These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15455810)
21. [Maternal morbidity after Thierry's spatulas and vacuum deliveries]. Menard JP; Provansal M; Heckenroth H; Gamerre M; Bretelle F; Mazouni C Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2008 Jun; 36(6):623-7. PubMed ID: 18539070 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Foetal and maternal outcome of vacuum extraction. Gachiri JR; Rogo KO East Afr Med J; 1991 Jul; 68(7):539-46. PubMed ID: 1756706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of instrument preference for operative deliveries on obstetrical and neonatal outcomes. Abenhaim HA; Morin L; Benjamin A; Kinch RA Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Oct; 134(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 17112650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Prospective assessment of vacuum deliveries from midpelvic station in a tertiary care university hospital: Frequency, failure rates, labor characteristics and maternal and neonatal complications. Sugulle M; Halldórsdóttir E; Kvile J; Berntzen LSD; Jacobsen AF PLoS One; 2021; 16(11):e0259926. PubMed ID: 34784382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Outcome of forceps delivery versus vacuum extraction--a review of 200 cases. Achanna S; Monga D Singapore Med J; 1994 Dec; 35(6):605-8. PubMed ID: 7761886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes between vacuum extraction and forceps deliveries. Mesleh RA; Al-Sawadi HM; Kurdi AM Saudi Med J; 2002 Jul; 23(7):811-3. PubMed ID: 12174231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A randomised controlled trial of a new handheld vacuum extraction device. Attilakos G; Sibanda T; Winter C; Johnson N; Draycott T BJOG; 2005 Nov; 112(11):1510-5. PubMed ID: 16225571 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Operative vaginal delivery: a comparison of forceps and vacuum for success rate and risk of rectal sphincter injury. Damron DP; Capeless EL Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Sep; 191(3):907-10. PubMed ID: 15467563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria. Weerasekera DS; Premaratne S J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):344-5. PubMed ID: 12521450 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Decision-to-delivery interval for instrumental vaginal deliveries: vacuum extraction versus forceps. Lurie S; Glezerman M; Baider C; Sadan O Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2006 Apr; 274(1):34-6. PubMed ID: 16408184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Vacuum extraction: use in a small rural hospital. Sennett ES; Fallis GB Can Med Assoc J; 1983 Sep; 129(6):575-8. PubMed ID: 6883259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Is the vacuum extractor really the instrument of first choice? Chan CC; Malathi I; Yeo GS Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 39(3):305-9. PubMed ID: 10554939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Instrumental rotational delivery in primiparae. Gleeson NC; Gormally SM; Morrison JJ; O'Regan M Ir Med J; 1992 Dec; 85(4):139-41. PubMed ID: 1473948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Can deliveries at risk be selected at smaller delivery units?]. Holt J; Vold IN Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1998 Mar; 118(8):1218-20. PubMed ID: 9567699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Vacuum delivery at The Maternity Hospital Kuala Lumpur: a comparison of metal and silicone cups. Lee HY; Subramaniam N; Nordin MM Singapore Med J; 1996 Feb; 37(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 8783915 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. [Cesarean section for failed vacuum extraction: risk factors and maternal and neonatal outcomes]. Miot S; Riethmuller D; Deleplancque K; Teffaud O; Martin M; Maillet R; Schaal JP Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2004; 32(7-8):607-12. PubMed ID: 15450259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]