BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

57 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15455334)

  • 1. Indications, methods, and results of cemented, hybrid, and cement-free implantation of THR.
    Krückhans AR; Dustmann HO
    Surg Technol Int; 2004; 12():253-7. PubMed ID: 15455334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Periprosthetic fractures of the hip].
    Weissinger M; Helmreich C; Pöll G
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Jun; 76(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 19595278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New polymer materials in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation with radiostereometry, bone densitometry, radiography and clinical parameters.
    Digas G
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2005 Feb; 76(315):3-82. PubMed ID: 15790289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Metal-on-metal hip replacement using Metasul cups cemented into Muller reinforcement rings after a mean 5-year (3-8) follow-up: improvement of acetabular fixation by comparing with direct cementation to bone].
    Girard J; Herent S; Combes A; Pinoit Y; Soenen M; Laffargue P; Migaud H
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Jun; 94(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 18555860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does cement increase the risk of infection in primary total hip arthroplasty? Revision rates in 56,275 cemented and uncemented primary THAs followed for 0-16 years in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register.
    Engesaeter LB; Espehaug B; Lie SA; Furnes O; Havelin LI
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Jun; 77(3):351-8. PubMed ID: 16819671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Feb; 74(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 17331456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using the modular revision prosthesis MRP-TITAN revision stem.
    Mumme T; Müller-Rath R; Andereya S; Wirtz DC
    Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2007 Mar; 19(1):56-77. PubMed ID: 17345027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hybrid total hip replacement: outcome after a mean follow up of 10 years.
    Horne G; Culliford N; Adams K; Devane P
    ANZ J Surg; 2007 Aug; 77(8):638-41. PubMed ID: 17635275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Outcomes of the MS-30 cemented femoral stem.
    Morscher EW; Berli B; Clauss M; Grappiolo G
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2005; 72(3):153-9. PubMed ID: 16105497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Different loss of BMD using uncemented press-fit and whole polyethylene cups fixed with cement: repeated DXA studies in 96 hips randomized to 3 types of fixation.
    Digas G; Kärrholm J; Thanner J
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Apr; 77(2):218-26. PubMed ID: 16752282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Operating time and survival of primary total hip replacements: an analysis of 31,745 primary cemented and uncemented total hip replacements from local hospitals reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1987-2001.
    Småbrekke A; Espehaug B; Havelin LI; Furnes O
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2004 Oct; 75(5):524-32. PubMed ID: 15513482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Ten-year experience with the Aldinger custom-made total hip arthroplasty: evaluation of the results].
    Masár J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Jun; 74(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 17623605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Current state of cement fixation in THR.
    Morscher EW; Wirz D
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2002 Feb; 68(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 11915452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Poor results with the Shuttle Stop: resorbable versus nonresorbable intramedullar cement restrictor in a prospective and randomized study with a 2-year follow-up.
    Freund KG; Herold N; Røck ND; Riegels-Nielsen P
    Acta Orthop Scand; 2003 Feb; 74(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 12635790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Should monobloc cemented stems be systematically revised during revision total hip arthroplasty? A prospective evaluation].
    Grosjean G; Courpied JP; Moindreau M; Hunou N; Mathieu M; Hamadouche M
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Nov; 94(7):670-7. PubMed ID: 18984124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Uncemented total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in young patients: a mid-to long-term follow-up study from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
    Eskelinen A; Remes V; Helenius I; Pulkkinen P; Nevalainen J; Paavolainen P
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Feb; 77(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 16534703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthrosis in younger patients in the Finnish arthroplasty register. 4,661 primary replacements followed for 0-22 years.
    Eskelinen A; Remes V; Helenius I; Pulkkinen P; Nevalainen J; Paavolainen P
    Acta Orthop; 2005 Feb; 76(1):28-41. PubMed ID: 15788305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Single-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty in patients less than 35 years. Forty arthroplasties with 5-17 years follow-up.
    Simon JP; Robbens E; Maes M; Bellemans J
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2009 Apr; 75(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 19492558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Total hip arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis in younger patients: 2,557 replacements in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register followed for 0-24 years.
    Eskelinen A; Paavolainen P; Helenius I; Pulkkinen P; Remes V
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Dec; 77(6):853-65. PubMed ID: 17260192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inferior stability of a biodegradable cement plug. 122 total hip replacements randomized to degradable or non-degradable cement restrictor.
    Schauss SM; Hinz M; Mayr E; Bach CM; Krismer M; Fischer M
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2006 Jul; 126(5):324-9. PubMed ID: 16612619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.