1946 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15457776)
1. The role of rigid vs. dynamic instrumentation for stabilization of the degenerative lumbosacral spine.
Korovessis P; Papazisis Z; Lambiris E
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 91():457-61. PubMed ID: 15457776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rigid, semirigid versus dynamic instrumentation for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a correlative radiological and clinical analysis of short-term results.
Korovessis P; Papazisis Z; Koureas G; Lambiris E
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Apr; 29(7):735-42. PubMed ID: 15087795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of cage geometry on sagittal alignment in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Gödde S; Fritsch E; Dienst M; Kohn D
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15):1693-9. PubMed ID: 12897494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis].
Zencica P; Chaloupka R; Hladíková J; Krbec M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010 Apr; 77(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 20447355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adjacent segment mobility after rigid and semirigid instrumentation of the lumbar spine.
Cakir B; Carazzo C; Schmidt R; Mattes T; Reichel H; Käfer W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(12):1287-91. PubMed ID: 19455004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Dynamic stabilisation and compression without fusion using Dynesys for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a prospective series of 25 cases].
Ricart O; Serwier JM
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 Nov; 94(7):619-27. PubMed ID: 18984118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reciprocal angulation of vertebral bodies in the sagittal plane in an asymptomatic Greek population.
Korovessis PG; Stamatakis MV; Baikousis AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Mar; 23(6):700-4; discussion 704-5. PubMed ID: 9549792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlative analysis of lateral vertebral radiographic variables and medical outcomes study short-form health survey: a comparative study in asymptomatic volunteers versus patients with low back pain.
Korovessis P; Dimas A; Iliopoulos P; Lambiris E
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2002 Oct; 15(5):384-90. PubMed ID: 12394662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The protective role of dynamic stabilization on the adjacent disc to a rigid instrumented level. An in vitro biomechanical analysis.
Cabello J; Cavanilles-Walker JM; Iborra M; Ubierna MT; Covaro A; Roca J
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2013 Apr; 133(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 23371399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The significance of correlation of radiographic variables and MOS short-form health survey for clinical decision in symptomatic low back pain patients.
Korovessis P; Dimas A; Lambiris E
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 91():325-31. PubMed ID: 15457749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The DIAM spinal stabilisation system to treat degenerative disease of the lumbosacral spine].
Hrabálek L; Machác J; Vaverka M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Oct; 76(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 19912707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Correlation of lumbar disc degeneration and spinal-pelvic sagittal balance].
Liu H; Shrivastava SR; Zheng ZM; Wang JR; Yang H; Li ZM; Wang TP; Wang H; Utsab S
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Apr; 93(15):1123-8. PubMed ID: 23902878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sagittal thoracic decompensation following long adult lumbar spinal instrumentation and fusion to L5 or S1: causes, prevalence, and risk factor analysis.
Kim YJ; Bridwell KH; Lenke LG; Rhim S; Cheh G
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(20):2359-66. PubMed ID: 16985465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Long-term influence of associated arthrodesis on adjacent segments in the treatment of lumbar stenosis: a series of 127 cases with 9-year follow-up].
Guigui P; Wodecki P; Bizot P; Lambert P; Chaumeil G; Deburge A
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):546-57. PubMed ID: 11060428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Usefullness of intrasacral fixation in an extremely unstable lumbosacral spine].
Nishiura T; Nishiguchi M; Kusaka N; Takayama K; Maeda Y; Ogihara K; Nakagawa M
No Shinkei Geka; 2007 Apr; 35(4):377-84. PubMed ID: 17424970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hybrid dynamic stabilization: a biomechanical assessment of adjacent and supraadjacent levels of the lumbar spine.
Mageswaran P; Techy F; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; McLain RF
J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Sep; 17(3):232-42. PubMed ID: 22839756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Is the T9, T11, or L1 the more reliable proximal level after adult lumbar or lumbosacral instrumented fusion to L5 or S1?
Kim YJ; Bridwell KH; Lenke LG; Rhim S; Kim YW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(24):2653-61. PubMed ID: 18007240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does Wallis implant reduce adjacent segment degeneration above lumbosacral instrumented fusion?
Korovessis P; Repantis T; Zacharatos S; Zafiropoulos A
Eur Spine J; 2009 Jun; 18(6):830-40. PubMed ID: 19387697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of operative position and short-segment fusion on maintenance of sagittal alignment of the lumbar spine.
Tribus CB; Belanger TA; Zdeblick TA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Jan; 24(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 9921592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment following long adult lumbar instrumentation and fusion to L5 or S1: can we predict ideal lumbar lordosis?
Kim YJ; Bridwell KH; Lenke LG; Rhim S; Cheh G
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(20):2343-52. PubMed ID: 16985463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
