These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15459587)

  • 21. Comparison of intracoronary versus intravenous administration of adenosine for measurement of coronary fractional flow reserve.
    Schlundt C; Bietau C; Klinghammer L; Wiedemann R; Rittger H; Ludwig J; Achenbach S
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 May; 8(5):. PubMed ID: 25908694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Postocclusion hyperemia provides a better estimate of coronary reserve than intracoronary adenosine in patients with coronary artery stenosis.
    Nitenberg A; Durand E; Delatour B; Sdiri W; Raha S; Lafont A
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2007 Sep; 19(9):390-4. PubMed ID: 17827509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fractional Flow Reserve in the Transradial Era: Will Hand Vein Adenosine Infusion Suffice?: A Comparative Study of the Extent, Rapidity, and Stability of Hyperemia From Hand and Femoral Venous Routes of Adenosine Administration.
    Scott P; Sirker A; Dworakowski R; Paul G; Candilio L; Jahagirdar N; Melikian N; Byrne J
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Apr; 8(4):527-35. PubMed ID: 25819188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Coronary hyperemic dose responses of intracoronary sodium nitroprusside.
    Parham WA; Bouhasin A; Ciaramita JP; Khoukaz S; Herrmann SC; Kern MJ
    Circulation; 2004 Mar; 109(10):1236-43. PubMed ID: 14993141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of fractional flow reserve measurements using intracoronary adenosine versus intracoronary sodium nitroprusside infusions in moderately stenotic coronary artery lesions.
    Safi M; Namazi MH; Fooladi E; Vakili H; Parsa SA; Khaheshi I; Abbasi MA; Movahed MR
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016; 17(7):441-443. PubMed ID: 27432209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Fractional flow reserve: intracoronary versus intravenous adenosine induced maximal coronary hyperemia.
    Sandhu PS; Kaul U; Gupta RK; Ghose T
    Indian Heart J; 2013; 65(2):147-51. PubMed ID: 23647893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessment of the contractile reserve in patients with intermediate coronary lesions: a strain rate imaging study validated by invasive myocardial fractional flow reserve.
    Weidemann F; Jung P; Hoyer C; Broscheit J; Voelker W; Ertl G; Störk S; Angermann CE; Strotmann JM
    Eur Heart J; 2007 Jun; 28(12):1425-32. PubMed ID: 17504804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Individual Lesion-Level Meta-Analysis Comparing Various Doses of Intracoronary Bolus Injection of Adenosine With Intravenous Administration of Adenosine for Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment.
    Wijntjens GWM; van Uffelen EL; Echavarría-Pinto M; Casadonte L; Stegehuis VE; Murai T; Marques KMJ; Yoon MH; Tahk SJ; Casella G; Leone AM; López Palop R; Schlundt C; Rivero F; Petraco R; Fearon WF; Johnson NP; Jeremias A; Koo BK; Piek JJ; van de Hoef TP
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jan; 13(1):e007893. PubMed ID: 31870178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Resting Pd/Pa and haemodynamic relevance of coronary stenosis as evaluated by fractional flow reserve.
    De Luca G; Verdoia M; Barbieri L; Marino P; Suryapranata H
    Coron Artery Dis; 2018 Mar; 29(2):138-144. PubMed ID: 29028737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of intracoronary versus intravenous adenosine-induced maximal hyperemia for fractional flow reserve measurement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Abo-Aly M; Lolay G; Adams C; Ahmed AE; Abdel-Latif A; Ziada KM
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Nov; 94(5):714-721. PubMed ID: 31074100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The prognostic value of combined intracoronary pressure and blood flow velocity measurements after deferral of percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Meuwissen M; Chamuleau SA; Siebes M; de Winter RJ; Koch KT; Dijksman LM; van den Berg AJ; Tijssen JG; Spaan JA; Piek JJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Feb; 71(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 18288725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The use of the acute Pd/Pa drop after intracoronary nitroglycerin infusion to rule out significant FFR: CANICA (Can intracoronary nitroglycerin predict fractional flow reserve without adenosine?) multicenter study.
    Martin-Reyes R; de la Torre Hernandez JM; Franco-Pelaez J; Lopez-Palop R; Telleria Arrieta M; Amat Santos IJ; Carrillo Saez P; Sanchez-Recalde A; Sanmartin Pena JC; Garcia Camarero T; Brugaletta S; Gimeno de Carlos F; Pinero A; Sorto Sanchez DC; Frutos A; Lasa Larraya G; Navarro F; Farre J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Feb; 87(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 26213338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Intravenous nicorandil versus adenosine for fractional flow reserve measurement: a crossover, randomized study.
    Nishi T; Kitahara H; Fujimoto Y; Nakayama T; Nagashima K; Hanaoka H; Kobayashi Y
    Heart Vessels; 2018 Dec; 33(12):1570-1575. PubMed ID: 29858919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Intracoronary adenosine-induced ventricular arrhythmias during fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement: case series and literature review.
    Patel HR; Shah P; Bajaj S; Virk H; Bikkina M; Shamoon F
    Cardiovasc Interv Ther; 2017 Oct; 32(4):374-380. PubMed ID: 27577946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Intracoronary continuous adenosine infusion.
    Koo BK; Kim CH; Na SH; Youn TJ; Chae IH; Choi DJ; Kim HS; Lee MM; Oh BH; Park YB; Choi YS; Tahk SJ
    Circ J; 2005 Aug; 69(8):908-12. PubMed ID: 16041158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Meta-Analysis of Head-to-Head Comparison of Intracoronary Versus Intravenous Adenosine for the Assessment of Fractional Flow Reserve.
    Rigattieri S; Biondi Zoccai G; Sciahbasi A; Di Russo C; Cera M; Patrizi R; Fedele S; Berni A; Pugliese FR
    Am J Cardiol; 2017 Aug; 120(4):563-568. PubMed ID: 28651849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Long-term prognosis in diabetic patients in whom revascularization is deferred following fractional flow reserve assessment].
    Domínguez-Franco AJ; Jiménez-Navarro MF; Muñoz-García AJ; Alonso-Briales JH; Hernández-García JM; de Teresa Galván E
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 2008 Apr; 61(4):352-9. PubMed ID: 18405515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Efficacy of combined administration of intracoronary papaverine plus intravenous adenosine 5'-triphosphate in assessment of fractional flow reserve.
    Nishi T; Kitahara H; Iwata Y; Fujimoto Y; Nakayama T; Takahara M; Sugimoto K; Kobayashi Y
    J Cardiol; 2016 Dec; 68(6):512-516. PubMed ID: 26811149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Single-wire pressure and flow velocity measurement to quantify coronary stenosis hemodynamics and effects of percutaneous interventions.
    Siebes M; Verhoeff BJ; Meuwissen M; de Winter RJ; Spaan JA; Piek JJ
    Circulation; 2004 Feb; 109(6):756-62. PubMed ID: 14970112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease: a comparison with coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve.
    Rieber J; Huber A; Erhard I; Mueller S; Schweyer M; Koenig A; Schiele TM; Theisen K; Siebert U; Schoenberg SO; Reiser M; Klauss V
    Eur Heart J; 2006 Jun; 27(12):1465-71. PubMed ID: 16720685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.