These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15455810)

  • 21. [Maternal morbidity after Thierry's spatulas and vacuum deliveries].
    Menard JP; Provansal M; Heckenroth H; Gamerre M; Bretelle F; Mazouni C
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2008 Jun; 36(6):623-7. PubMed ID: 18539070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Foetal and maternal outcome of vacuum extraction.
    Gachiri JR; Rogo KO
    East Afr Med J; 1991 Jul; 68(7):539-46. PubMed ID: 1756706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of instrument preference for operative deliveries on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes.
    Abenhaim HA; Morin L; Benjamin A; Kinch RA
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Oct; 134(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 17112650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Prospective assessment of vacuum deliveries from midpelvic station in a tertiary care university hospital: Frequency, failure rates, labor characteristics and maternal and neonatal complications.
    Sugulle M; Halldórsdóttir E; Kvile J; Berntzen LSD; Jacobsen AF
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0259926. PubMed ID: 34784382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Outcome of forceps delivery versus vacuum extraction--a review of 200 cases.
    Achanna S; Monga D
    Singapore Med J; 1994 Dec; 35(6):605-8. PubMed ID: 7761886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes between vacuum extraction and forceps deliveries.
    Mesleh RA; Al-Sawadi HM; Kurdi AM
    Saudi Med J; 2002 Jul; 23(7):811-3. PubMed ID: 12174231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A randomised controlled trial of a new handheld vacuum extraction device.
    Attilakos G; Sibanda T; Winter C; Johnson N; Draycott T
    BJOG; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1510-5. PubMed ID: 16225571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Operative vaginal delivery: a comparison of forceps and vacuum for success rate and risk of rectal sphincter injury.
    Damron DP; Capeless EL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Sep; 191(3):907-10. PubMed ID: 15467563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria.
    Weerasekera DS; Premaratne S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):344-5. PubMed ID: 12521450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Decision-to-delivery interval for instrumental vaginal deliveries: vacuum extraction versus forceps.
    Lurie S; Glezerman M; Baider C; Sadan O
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2006 Apr; 274(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 16408184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Vacuum extraction: use in a small rural hospital.
    Sennett ES; Fallis GB
    Can Med Assoc J; 1983 Sep; 129(6):575-8. PubMed ID: 6883259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Is the vacuum extractor really the instrument of first choice?
    Chan CC; Malathi I; Yeo GS
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 39(3):305-9. PubMed ID: 10554939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Instrumental rotational delivery in primiparae.
    Gleeson NC; Gormally SM; Morrison JJ; O'Regan M
    Ir Med J; 1992 Dec; 85(4):139-41. PubMed ID: 1473948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Can deliveries at risk be selected at smaller delivery units?].
    Holt J; Vold IN
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1998 Mar; 118(8):1218-20. PubMed ID: 9567699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Failed individual and sequential instrumental vaginal delivery: contributing risk factors and maternal-neonatal complications.
    Al-Kadri H; Sabr Y; Al-Saif S; Abulaimoun B; Ba'Aqeel H; Saleh A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2003 Jul; 82(7):642-8. PubMed ID: 12790846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Vacuum delivery at The Maternity Hospital Kuala Lumpur: a comparison of metal and silicone cups.
    Lee HY; Subramaniam N; Nordin MM
    Singapore Med J; 1996 Feb; 37(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 8783915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Cesarean section for failed vacuum extraction: risk factors and maternal and neonatal outcomes].
    Miot S; Riethmuller D; Deleplancque K; Teffaud O; Martin M; Maillet R; Schaal JP
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2004; 32(7-8):607-12. PubMed ID: 15450259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Vacuum-assisted delivery: a review.
    McQuivey RW
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2004 Sep; 16(3):171-80. PubMed ID: 15590444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Maternal and neonatal immediate effects of sequential delivery.
    Barata S; Cardoso E; Ferreira Santo S; Clode N; Mendes Graça L
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Jul; 25(7):981-3. PubMed ID: 21740319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Mode of delivery in nulliparous women and neonatal intracranial injury.
    Werner EF; Janevic TM; Illuzzi J; Funai EF; Savitz DA; Lipkind HS
    Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Dec; 118(6):1239-1246. PubMed ID: 22105252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.