These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15458181)

  • 41. [Magnetic resonance imaging of cancer of the rectum].
    Guinet C; Buy JN
    Ann Gastroenterol Hepatol (Paris); 1988; 24(4):159-64. PubMed ID: 3048195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Oncology imaging: current status and new approaches.
    Ito H
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2006 Aug; 11(4):256-7. PubMed ID: 16937298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Endorectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan in rectal cancer: a comparative study.
    Balena V; Martino D; Lorusso F; Martino T; Valerio P
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2010 Dec; 82(4):259-61. PubMed ID: 21341576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Imaging-Based Treatment Adaptation in Radiation Oncology.
    Troost EG; Thorwarth D; Oyen WJ
    J Nucl Med; 2015 Dec; 56(12):1922-9. PubMed ID: 26429959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Is magnetic resonance imaging the method of choice in the diagnosis of recurrent rectal carcinoma.
    Krestin GP
    Abdom Imaging; 1997; 22(3):343-5. PubMed ID: 9107665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Oncological radiology.
    Spencer JA
    Clin Radiol; 2001 Jul; 56(7):521-2. PubMed ID: 11446748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Rectal cancer--a combination of MRT and PET allows accurate diagnosis of recurrence].
    Goisser K
    Rofo; 2014 Jan; 186(1):7. PubMed ID: 24511597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. ACRO meeting focuses on successes and challenges for radiation oncologists.
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2006 Apr; 29(2):215-6. PubMed ID: 16601448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer.
    Guinet C; Buy JN; Ghossain MA; Sézeur A; Mallet A; Bigot JM; Vadrot D; Ecoiffier J
    Arch Surg; 1990 Mar; 125(3):385-8. PubMed ID: 2306185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Advances in chemoradiation therapy in rectal cancer: the impact of imaging.
    Tait D
    Br J Radiol; 2005; 78 Spec No 2():S131-7. PubMed ID: 16306636
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Target volume delineation variation in radiotherapy for early stage rectal cancer in the Netherlands.
    Nijkamp J; de Haas-Kock DF; Beukema JC; Neelis KJ; Woutersen D; Ceha H; Rozema T; Slot A; Vos-Westerman H; Intven M; Spruit PH; van der Linden Y; Geijsen D; Verschueren K; van Herk MB; Marijnen CA
    Radiother Oncol; 2012 Jan; 102(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 21903287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Neoadjuvant long-course chemoradiation remains strongly favored over short-course radiotherapy by radiation oncologists in the United States.
    Mowery YM; Salama JK; Zafar SY; Moore HG; Willett CG; Czito BG; Hopkins MB; Palta M
    Cancer; 2017 Apr; 123(8):1434-1441. PubMed ID: 27984651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Radiation oncology: overview and recent advances.
    Dahele M; Senan S
    J R Coll Physicians Edinb; 2010 Jun; 40(2):136-43; quiz 143-4. PubMed ID: 21125059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A Novel Magnetic Resonance Rectography for Rectal Cancer Staging.
    Tang X; Zhang SP; Luo Y; Xia LG; Gong JS
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2018 Oct; 131(20):2506-2507. PubMed ID: 30334541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Pelvic dimensions as a predictor of difficulty in laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.
    Killeen T; Banerjee S; Vijay V; Al-Dabbagh Z; Francis D; Warren S
    Surg Endosc; 2012 Jan; 26(1):277. PubMed ID: 21614664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [The actions of the French Society of Radiation Oncology (SFRO), within the frame of Plan cancer and the recent events of radioprotection].
    Bolla M; Mazeron JJ; Mornex F; Eschwège F
    Cancer Radiother; 2007 Nov; 11(6-7):305-8. PubMed ID: 17884664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [External phased-array MR imaging preoperative assessment of rectal cancer].
    Hoeffel C; Marra MD; Azizi L; Tran Van K; Crema MD; Lewin M; Arrivé L; Tubiana JM
    J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 87(12 Pt 1):1821-30. PubMed ID: 17213766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of endorectal ultrasound versus pelvic magnetic resonance imaging for radiation treatment planning in locally advanced rectal cancer.
    Yu E; DiPetrillo TA; Ramey S; Leonard KL
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2015; 5(5):e451-e455. PubMed ID: 26055613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Application of diffusion weighted imaging in rectal cancer diagnosis.
    Fan XJ; Pan WD; Qin MW
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2012 Oct; 34(5):534-8. PubMed ID: 23134833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. [The future of radiation oncology: technology, ethical considerations and economical aspects].
    Coucke P
    Rev Med Liege; 2010 Apr; 65(4):186-90. PubMed ID: 20499820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.