435 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15455747)
1. Expanded mesh connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions.
Cetiner D; Bodur A; Uraz A
J Periodontol; 2004 Aug; 75(8):1167-72. PubMed ID: 15455747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of multiple gingival recession.
Dembowska E; Drozdzik A
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Sep; 104(3):e1-7. PubMed ID: 17618142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modified coronally advanced flap associated with a subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of adjacent multiple gingival recessions.
Carvalho PF; da Silva RC; Cury PR; Joly JC
J Periodontol; 2006 Nov; 77(11):1901-6. PubMed ID: 17076617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative clinical study of guided tissue regeneration with a bioabsorbable bilayer collagen membrane and subepithelial connective tissue graft.
Romagna-Genon C
J Periodontol; 2001 Sep; 72(9):1258-64. PubMed ID: 11577960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Subpedicle acellular dermal matrix graft and autogenous connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recessions: a comparative 1-year clinical study.
Paolantonio M; Dolci M; Esposito P; D'Archivio D; Lisanti L; Di Luccio A; Perinetti G
J Periodontol; 2002 Nov; 73(11):1299-307. PubMed ID: 12479634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparative study of root coverage with connective tissue and platelet concentrate grafts: 8-month results.
Cheung WS; Griffin TJ
J Periodontol; 2004 Dec; 75(12):1678-87. PubMed ID: 15732871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative clinical study of connective tissue graft and two types of bioabsorbable barriers in the treatment of localized gingival recessions.
Cetiner D; Parlar A; Baloş K; Alpar R
J Periodontol; 2003 Aug; 74(8):1196-205. PubMed ID: 14514234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. EMD or subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of single gingival recessions: a pilot study.
Alkan EA; Parlar A
J Periodontal Res; 2011 Dec; 46(6):637-42. PubMed ID: 21631510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Treatment of gingival recessions by combined periodontal regenerative technique, guided tissue regeneration, and subpedicle connective tissue graft. A comparative clinical study.
Paolantonio M
J Periodontol; 2002 Jan; 73(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 11846201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treatment of multiple adjacent Miller class I and II gingival recessions with a Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel (MCAT) technique and a collagen matrix or palatal connective tissue graft: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
Aroca S; Molnár B; Windisch P; Gera I; Salvi GE; Nikolidakis D; Sculean A
J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Jul; 40(7):713-20. PubMed ID: 23627374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of 2 techniques of subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recessions.
Cordioli G; Mortarino C; Chierico A; Grusovin MG; Majzoub Z
J Periodontol; 2001 Nov; 72(11):1470-6. PubMed ID: 11759857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Treatment of gingival recession: comparative study between subepithelial connective tissue graft and guided tissue regeneration.
Rosetti EP; Marcantonio RA; Rossa C; Chaves ES; Goissis G; Marcantonio E
J Periodontol; 2000 Sep; 71(9):1441-7. PubMed ID: 11022773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Semilunar coronally positioned flap or subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession: a 30-month follow-up study.
Bittencourt S; Ribeiro Edel P; Sallum EA; Sallum AW; Nociti FH; Casati MZ
J Periodontol; 2009 Jul; 80(7):1076-82. PubMed ID: 19563287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Harvesting technique using a mucotome and modified surgical procedure for root coverage with enamel matrix derivatives with and without a connective tissue graft.
Gunay H; Dogan S; Geurtsen W
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Oct; 28(5):497-507. PubMed ID: 18991001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A multicenter comparative study of two root coverage procedures: coronally advanced flap with addition of enamel matrix proteins and subpedicle connective tissue graft.
Nemcovsky CE; Artzi Z; Tal H; Kozlovsky A; Moses O
J Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 75(4):600-7. PubMed ID: 15152826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Enamel matrix derivative (emdogain) or subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of adjacent multiple gingival recessions: a pilot study.
Alkan EA; Parlar A
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2013; 33(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 23998158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Treatment of multiple recession-type defects in patients with esthetic demands.
Zucchelli G; De Sanctis M
J Periodontol; 2000 Sep; 71(9):1506-14. PubMed ID: 11022782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Acellular dermal matrix allograft versus subepithelial connective tissue graft in treatment of gingival recessions: a 5-year randomized clinical study.
Moslemi N; Mousavi Jazi M; Haghighati F; Morovati SP; Jamali R
J Clin Periodontol; 2011 Dec; 38(12):1122-9. PubMed ID: 22092784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Treatment of adjacent gingival recessions with subepithelial connective tissue grafts and the modified tunnel technique.
Tözüm TF; Dini FM
Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 12674352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 1: Comparison of clinical parameters.
McGuire MK; Nunn M
J Periodontol; 2003 Aug; 74(8):1110-25. PubMed ID: 14514224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
