These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15460377)

  • 1. Characteristics of work groups and their relationship with social and task cohesion in student teams.
    Forrester WR; Tashchian A
    Psychol Rep; 2004 Aug; 95(1):207-14. PubMed ID: 15460377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationships of collective orientation and cohesion to team outcomes.
    Miles JA
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Apr; 86(2):435-44. PubMed ID: 10840892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relation between social cohesion and team performance in soccer teams.
    Tziner A; Nicola N; Rizac A
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Feb; 96(1):145-8. PubMed ID: 12705521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Group cohesion: Relationships with work team culture.
    Sánchez JC; Yurrebaso A
    Psicothema; 2009 Feb; 21(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 19178863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A team fares well with a fair coach: Predictors of social loafing in interactive female sport teams.
    De Backer M; Boen F; De Cuyper B; Høigaard R; Vande Broek G
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2015 Dec; 25(6):897-908. PubMed ID: 25123599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cohesion predicts success in junior ice hockey.
    Salminen S; Luhtanen P
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Oct; 87(2):649-50. PubMed ID: 9842618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The shared leadership process in decision-making teams.
    Bergman JZ; Rentsch JR; Small EE; Davenport SW; Bergman SM
    J Soc Psychol; 2012; 152(1):17-42. PubMed ID: 22308759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When do bad apples not spoil the barrel? Negative relationships in teams, team performance, and buffering mechanisms.
    de Jong JP; Curşeu PL; Leenders RT
    J Appl Psychol; 2014 May; 99(3):514-22. PubMed ID: 24661274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relations of attachment styles and group cohesion in premier league female volleyball players.
    Tiryaki MS; Cepikkurt F
    Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Feb; 104(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 17450966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Team cohesion and team success in sport.
    Carron AV; Bray SR; Eys MA
    J Sports Sci; 2002 Feb; 20(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 11811568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An examination of the relationship between athlete leadership and cohesion using social network analysis.
    Loughead TM; Fransen K; Van Puyenbroeck S; Hoffmann MD; De Cuyper B; Vanbeselaere N; Boen F
    J Sports Sci; 2016 Nov; 34(21):2063-73. PubMed ID: 26902840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An examination of the cohesion-performance relationship in university hockey teams.
    Slater MR; Sewell DF
    J Sports Sci; 1994 Oct; 12(5):423-31. PubMed ID: 7799471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Physio-behavioral coupling in a cooperative team task: contributors and relations.
    Strang AJ; Funke GJ; Russell SM; Dukes AW; Middendorf MS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Feb; 40(1):145-58. PubMed ID: 23750969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Social participation processes, task-oriented participation and learning as antecedents of group cohesion. A longitudinal perspective].
    Picazo Lahiguera C; Zornoza Abad A; Peiró Silla JM
    Psicothema; 2009 May; 21(2):274-9. PubMed ID: 19403082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Team learning and effectiveness in virtual project teams: the role of beliefs about interpersonal context.
    Ortega A; Sánchez-Manzanares M; Gil F; Rico R
    Span J Psychol; 2010 May; 13(1):267-76. PubMed ID: 20480695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Information sharing and team performance: a meta-analysis.
    Mesmer-Magnus JR; Dechurch LA
    J Appl Psychol; 2009 Mar; 94(2):535-46. PubMed ID: 19271807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unlocking the effects of gender faultlines on team creativity: is activation the key?
    Pearsall MJ; Ellis AP; Evans JM
    J Appl Psychol; 2008 Jan; 93(1):225-34. PubMed ID: 18211148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of individual ability, favorable team member scores, and student perception of course importance on student preference of team-based learning and grading methods.
    Su AY
    Adolescence; 2007; 42(168):805-26. PubMed ID: 18229513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Harming high performers: a social comparison perspective on interpersonal harming in work teams.
    Lam CK; Van der Vegt GS; Walter F; Huang X
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 May; 96(3):588-601. PubMed ID: 21171734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interpersonal attraction as a measure of estimation of cohesiveness in elite volleyball teams.
    Bergeles N; Hatziharistos D
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Feb; 96(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 12705514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.