These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15454414)

  • 1. An efficient Monte Carlo approach to assessing statistical significance in genomic studies.
    Lin DY
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Mar; 21(6):781-7. PubMed ID: 15454414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies.
    Datta S; Datta S
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1987-94. PubMed ID: 15691856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multidimensional local false discovery rate for microarray studies.
    Ploner A; Calza S; Gusnanto A; Pawitan Y
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 22(5):556-65. PubMed ID: 16368770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A note on using permutation-based false discovery rate estimates to compare different analysis methods for microarray data.
    Xie Y; Pan W; Khodursky AB
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4280-8. PubMed ID: 16188930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Significance analysis of functional categories in gene expression studies: a structured permutation approach.
    Barry WT; Nobel AB; Wright FA
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1943-9. PubMed ID: 15647293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Some comments on instability of false discovery rate estimation.
    Qiu X; Yakovlev A
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2006 Oct; 4(5):1057-68. PubMed ID: 17099941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistical analysis of global gene expression data: some practical considerations.
    Holzman T; Kolker E
    Curr Opin Biotechnol; 2004 Feb; 15(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 15102467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A generalized likelihood ratio test to identify differentially expressed genes from microarray data.
    Wang S; Ethier S
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Jan; 20(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 14693815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Construction of null statistics in permutation-based multiple testing for multi-factorial microarray experiments.
    Gao X
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jun; 22(12):1486-94. PubMed ID: 16574697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian hierarchical error model for analysis of gene expression data.
    Cho H; Lee JK
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Sep; 20(13):2016-25. PubMed ID: 15044230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of microarray designs for class comparison and class discovery.
    Dobbin K; Simon R
    Bioinformatics; 2002 Nov; 18(11):1438-45. PubMed ID: 12424114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A simple procedure for estimating the false discovery rate.
    Dalmasso C; Broët P; Moreau T
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Mar; 21(5):660-8. PubMed ID: 15479710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Identifying periodically expressed transcripts in microarray time series data.
    Wichert S; Fokianos K; Strimmer K
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Jan; 20(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 14693803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sample size for gene expression microarray experiments.
    Tsai CA; Wang SJ; Chen DT; Chen JJ
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 21(8):1502-8. PubMed ID: 15564298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Controlling false-negative errors in microarray differential expression analysis: a PRIM approach.
    Cole SW; Galic Z; Zack JA
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Sep; 19(14):1808-16. PubMed ID: 14512352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating p-values in small microarray experiments.
    Yang H; Churchill G
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 23(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 17077100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Two-part permutation tests for DNA methylation and microarray data.
    Neuhäuser M; Boes T; Jöckel KH
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():35. PubMed ID: 15725357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Venn Mapping: clustering of heterologous microarray data based on the number of co-occurring differentially expressed genes.
    Smid M; Dorssers LC; Jenster G
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Nov; 19(16):2065-71. PubMed ID: 14594711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Detection of low level genomic alterations by comparative genomic hybridization based on cDNA micro-arrays.
    Bilke S; Chen QR; Whiteford CC; Khan J
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 21(7):1138-45. PubMed ID: 15539449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Nonparametric methods for identifying differentially expressed genes in microarray data.
    Troyanskaya OG; Garber ME; Brown PO; Botstein D; Altman RB
    Bioinformatics; 2002 Nov; 18(11):1454-61. PubMed ID: 12424116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.