These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1545672)

  • 1. Quantification of complex flow using MR phase imaging--a study of parameters influencing the phase/velocity relation.
    Ståhlberg F; Søndergaard L; Thomsen C; Henriksen O
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1992; 10(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 1545672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanisms of flow-induced signal loss in MR angiography.
    Urchuk SN; Plewes DB
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1992; 2(4):453-62. PubMed ID: 1633399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of velocity-encoded MR imaging and fluid dynamic modeling of steady and disturbed flow.
    Sun Y; Hearshen DO; Rankin GW; Haggar AM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1992; 2(4):443-52. PubMed ID: 1633398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Magnetic resonance jet velocity mapping in mitral and aortic valve stenosis.
    Kilner PJ; Manzara CC; Mohiaddin RH; Pennell DJ; Sutton MG; Firmin DN; Underwood SR; Longmore DB
    Circulation; 1993 Apr; 87(4):1239-48. PubMed ID: 8462150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of turbulence on signal intensity in gradient echo images.
    Evans AJ; Blinder RA; Herfkens RJ; Spritzer CE; Kuethe DO; Fram EK; Hedlund LW
    Invest Radiol; 1988 Jul; 23(7):512-8. PubMed ID: 3170139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Experimental studies on magnetic resonance tomographic and magnetic resonance angiographic imaging of poststenotic flow patterns].
    Krug B; Kugel H; Friedmann G; Bunke J; van Dijk P; Schmidt R; Hirche HJ
    Rofo; 1992 May; 156(5):475-81. PubMed ID: 1596553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mitral and aortic valvular flow: quantification with MR phase mapping.
    Søndergaard L; Thomsen C; Ståhlberg F; Gymoese E; Lindvig K; Hildebrandt P; Henriksen O
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1992; 2(3):295-302. PubMed ID: 1627864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Blood flow imaging through detection of temporal variations in magnetization.
    Wolf RL; Richardson DB; LaPlante CC; Huston J; Riederer SJ; Ehman RL
    Radiology; 1992 Nov; 185(2):559-67. PubMed ID: 1410373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Valve and great vessel stenosis: assessment with MR jet velocity mapping.
    Kilner PJ; Firmin DN; Rees RS; Martinez J; Pennell DJ; Mohiaddin RH; Underwood SR; Longmore DB
    Radiology; 1991 Jan; 178(1):229-35. PubMed ID: 1984310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Velocity profiles in stenosed models using magnetic resonance imaging.
    Rittgers SE; Fei DY; Kraft KA; Fatouros PP
    Monogr Atheroscler; 1990; 15():43-53. PubMed ID: 2136929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. High-speed black blood imaging of vessel stenosis in the presence of pulsatile flow.
    Chien D; Goldmann A; Edelman RR
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1992; 2(4):437-41. PubMed ID: 1633397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of acceleration on the accuracy of MR phase velocity measurements.
    Oshinski JN; Ku DN; Bohning DE; Pettigrew RI
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1992; 2(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 1446110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In-plane flow velocity quantification along the phase encoding axis in MRI.
    Duerk JL; Pattany PM
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1988; 6(3):321-33. PubMed ID: 3398740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Velocity profiles in stenosed tube models using magnetic resonance imaging.
    Rittgers SE; Fei DY; Kraft KA; Fatouros PP; Kishore PR
    J Biomech Eng; 1988 Aug; 110(3):180-4. PubMed ID: 3172736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determination of peak velocity in stenotic areas: echocardiography versus k-t SENSE accelerated MR Fourier velocity encoding.
    Baltes C; Hansen MS; Tsao J; Kozerke S; Rezavi R; Pedersen EM; Boesiger P
    Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):249-57. PubMed ID: 17951351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Understanding acceleration-induced displacement artifacts in phase-contrast MR velocity measurements.
    Frayne R; Rutt BK
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 1995; 5(2):207-15. PubMed ID: 7766984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aortic valve pressure gradients in patients with aortic valve stenosis: quantification with velocity-encoded cine MR imaging.
    Eichenberger AC; Jenni R; von Schulthess GK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 May; 160(5):971-7. PubMed ID: 8470612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Turbulent fluctuation velocity: the most significant determinant of signal loss in stenotic vessels.
    Oshinski JN; Ku DN; Pettigrew RI
    Magn Reson Med; 1995 Feb; 33(2):193-9. PubMed ID: 7707909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quantification of turbulence and velocity in stenotic flow using spiral three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI.
    Petersson S; Dyverfeldt P; Sigfridsson A; Lantz J; Carlhäll CJ; Ebbers T
    Magn Reson Med; 2016 Mar; 75(3):1249-55. PubMed ID: 25846511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Appearance of poststenotic jets in MRI: dependence on flow velocity and on imaging parameters.
    Spielmann RP; Schneider O; Thiele F; Heller M; Bücheler E
    Magn Reson Imaging; 1991; 9(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 2056853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.