These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15460919)

  • 21. Quality and loudness judgments for music subjected to compression limiting.
    Croghan NB; Arehart KH; Kates JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1177-88. PubMed ID: 22894236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of the temporal weighting of annoyance and loudness.
    Dittrich K; Oberfeld D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3168-78. PubMed ID: 20000930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Tactile enhancement of auditory detection and perceived loudness.
    Gillmeister H; Eimer M
    Brain Res; 2007 Jul; 1160():58-68. PubMed ID: 17573048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Loudness scaling for narrow band noise and speech signal].
    Prosser S; Rosignoli M
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1998 Dec; 18(6):373-8. PubMed ID: 10388150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Annoyance and loudness measurements in auditory fatigue and recovery under different sound exposures].
    Donner R; Doppler U; Haider M; Hloch T; Koller M
    Soz Praventivmed; 1980 Jun; 25(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 7415564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dependence of loudness evaluation by drivers on vehicle styling.
    Yoshida J; Igata T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):3866-73. PubMed ID: 23231117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Temporal weighting of loudness: Comparison between two different psychophysical tasks.
    Ponsot E; Susini P; Oberfeld D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jan; 139(1):406-17. PubMed ID: 26827035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Relation between neural response telemetry thresholds, T- and C-levels, and loudness judgments in 12 adult nucleus 24 cochlear implant recipients.
    Potts LG; Skinner MW; Gotter BD; Strube MJ; Brenner CA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):495-511. PubMed ID: 17609612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The effects of sound level and vibration magnitude on the relative discomfort of noise and vibration.
    Huang Y; Griffin MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jun; 131(6):4558-69. PubMed ID: 22712930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Judgments and measurements of the loudness of tinnitus before and after masking.
    Penner MJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Dec; 31(4):582-7. PubMed ID: 3230887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of Gaussian noise on the threshold, dynamic range, and loudness of analogue cochlear implant stimuli.
    Morse RP; Morse PF; Nunn TB; Archer KA; Boyle P
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Mar; 8(1):42-53. PubMed ID: 17160638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A robust asymmetry in loudness between rising- and falling-intensity tones.
    Ponsot E; Susini P; Meunier S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):907-20. PubMed ID: 25609028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Plasticity and modified loudness following short-term unilateral deprivation: evidence of multiple gain mechanisms within the auditory system.
    Munro KJ; Turtle C; Schaette R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):315-22. PubMed ID: 24437771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Louder sounds can produce less forward masking: effects of component phase in complex tones.
    Gockel H; Moore BC; Patterson RD; Meddis R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Aug; 114(2):978-90. PubMed ID: 12942977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Influence of vehicle color on loudness judgments.
    Menzel D; Fastl H; Graf R; Hellbrück J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 May; 123(5):2477-9. PubMed ID: 18529164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Perception of loudness is influenced by emotion.
    Asutay E; Västfjäll D
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(6):e38660. PubMed ID: 22685594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Detection, loudness, and discrimination of five-component tonal complexes differing in crest factor.
    Preece JP; Wilson RH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jul; 84(1):166-71. PubMed ID: 3411044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of auditory enhancement on the loudness of masker and target components.
    Wang N; Oxenham AJ
    Hear Res; 2016 Mar; 333():150-156. PubMed ID: 26805025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A psychophysical method for assessing visual and acoustic hyperaesthesia in patients with mild head injury.
    Bohnen N; Twijnstra A; Kroeze J; Jolles J
    Br J Psychiatry; 1991 Dec; 159():860-3. PubMed ID: 1790458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Perceived loudness of self-generated sounds is differentially modified by expected sound intensity.
    Reznik D; Henkin Y; Levy O; Mukamel R
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0127651. PubMed ID: 25992603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.