These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15456061)

  • 1. The role of disc, facets and fibres in degenerative process: a sensitivity study.
    Dupont P; Lavaste F; Skalli W
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 88():356-9. PubMed ID: 15456061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of single-level lumbar degenerative disc disease on the behavior of the adjacent segments--a finite element model study.
    Ruberté LM; Natarajan RN; Andersson GB
    J Biomech; 2009 Feb; 42(3):341-8. PubMed ID: 19136113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanics of two-level Charité artificial disc placement in comparison to fusion plus single-level disc placement combination.
    Grauer JN; Biyani A; Faizan A; Kiapour A; Sairyo K; Ivanov A; Ebraheim NA; Patel TCh; Goel VK
    Spine J; 2006; 6(6):659-66. PubMed ID: 17088196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of interpersonal geometrical variation on spinal motion segment stiffness: implications for patient-specific modeling.
    Meijer GJ; Homminga J; Veldhuizen AG; Verkerke GJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(14):E929-35. PubMed ID: 21289568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Internal and external responses of anterior lumbar/lumbosacral fusion: nonlinear finite element analysis.
    Guan Y; Yoganandan N; Maiman DJ; Pintar FA
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jun; 21(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 18525492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In situ contact analysis of the prosthesis components of Prodisc-L in lumbar spine following total disc replacement.
    Chen WM; Park C; Lee K; Lee S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(20):E716-23. PubMed ID: 19752690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical effect of constraint in lumbar total disc replacement: a study with finite element analysis.
    Chung SK; Kim YE; Wang KC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1281-6. PubMed ID: 19455003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of different artificial disc kinematics on spine biomechanics.
    Zander T; Rohlmann A; Bergmann G
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Feb; 24(2):135-42. PubMed ID: 19121822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How does the geometry affect the internal biomechanics of a lumbar spine bi-segment finite element model? Consequences on the validation process.
    Noailly J; Wilke HJ; Planell JA; Lacroix D
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(11):2414-25. PubMed ID: 17257603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence prediction of injury and vibration on adjacent components of spine using finite element methods.
    Guo LX; Teo EC
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Apr; 19(2):118-24. PubMed ID: 16760786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Dynesys lumbar spinal stabilization system: a preliminary report on positional magnetic resonance imaging findings.
    Beastall J; Karadimas E; Siddiqui M; Nicol M; Hughes J; Smith F; Wardlaw D
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):685-90. PubMed ID: 17413475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The risk of disc prolapses with complex loading in different degrees of disc degeneration - a finite element analysis.
    Schmidt H; Kettler A; Rohlmann A; Claes L; Wilke HJ
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Nov; 22(9):988-98. PubMed ID: 17822814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Disc arthroplasty design influences intervertebral kinematics and facet forces.
    Rousseau MA; Bradford DS; Bertagnoli R; Hu SS; Lotz JC
    Spine J; 2006; 6(3):258-66. PubMed ID: 16651219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Buck's direct repair of lumbar spondylolysis restores disc stresses at the involved and adjacent levels.
    Sairyo K; Goel VK; Faizan A; Vadapalli S; Biyani S; Ebraheim N
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Dec; 21(10):1020-6. PubMed ID: 16959387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intradiscal pressure, shear strain, and fiber strain in the intervertebral disc under combined loading.
    Schmidt H; Kettler A; Heuer F; Simon U; Claes L; Wilke HJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(7):748-55. PubMed ID: 17414908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of degenerative morphological changes of the intervertebral disc on the lumbar spine biomechanics: a poroelastic finite element investigation.
    Galbusera F; Schmidt H; Neidlinger-Wilke C; Wilke HJ
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2011 Aug; 14(8):729-39. PubMed ID: 21390934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
    Lin CY; Kang H; Rouleau JP; Hollister SJ; Marca FL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Total disc replacement positioning affects facet contact forces and vertebral body strains.
    Rundell SA; Auerbach JD; Balderston RA; Kurtz SM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):2510-7. PubMed ID: 18978591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of the geometry of a ball-and-socket intervertebral prosthesis at the cervical spine: a finite element study.
    Rousseau MA; Bonnet X; Skalli W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(1):E10-4. PubMed ID: 18165735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adjacent segment degeneration: observations in a goat spinal fusion study.
    Hoogendoorn RJ; Helder MN; Wuisman PI; Bank RA; Everts VE; Smit TH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May; 33(12):1337-43. PubMed ID: 18496346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.