BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15456025)

  • 1. Validation of the NSCP technique on scoliotic vertebrae.
    Mitulescu A; De Guise JA; Dubousset J; Labelle H; Adamsbaum C; Skalli W
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 88():167-71. PubMed ID: 15456025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-dimensional surface rendering reconstruction of scoliotic vertebrae using a non stereo-corresponding points technique.
    Mitulescu A; Skalli W; Mitton D; De Guise JA
    Eur Spine J; 2002 Aug; 11(4):344-52. PubMed ID: 12193996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlation study between indices describing the scoliotic spine.
    Godillon Maquinghen AP; Ouverlot V; Aubin CE; Villemure I; Labelle H
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 88():140-3. PubMed ID: 15456019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validation of the relative 3D orientation of vertebrae reconstructed by bi-planar radiography.
    Dumas R; Le Bras A; Champain N; Savidan M; Mitton D; Kalifa G; Steib JP; de Guise JA; Skalli W
    Med Eng Phys; 2004 Jun; 26(5):415-22. PubMed ID: 15147749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Validation of the non-stereo corresponding points stereoradiographic 3D reconstruction technique.
    Mitulescu A; Semaan I; De Guise JA; Leborgne P; Adamsbaum C; Skalli W
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2001 Mar; 39(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 11361240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 3D biplanar statistical reconstruction of scoliotic vertebrae.
    Benameur S; Mignotte M; Parent S; Labelle H; Skalli W; de Guise JA
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 91():281-5. PubMed ID: 15457738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional reconstruction of the scoliotic spine and pelvis from uncalibrated biplanar x-ray images.
    Kadoury S; Cheriet F; Dansereau J; Labelle H
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Apr; 20(2):160-7. PubMed ID: 17414987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Customized 3D radiographic reconstruction of the human pelvis].
    Gauvin C; Dansereau J; Petit Y; De Guise JA; Labelle H
    Ann Chir; 1998; 52(8):744-51. PubMed ID: 9846424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improving Visibility of Stereo-Radiographic Spine Reconstruction with Geometric Inferences.
    Kumar S; Nayak KP; Hareesha KS
    J Digit Imaging; 2016 Apr; 29(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 26537930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The orientation of the plane of maximum deformity of a scoliotic curve.
    Mouilleseaux B; Hecquet J; Ebermeyer E; Courtois I; Graf H
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 88():157-60. PubMed ID: 15456023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Quantitative analysis of spinal curvature in 3D: application to CT images of normal spine.
    Vrtovec T; Likar B; Pernus F
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Apr; 53(7):1895-908. PubMed ID: 18364545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Three-dimensional biplanar reconstruction of scoliotic rib cage using the estimation of a mixture of probabilistic prior models.
    Benameur S; Mignotte M; Destrempes F; De Guise JA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Oct; 52(10):1713-28. PubMed ID: 16235657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A hierarchical statistical modeling approach for the unsupervised 3-D biplanar reconstruction of the scoliotic spine.
    Benameur S; Mignotte M; Labelle H; De Guise JA
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Dec; 52(12):2041-57. PubMed ID: 16366228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability of 3D reconstruction of the spine of mild scoliotic patients.
    Gille O; Champain N; Benchikh-El-Fegoun A; Vital JM; Skalli W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 17334292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. 3-D back surface analysis of severe idiopathic scoliosis by rasterstereography: comparison of rasterstereographic and digitized radiometric data.
    Hackenberg L; Hierholzer E
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 88():86-9. PubMed ID: 15456008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of rasterstereographs with MR scans in scoliotic patients.
    Hackenberg L; Hierholzer E
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 88():196-9. PubMed ID: 15456031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. 3D detailed reconstruction of vertebrae with low dose digital stereoradiography.
    Le Bras A; Laporte S; Mitton D; de Guise JA; Skalli W
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 91():286-90. PubMed ID: 15457739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Personalised mechanical properties of scoliotic vertebrae determined in vivo using tomodensitometry.
    Périé D; Hobatho MC; Baunin C; Sales De Gauzy J
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2002 Apr; 5(2):161-5. PubMed ID: 12186725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Geometric and postural analysis of mild idiopathic scoliotic patients.
    Champain N; Dupuis R; Pomero V; Mouilleseaux B; Dubousset J; Skalli W
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 91():267-71. PubMed ID: 15457735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Semi-automatic landmark detection in digital X-ray images of the spine.
    Gerard O; Lelong P; Planells-Rodriguez M; Makram-Ebeid S; Verdonck B; Breeuwer M; Nijlunsing R; Cheung J; Veldhuizen A
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 88():132-5. PubMed ID: 15456017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.