BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15457381)

  • 1. The AESOP robot system in laparoscopic surgery: increased risk or advantage for surgeon and patient?
    Kraft BM; Jäger C; Kraft K; Leibl BJ; Bittner R
    Surg Endosc; 2004 Aug; 18(8):1216-23. PubMed ID: 15457381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [AESOP 3000--computer-assisted surgery, personal experience].
    Kasalický MA; Sváb J; Fried M; Melechovský D
    Rozhl Chir; 2002 Jul; 81(7):346-9. PubMed ID: 12197168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of surgical performance during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy of two robotic camera holders, EndoAssist and AESOP: a pilot study.
    Wagner AA; Varkarakis IM; Link RE; Sullivan W; Su LM
    Urology; 2006 Jul; 68(1):70-4. PubMed ID: 16844449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) versus classic video-laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized prospective study.
    Aprea G; Coppola Bottazzi E; Guida F; Masone S; Persico G
    J Surg Res; 2011 Apr; 166(2):e109-12. PubMed ID: 21227454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Robotic and telerobotic surgical systems for abdominal surgery].
    Córdova Dupeyrat A; Ballantyne GH
    Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2003; 23(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 12768216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Controlled trial of the introduction of a robotic camera assistant (EndoAssist) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
    Aiono S; Gilbert JM; Soin B; Finlay PA; Gordan A
    Surg Endosc; 2002 Sep; 16(9):1267-70. PubMed ID: 12235507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotics, telesurgery and telementoring--their position in modern urological laparoscopy.
    Rassweiler J; Frede T
    Arch Esp Urol; 2002; 55(6):610-28. PubMed ID: 12224160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Surgeon workload and motion efficiency with robot and human laparoscopic camera control.
    Kondraske GV; Hamilton EC; Scott DJ; Fischer CA; Tesfay ST; Taneja R; Brown RJ; Jones DB
    Surg Endosc; 2002 Nov; 16(11):1523-7. PubMed ID: 12098023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Review of early clinical results.
    Ballantyne GH
    Surg Endosc; 2002 Oct; 16(10):1389-402. PubMed ID: 12140630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laparoscopic telescope with alpha port and aesop to view open surgical procedures.
    Russell KM; Broderick TJ; Demaria EJ; Kothari SN; Merrell RC
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2001 Aug; 11(4):213-8. PubMed ID: 11569510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparison of patients over 70 years old operated for hernia and cholecystolithiasis in the years 1990-1994 and 2001-2002].
    Januszewski J; Markert R
    Pol Merkur Lekarski; 2005 Mar; 18(105):261-4. PubMed ID: 15997627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Image tracking system. A new technique for safe and cost-saving laparoscopic operation].
    Niebuhr H; Born O
    Chirurg; 2000 May; 71(5):580-4. PubMed ID: 10875019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intraoperative and postoperative outcome of robot-assisted and traditional laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication.
    Ceccarelli G; Patriti A; Biancafarina A; Spaziani A; Bartoli A; Bellochi R; Casciola L
    Eur Surg Res; 2009; 43(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 19521090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Combined inguinal hernia repair with prosthetic mesh during transperitoneal robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a 4-year experience.
    Finley DS; Rodriguez E; Ahlering TE
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1296-9; discussion 1299-300. PubMed ID: 17698133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy: initial Mayo Clinic Scottsdale experience.
    Miller DW; Schlinkert RT; Schlinkert DK
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2004 Sep; 79(9):1132-6. PubMed ID: 15357034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Determination of the learning curve of the AESOP robot.
    Jacobs LK; Shayani V; Sackier JM
    Surg Endosc; 1997 Jan; 11(1):54-5. PubMed ID: 8994989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robotic arm enhancement to accommodate improved efficiency and decreased resource utilization in complex minimally invasive surgical procedures.
    Geis WP; Kim HC; Brennan EJ; McAfee PC; Wang Y
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1996; 29():471-81. PubMed ID: 10172847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic pyeloplasty: experience with three robotic platforms.
    Nguan C; Kwan K; Al Omar M; Beasley KA; Luke PP
    Can J Urol; 2007 Jun; 14(3):3571-6. PubMed ID: 17594748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic versus telerobotic laparoscopic cholecystectomy: duration of surgery and outcomes.
    Hourmont K; Chung W; Pereira S; Wasielewski A; Davies R; Ballantyne GH
    Surg Clin North Am; 2003 Dec; 83(6):1445-62. PubMed ID: 14712878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Voice-controlled robotic arm in laparoscopic surgery.
    Bacá I; Schultz C; Grzybowski L; Göetzen V
    Croat Med J; 1999 Sep; 40(3):409-12. PubMed ID: 10411970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.