These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 15460919)

  • 61. No evidence for qualitative differences in the processing of short and long temporal intervals.
    Rammsayer T; Ulrich R
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):141-71. PubMed ID: 15907778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Correspondences among pupillary dilation response, subjective salience of sounds, and loudness.
    Liao HI; Kidani S; Yoneya M; Kashino M; Furukawa S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Apr; 23(2):412-25. PubMed ID: 26163191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. On the effect of interaural phase differences on loudness.
    Zwicker E; Henning GB
    Hear Res; 1991 May; 53(1):141-52. PubMed ID: 2066282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Relationships between stimulus intensity and amplitude of visual and auditory event related potentials.
    Kaskey GB; Salzman LF; Klorman R; Pass HL
    Biol Psychol; 1980 Mar; 10(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 7437486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Incorporation of loudness measures in active noise control.
    Sommerfeldt SD; Samuels TO
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Feb; 109(2):591-9. PubMed ID: 11248966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Sensory and cognitive factors in judgments of loudness.
    Marks LE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1979 Aug; 5(3):426-43. PubMed ID: 528950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. An investigation of input level range for the nucleus 24 cochlear implant system: speech perception performance, program preference, and loudness comfort ratings.
    James CJ; Skinner MW; Martin LF; Holden LK; Galvin KL; Holden TA; Whitford L
    Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 12677112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Cross-modal additive conjoint structures and psychophysical scale convergence.
    Ward LM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1990 Jun; 119(2):161-75. PubMed ID: 2141353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Effects of relative and absolute frequency in the spectral weighting of loudness.
    Joshi SN; Wróblewski M; Schmid KK; Jesteadt W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jan; 139(1):373-83. PubMed ID: 26827032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. On the cross-modal perception of intensity.
    Marks LE; Szczesiul R; Ohlott P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1986 Nov; 12(4):517-34. PubMed ID: 2946807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Psychoacoustic correlates of individual noise sensitivity.
    Ellermeier W; Eigenstetter M; Zimmer K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Apr; 109(4):1464-73. PubMed ID: 11325118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Evaluation of loudness-level weightings for assessing the annoyance of environmental noise.
    Schomer PD; Suzuki Y; Saito F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2390-7. PubMed ID: 11757929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Effects of forward masking on intensity discrimination, frequency discrimination, and the detection of tones in noise.
    Carlyon RP; Beveridge HA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 May; 93(5):2886-95. PubMed ID: 8315152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Pure-Tone-Spondee Threshold Relationships in Functional Hearing Loss: A Test of Loudness Contribution.
    Schlauch RS; Han HJ; Yu TJ; Carney E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Jan; 60(1):136-143. PubMed ID: 27973669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Effect of noise on the contrast detection threshold in visual perception.
    Sasaki H; Todorokihara M; Ishida T; Miyachi J; Kitamura T; Aoki R
    Neurosci Lett; 2006 Nov; 408(2):94-7. PubMed ID: 16996210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Influence of impression of vehicle styling on loudness of acceleration sounds in cabin.
    Yoshida J; Igata T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jul; 130(1):EL19-24. PubMed ID: 21786863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Loudness perception with pulsatile electrical stimulation: the effect of interpulse intervals.
    McKay CM; McDermott HJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Aug; 104(2 Pt 1):1061-74. PubMed ID: 9714925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. A proposal for the measurement of the level of fluctuating background noise used in audiology.
    Tschopp K; Beckenbauer T; Harris F
    Scand Audiol; 1991; 20(3):197-202. PubMed ID: 1842289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Auditory continuity and loudness computation.
    McAdams S; Botte MC; Drake C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Mar; 103(3):1580-91. PubMed ID: 9514022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. The effect of loudness on the reverberance of music: reverberance prediction using loudness models.
    Lee D; Cabrera D; Martens WL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1194-205. PubMed ID: 22352494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.