These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15457801)

  • 1. A simple approach using Bouwer and Rice's method for slug test data analysis.
    Yang SY; Yeh HD
    Ground Water; 2004; 42(5):781-4. PubMed ID: 15457801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of a nonlinear slug test model.
    McElwee CD
    Ground Water; 2001; 39(5):737-44. PubMed ID: 11554252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A modification to the Bouwer and Rice method of slug-test analysis for large-diameter, hand-dug wells.
    Rupp DE; Selker JS; Simůnek J
    Ground Water; 2001; 39(2):308-14. PubMed ID: 11286079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modification of the Bouwer and Rice method to a cutoff wall with a filter cake.
    Nguyen TB; Lee C; Kim S; Choi H
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(6):898-902. PubMed ID: 20533953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SlugIn 1.0: A Free Tool for Automated Slug Test Analysis.
    Martos-Rosillo S; Guardiola-Albert C; Padilla Benítez A; Delgado Pastor J; Azcón González A; Durán Valsero JJ
    Ground Water; 2018 May; 56(3):362-365. PubMed ID: 29579784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. High-resolution slug testing.
    Zemansky GM; McElwee CD
    Ground Water; 2005; 43(2):222-30. PubMed ID: 15819943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Determination of specific yield for the Biscayne Aquifer with a canal-drawdown test.
    Bolster CH; Genereux DP; Saiers JE
    Ground Water; 2001; 39(5):768-77. PubMed ID: 11554256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of slug tests in formations of high hydraulic conductivity.
    Butler JJ; Garnett EJ; Healey JM
    Ground Water; 2003; 41(5):620-30. PubMed ID: 13678116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Numerical modeling of slug tests with MODFLOW using equivalent well blocks.
    Yang L; Wang XS; Jiao JJ
    Ground Water; 2015; 53(1):158-63. PubMed ID: 24635451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Slug tests in wells screened across the water table: some additional considerations.
    Butler JJ
    Ground Water; 2014; 52(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 23582157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of tandem circulation wells to measure hydraulic conductivity without groundwater extraction.
    Goltz MN; Huang J; Close ME; Flintoft MJ; Pang L
    J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Sep; 100(3-4):127-36. PubMed ID: 18674844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Slug test analysis to evaluate permeability of compressible materials.
    Choi H; Nguyen TB; Lee C
    Ground Water; 2008; 46(4):647-52. PubMed ID: 18522655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Low-flow hydraulic conductivity tests at wells that cross the water table.
    Aragon-Jose AT; Robbins GA
    Ground Water; 2011; 49(3):426-31. PubMed ID: 20726899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A closed form slug test theory for high permeability aquifers.
    Ostendorf DW; DeGroot DJ; Dunaj PJ; Jakubowski J
    Ground Water; 2005; 43(1):87-101. PubMed ID: 15726927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A simple correction for slug tests in small-diameter wells.
    Butler JJ
    Ground Water; 2002; 40(3):303-7. PubMed ID: 12019645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Least-Squares Method for the Solution of the Non-smooth Prescribed Jacobian Equation.
    Caboussat A; Glowinski R; Gourzoulidis D
    J Sci Comput; 2022; 93(1):15. PubMed ID: 36035316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three-dimensional flow in the storative semiconfining layers of a leaky aquifer.
    Sepúlveda N
    Ground Water; 2008; 46(1):144-55. PubMed ID: 18181873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hydraulic tests with direct-push equipment.
    Butler JJ; Healey JM; McCall GW; Garnett EJ; Loheide SP
    Ground Water; 2002; 40(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 11798043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Slug tests in the presence of background head trends.
    Ostendorf DW; DeGroot DJ
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(4):609-13. PubMed ID: 20456502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of instream methods for measuring hydraulic conductivity in sandy streambeds.
    Landon MK; Rus DL; Harvey FE
    Ground Water; 2001; 39(6):870-85. PubMed ID: 11708453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.