These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

49 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15459323)

  • 21. Coronary artery calcium scoring using multicardiac computed tomography.
    Horiguchi J; Nakanishi T; Tamura A; Ito K
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2002; 26(6):880-5. PubMed ID: 12488729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of electrocardiogram triggering on reproducibility of coronary artery calcium scoring.
    Mao S; Bakhsheshi H; Lu B; Liu SC; Oudiz RJ; Budoff MJ
    Radiology; 2001 Sep; 220(3):707-11. PubMed ID: 11526270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Coronary artery calcium quantification with retrospectively gated helical CT: protocols and techniques.
    Carr JJ; Danitschek JA; Goff DC; Crouse JR; D'Agostino R; Chen MY; Burke GL
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2001 Jun; 17(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 11587455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reproducibility of coronary calcium quantification in repeat examinations with retrospectively ECG-gated multisection spiral CT.
    Ohnesorge B; Flohr T; Fischbach R; Kopp AF; Knez A; Schröder S; Schöpf UJ; Crispin A; Klotz E; Reiser MF; Becker CR
    Eur Radiol; 2002 Jun; 12(6):1532-40. PubMed ID: 12042964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Coronary calcium scoring: modelling, predicting and correcting for the effect of CT scanner spatial resolution on Agatston and volume scores.
    Kaufman L; Mineyev M; Carlson J; Goldhaber D; Rumberger J
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 May; 48(10):1423-36. PubMed ID: 12812456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Computed tomography: new horizons.
    Budoff MJ
    Tex Heart Inst J; 2006; 33(2):197-200. PubMed ID: 16878625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Risk factors: Long-term low mortality in patients without coronary artery calcium.
    Phillips R
    Nat Rev Cardiol; 2015 Sep; 12(9):501. PubMed ID: 26241885
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. When Nothing Is Really Something: New Evidence of the Importance of Zero Coronary Calcium.
    Greenland P
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Aug; 8(8):910-2. PubMed ID: 26271087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Quantitation of in vitro coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography.
    Mahaisavariya P; Detrano R; Kang X; Garner D; Vo A; Georgiou D; Molloi S; Brundage BH
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1994 Aug; 32(4):387-93. PubMed ID: 7987925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Computed tomography screening for coronary disease.
    Burgess I; Hines B
    Med J Aust; 2000 Jan; 172(1):40-1. PubMed ID: 10682020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Medicine based on scientific evidence versus medicine based on evangelical marketing.
    Detrano R
    Am J Cardiol; 2001 Aug; 88(4):409-10. PubMed ID: 11545764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sixteen-section multi-detector row CT scanners: this changes everything.
    Mezrich R
    Acad Radiol; 2003 Apr; 10(4):351-2. PubMed ID: 12678172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Coronary artery calcium score: a review.
    Arjmand Shabestari A
    Iran Red Crescent Med J; 2013 Dec; 15(12):e16616. PubMed ID: 24693399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT for the detection of inflammation of large arteries: correlation with18F-FDG, calcium burden and risk factors.
    Li X; Samnick S; Lapa C; Israel I; Buck AK; Kreissl MC; Bauer W
    EJNMMI Res; 2012 Sep; 2(1):52. PubMed ID: 23016793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A system for seismocardiography-based identification of quiescent heart phases: implications for cardiac imaging.
    Wick CA; Su JJ; McClellan JH; Brand O; Bhatti PT; Buice AL; Stillman AE; Tang X; Tridandapani S
    IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2012 Sep; 16(5):869-77. PubMed ID: 22581141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Coronary artery calcium scoring and its impact on the clinical practice in the era of multidetector CT.
    Lee J
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Dec; 27 Suppl 1():9-25. PubMed ID: 22012492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Evaluation of the influence of acquisition and reconstruction parameters for 16-row multidetector CT on coronary calcium scoring using a stationary and dynamic cardiac phantom.
    Begemann PG; van Stevendaal U; Koester R; Mahnken AH; Koops A; Adam G; Grass M; Nolte-Ernsting C
    Eur Radiol; 2007 Aug; 17(8):1985-94. PubMed ID: 17268802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Electron beam CT versus 16-slice spiral CT: how accurately can we measure coronary artery calcium volume?
    Horiguchi J; Shen Y; Akiyama Y; Hirai N; Sasaki K; Ishifuro M; Ito K
    Eur Radiol; 2006 Feb; 16(2):374-80. PubMed ID: 16175352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Coronary artery calcium score: influence of reconstruction interval at 16-detector row CT with retrospective electrocardiographic gating.
    Schlosser T; Hunold P; Schmermund A; Kühl H; Waltering KU; Debatin JF; Barkhausen J
    Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):586-9. PubMed ID: 15459323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Quantification of coronary artery calcium with multi-detector row CT: assessing interscan variability with different tube currents pilot study.
    Takahashi N; Bae KT
    Radiology; 2003 Jul; 228(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 12832575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.