):2330-3. PubMed ID: 16122982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnostic Accuracy of Clinical Methods for Detection of Diabetic Sensory Neuropathy.
    Arshad AR; Alvi KY
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2016 May; 26(5):374-9. PubMed ID: 27225141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Test-retest and time dependent variation and diagnostic values of vibratory sensation determined by biothesiometer and the Rydel-Seiffer tuning fork.
    Wittenberg B; Svendsen TK; Gaist LM; Itani M; Gylfadottir SS; Jensen TS; Gaist D; Sindrup SH; Krøigård T
    Brain Behav; 2021 Aug; 11(8):e2230. PubMed ID: 34087955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measuring vibration threshold with a graduated tuning fork in normal aging and in patients with polyneuropathy. European Inflammatory Neuropathy Cause and Treatment (INCAT) group.
    Martina IS; van Koningsveld R; Schmitz PI; van der Meché FG; van Doorn PA
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 1998 Nov; 65(5):743-7. PubMed ID: 9810949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Somatosensory evoked potentials and sensory involvement in multiple sclerosis: comparison with clinical findings and quantitative sensory tests.
    Leocani L; Martinelli V; Natali-Sora MG; Rovaris M; Comi G
    Mult Scler; 2003 Jun; 9(3):275-9. PubMed ID: 12814174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of sural nerve conduction studies in patients with impaired oral glucose tolerance test.
    Koçer A; Domaç FM; Boylu E; Us O; Tanridağ T
    Acta Neurol Scand; 2007 Dec; 116(6):399-405. PubMed ID: 17986099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An alternative to a 10-g monofilament or tuning fork? Two new, simple, easy-to-use screening tests for determining foot ulcer risk in people with diabetes.
    Baker N
    Diabet Med; 2012 Dec; 29(12):1477-9. PubMed ID: 22686252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative measurement of vibratory perception threshold using a new vibrometer TM-31A.
    Kamon N
    J Occup Med; 1994 Sep; 36(9):989-96. PubMed ID: 7823221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neurophysiological examination of dorsal sural nerve.
    Frigeni B; Cacciavillani M; Ermani M; Briani C; Alberti P; Ferrarese C; Cavaletti G
    Muscle Nerve; 2012 Dec; 46(6):895-8. PubMed ID: 23042443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quantitative sensory testing of cold and vibration perception during compression of median nerve at the wrist.
    Tsuboya H; Tani T; Ishida K; Ushida T; Taniguchi S; Kimura J
    Muscle Nerve; 2007 Apr; 35(4):458-64. PubMed ID: 17195168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.