These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15454600)

  • 1. Uptake for cervical screening by ethnicity and place-of-birth: a population-based cross-sectional study.
    Webb R; Richardson J; Esmail A; Pickles A
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2004 Sep; 26(3):293-6. PubMed ID: 15454600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A population-based study of primary care predictors of non-attendance for cervical screening.
    Webb R; Richardson J; Pickles A
    J Med Screen; 2004; 11(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 15333272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Pap test screening clinic in a South Asian community of Vancouver, British Columbia: challenges to maintaining utilization.
    Grewal S; Bottorff JL; Balneaves LG
    Public Health Nurs; 2004; 21(5):412-8. PubMed ID: 15363021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Social support and cervical and breast cancer screening in Argentinean women from a rural population.
    Gamarra CJ; Paz EP; Griep RH
    Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):269-76. PubMed ID: 19386062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CAPRELA (Cancer Prevention for Latinas): findings of a pilot study in Winston-Salem, Forsyth County.
    Koval AE; Riganti AA; Foley KL
    N C Med J; 2006; 67(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16550986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inadequacy of cervical cancer screening among urban recent immigrants: a population-based study of physician and laboratory claims in Toronto, Canada.
    Lofters A; Glazier RH; Agha MM; Creatore MI; Moineddin R
    Prev Med; 2007 Jun; 44(6):536-42. PubMed ID: 17467782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Screening for cervical cancer among female physicians and their relatives in Taiwan: a population-based comparative study.
    Chen LS; Huang N; Tsay JH; Wang PJ; Chou YJ; Chou P; Lee CH
    Prev Med; 2007 Jun; 44(6):531-5. PubMed ID: 17467786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exploring the effects of population mobility on cervical screening coverage.
    Millett C; Bardsley M; Binysh K
    Public Health; 2002 Nov; 116(6):353-60. PubMed ID: 12407475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cervical cancer screening in the Ferrara Local Health Authority catchment area.
    Bergamini M; Buriani O; Cucchi A; De Togni A; Carpanelli MC; Cervato K; Gigli F; Pizzo F; Ravasini G; Rauli G; Rizzello R; Gregorio P
    J Prev Med Hyg; 2007 Dec; 48(4):141-8. PubMed ID: 18557309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cervical screening in HIV-positive women: characteristics of those who default and attitudes towards screening.
    Shah S; Montgomery H; Smith C; Madge S; Walker P; Evans H; Johnson M; Sabin C
    HIV Med; 2006 Jan; 7(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 16313292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of cervical cancer screening program at a rural community of South Africa.
    Hoque M; Hoque E; Kader SB
    East Afr J Public Health; 2008 Aug; 5(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 19024420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is there a language divide in pap test use?
    Ponce NA; Chawla N; Babey SH; Gatchell MS; Etzioni DA; Spencer BA; Brown ER; Breen N
    Med Care; 2006 Nov; 44(11):998-1004. PubMed ID: 17063131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Uptake of cervical cancer screening in The Netherlands is mainly influenced by women's beliefs about the screening and by the inviting organization.
    Tacken MA; Braspenning JC; Hermens RP; Spreeuwenberg PM; van den Hoogen HJ; de Bakker DH; Groenewegen PP; Grol RP
    Eur J Public Health; 2007 Apr; 17(2):178-85. PubMed ID: 16837520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The efficacy of a national Family Health Services Authority based cervical cytology system.
    Amery J; Beardow R; Oerton J; Victor C
    Health Trends; 1992; 24(4):119-22. PubMed ID: 10123981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Transtheoretical Model and cervical screening: its application among culturally diverse communities in Queensland, Australia.
    Kelaher M; Gillespie AG; Allotey P; Manderson L; Potts H; Sheldrake M; Young M
    Ethn Health; 1999 Nov; 4(4):259-76. PubMed ID: 10705563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Screening mammography: a cross-sectional study to compare characteristics of women aged 40 and older from the deep South who are current, overdue, and never screeners.
    Lopez ED; Khoury AJ; Dailey AB; Hall AG; Chisholm LR
    Womens Health Issues; 2009; 19(6):434-45. PubMed ID: 19879455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Explaining variation in antidepressant prescribing rates in east London: a cross sectional study.
    Hull SA; Aquino P; Cotter S
    Fam Pract; 2005 Feb; 22(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 15640295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A descriptive study of the decline in cervical screening coverage rates in the North East and Yorkshire and the Humber regions of the UK from 1995 to 2005.
    Willoughby BJ; Faulkner K; Stamp EC; Whitaker CJ
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2006 Dec; 28(4):355-60. PubMed ID: 17062818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A cross-border comparison of breast and cervical cancer screening uptake.
    Walsh B; Silles M; O'Neill C
    Ir Med J; 2010; 103(10):297-300. PubMed ID: 21560499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The health-care practices of Vietnamese-Canadian women: cultural influences on breast and cervical cancer screening.
    Donnelly TT
    Can J Nurs Res; 2006 Mar; 38(1):82-101. PubMed ID: 16671282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.